Gasoyan Hamlet, Ibrahim Jennifer K, Aaronson William E, Sarwer David B
Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 May;17(5):860-868. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
Bariatric surgery is underutilized in the United States.
To examine temporal changes in patient characteristics and insurer type mix among adult bariatric surgery patients in southeastern Pennsylvania and to investigate the associations between payor type, insurance plan type, cost-sharing arrangements (among traditional Medicare beneficiaries), and bariatric surgery utilization.
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council's databases in southeastern Pennsylvania during 2014-2018.
All adult patients who underwent the most common types of bariatric surgery and a 1:1 matched sample of surgery patients and those who were eligible for surgery but did not undergo surgery were identified. Contingency tables, Pearson χ tests, and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.
Over the 5 years, there was an increase in the proportion of Black individuals (37.1% in 2014 versus 43.0% in 2018), Hispanics (5.4% versus 8.0%), and Medicaid beneficiaries (19.2% in 2014 versus 28.5% in 2018) who underwent surgery. The odds of undergoing bariatric surgery based on payor type only between Medicare beneficiaries were statistically different (22% smaller odds) compared with privately insured individuals. There were significantly different odds of undergoing surgery based on insurance plan type within Medicare and private insurance payor categories. Individuals with traditional Medicare plans with no supplementary insurance and those with dual eligibility had smaller odds of undergoing surgery (42% and 32%, respectively) compared with those with private secondary insurance.
Insurance plan design may be as important in determining the utilization of bariatric surgery as the general payor type after controlling for confounding socio-demographic factors.
减肥手术在美国的利用率较低。
研究宾夕法尼亚州东南部成年减肥手术患者的特征及保险类型组合随时间的变化,并调查付款人类型、保险计划类型、费用分摊安排(在传统医疗保险受益人中)与减肥手术利用率之间的关联。
2014年至2018年期间宾夕法尼亚州医疗保健成本控制委员会在宾夕法尼亚州东南部的数据库。
识别所有接受最常见类型减肥手术的成年患者以及手术患者与符合手术条件但未接受手术者的1:1匹配样本。使用列联表、Pearson χ检验和逻辑回归进行统计分析。
在这5年中,接受手术的黑人个体比例有所增加(2014年为37.1%,2018年为43.0%),西班牙裔个体比例(5.4%对8.0%)以及医疗补助受益人比例(2014年为19.2%,2018年为28.5%)也有所增加。仅基于付款人类型,医疗保险受益人与私人保险个体相比,接受减肥手术的几率在统计学上存在差异(低22%)。在医疗保险和私人保险付款人类别中,基于保险计划类型接受手术的几率存在显著差异。与拥有私人补充保险的个体相比,没有补充保险的传统医疗保险计划个体和具有双重资格的个体接受手术的几率较小(分别为42%和32%)。
在控制混杂的社会人口因素后,保险计划设计在决定减肥手术利用率方面可能与一般付款人类型同样重要。