• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一家三级胃肠肿瘤中心重组多学科团队会议为内部和区域护理路径增添价值。一项混合方法评估。

Reorganizing the Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in a Tertiary Centre for Gastro-Intestinal Oncology Adds Value to the Internal and Regional Care Pathways. A Mixed Method Evaluation.

作者信息

van Huizen Lidia S, Dijkstra Pieter U, Hemmer Patrick H J, van Etten Boudewijn, Buis Carlijn I, Olsder Linde, van Vilsteren Frederike G I, Ahaus Kees C T B, Roodenburg Jan L N

机构信息

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5526.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.5526
PMID:33664641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908930/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The reorganisation of the structure of a Gastro-Intestinal Oncology Multidisciplinary Team Meeting (GIO-MDTM) in a tertiary centre with three care pathways is evaluated on added value.

METHODS

In a mixed method investigation, process indicators such as throughput times were analysed and stakeholders were interviewed regarding benefits and drawbacks of the reorganisation and current MDTM functioning.

RESULTS

For the hepatobiliary care pathway, the time to treatment plan increased, but the time to start treatment reduced significantly. The percentage of patients treated within the Dutch standard of 63 days increased for the three care pathways. From the interviews, three themes emerged: added value of MDTMs, focus on planning integrated care and awareness of possible improvements.

DISCUSSION

The importance of evaluating interventions in oncology care pathways is shown, including detecting unexpected drawbacks. The evaluation provides insight into complex dynamics of the care pathways and contributes with recommendations on functioning of an MDTM.

CONCLUSIONS

Throughput times are only partly determined by oncology care pathway management, but have influence on the functioning of MDTMs. Process indicator information can help to reflect on integration of care in the region, resulting in an increase of patients treated within the Dutch standard.

摘要

引言

在一个拥有三条护理路径的三级中心,对胃肠肿瘤多学科团队会议(GIO-MDTM)的结构重组进行了附加值评估。

方法

在一项混合方法调查中,分析了诸如周转时间等过程指标,并就重组的利弊以及当前MDTM的运作情况对利益相关者进行了访谈。

结果

对于肝胆护理路径,治疗计划制定时间增加,但开始治疗的时间显著减少。三条护理路径中在荷兰63天标准内接受治疗的患者百分比均有所增加。从访谈中出现了三个主题:MDTM的附加值、对综合护理规划的关注以及对可能改进的认识。

讨论

显示了评估肿瘤护理路径干预措施的重要性,包括发现意外的缺点。该评估深入了解了护理路径的复杂动态,并为MDTM的运作提供了建议。

结论

周转时间仅部分由肿瘤护理路径管理决定,但对MDTM的运作有影响。过程指标信息有助于反思该地区护理的整合情况,从而使在荷兰标准内接受治疗的患者数量增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff2/7908930/47bedfeeb759/ijic-21-1-5526-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff2/7908930/39cc5baf1c71/ijic-21-1-5526-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff2/7908930/5a469b7eccf2/ijic-21-1-5526-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff2/7908930/47bedfeeb759/ijic-21-1-5526-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff2/7908930/39cc5baf1c71/ijic-21-1-5526-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff2/7908930/5a469b7eccf2/ijic-21-1-5526-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff2/7908930/47bedfeeb759/ijic-21-1-5526-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
Reorganizing the Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in a Tertiary Centre for Gastro-Intestinal Oncology Adds Value to the Internal and Regional Care Pathways. A Mixed Method Evaluation.在一家三级胃肠肿瘤中心重组多学科团队会议为内部和区域护理路径增添价值。一项混合方法评估。
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5526.
2
Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review.影响肿瘤多学科团队会议质量和功能的因素:系统评价的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08112-0.
3
What is the added value of specialist radiology review of multidisciplinary team meeting cases in a tertiary care center?多学科团队会议病例中专科放射学审查的附加值是什么?
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6460-6465. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10680-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Preparing tomorrow's medical specialists for participating in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: perceived barriers, facilitators and training needs.为参与肿瘤多学科团队会议做好明天的医学专家的准备:感知到的障碍、促进因素和培训需求。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03570-w.
5
Input of Psychosocial Information During Multidisciplinary Team Meetings at Medical Oncology Departments: Protocol for an Observational Study.肿瘤内科多学科团队会议期间社会心理信息的输入:一项观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 26;7(2):e64. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9239.
6
Pros and cons of streamlining and use of computerised clinical decision support systems to future-proof oncological multidisciplinary team meetings.简化流程及使用计算机化临床决策支持系统对肿瘤多学科团队会议未来发展的利弊
Front Oncol. 2023 May 18;13:1178165. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178165. eCollection 2023.
7
The proliferation of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): how can radiology departments continue to support them all?多学科团队会议(MDTMs)的激增:放射科部门如何继续支持所有这些会议?
Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3679-84. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3760-x. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
Facilitators and barriers to conducting an efficient, competent and high-quality oncological multidisciplinary team meeting.提高肿瘤多学科团队会议效率、能力和质量的促进因素与阻碍因素。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002130.
9
How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium.癌症护理中的多学科团队会议有多学科性?比利时弗拉芒地区肿瘤科室的一项观察性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 21;12:159-167. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S196660. eCollection 2019.
10
A national audit of radiology practice in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings.一项针对癌症多学科团队会议中放射学实践的全国性审计。
Clin Radiol. 2020 Aug;75(8):640.e17-640.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.03.031. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning from Adaptations to the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Teleconsultation Supported Cancer Care Pathways at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Northern Italy.从对新冠疫情的适应中学习:远程会诊如何支持意大利北部一家综合癌症中心的癌症护理路径
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;15(9):2486. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092486.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of oncological care pathways in primary and secondary care on patient, professional and health systems outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.初级和二级保健中的肿瘤护理路径对患者、专业人员和卫生系统结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 25;9(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01498-0.
2
Effects of implementing a care pathway for colorectal cancer surgery in ten European hospitals: an international multicenter pre-post-test study.实施结直肠癌手术护理路径在十家欧洲医院的效果:一项国际多中心前后测试研究。
Updates Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00706-9. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
3
Does multidisciplinary videoconferencing between a head-and-neck cancer centre and its partner hospital add value to their patient care and decision-making? A mixed-method evaluation.
头颈癌中心与其合作医院之间的多学科视频会议是否能为患者护理和决策增添价值?一项混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;9(11):e028609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028609.
4
Implementing standardized cancer patient pathways (CPPs) - a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of health care professionals.实施标准化癌症患者路径(CPPs)-一项探索医疗保健专业人员观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4413-6.
5
Strengthening Patient-Centered Care in the VHA: A Relational Model of Change.加强退伍军人健康管理局以患者为中心的护理:一种变革的关系模型
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):7-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04996-7.
6
How to incorporate geriatric assessment in clinical decision-making for older patients with cancer. An implementation study.如何将老年综合评估纳入老年癌症患者的临床决策。一项实施研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Nov;10(6):951-959. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
7
Implementation and first results of a mandatory, nationwide audit on liver surgery.一项强制性的、全国性的肝脏手术审计的实施和初步结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Oct;21(10):1400-1410. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
8
Quality insurance in head and neck cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A watchful eye on real-life experience.头颈部癌症多学科团队会议中的质量保障:关注真实经验。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Apr;91:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
9
Multidisciplinary first-day consultation accelerates diagnostic procedures and throughput times of patients in a head-and-neck cancer care pathway, a mixed method study.一项混合方法研究表明,多学科首日会诊可加快头颈癌护理路径中患者的诊断程序和周转时间。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3637-1.
10
Evaluating the Current Status of Rectal Cancer Care in the US: Where We Stand at the Start of the Commission on Cancer's National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.评估美国直肠癌治疗现状:美国癌症委员会直肠癌全国认证计划启动之初的现状。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 May;226(5):881-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.057. Epub 2018 Mar 23.