• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为参与肿瘤多学科团队会议做好明天的医学专家的准备:感知到的障碍、促进因素和培训需求。

Preparing tomorrow's medical specialists for participating in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: perceived barriers, facilitators and training needs.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, huispost 415, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Goldebaldkwartier 419, Utrecht, DT, 3511, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03570-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03570-w
PMID:35761247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9238222/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment plan for patients with cancer is discussed in multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs). Effective meetings require all participants to have collaboration and communication competences. Participating residents (defined as qualified doctors in training to become a specialist) are expected to develop these competences by observing their supervisors. However, the current generation of medical specialists is not trained to work in multidisciplinary teams; currently, training mainly focuses on medical competences. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators among residents with respect to learning how to participate competently in MDTMs, and to identify additional training needs regarding their future role in MDTMs, as perceived by residents and specialists.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Dutch residents and medical specialists participating in oncological MDTMs. Purposive sampling was used to maximise variation in participants' demographic and professional characteristics (e.g. sex, specialty, training duration, type and location of affiliated hospital). Interview data were systematically analysed according to the principles of thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen residents and 16 specialists were interviewed. Three themes emerged: 1) awareness of the educational function of MDTMs among specialists and residents; 2) characteristics of MDTMs (e.g. time constraints, MDTM regulations) and 3) team dynamics and behaviour. Learning to participate in MDTMs is facilitated by: specialists and residents acknowledging the educational function of MDTMs beyond their medical content, and supervisors fulfilling their teaching role and setting conditions that enable residents to take a participative role (e.g. being well prepared, sitting in the inner circle, having assigned responsibilities). Barriers to residents' MDTM participation were insufficient guidance by their supervisors, time constraints, regulations hindering their active participation, a hierarchical structure of relations, unfamiliarity with the team and personal characteristics of residents (e.g. lack of confidence and shyness). Interviewees indicated a need for additional training (e.g. simulations) for residents, especially to enhance behavioural and communication skills.

CONCLUSION

Current practice with regard to preparing residents for their future role in MDTMs is hampered by a variety of factors. Most importantly, more awareness of the educational purposes of MDTMs among both residents and medical specialists would allow residents to participate in and learn from oncological MDTMs. Future studies should focus on collaboration competences.

摘要

简介

癌症患者的最佳治疗方案在多学科团队会议(MDTMs)中进行讨论。有效的会议需要所有参与者都具备协作和沟通能力。参会的住院医师(定义为正在接受培训以成为专家的合格医生)应通过观察他们的上级医生来发展这些能力。然而,当前一代的医学专家并未接受过团队合作方面的培训;目前,培训主要侧重于医学能力。本研究旨在确定住院医师在学习如何胜任地参与 MDTMs 方面的障碍和促进因素,并确定他们对未来在 MDTMs 中角色的额外培训需求,这是由住院医师和专家感知到的。

方法

对参与肿瘤 MDTM 的荷兰住院医师和医学专家进行了半结构化访谈。采用目的性抽样方法,使参与者在人口统计学和专业特征(如性别、专业、培训时长、附属医院类型和地点)方面的差异最大化。根据主题内容分析的原则,对访谈数据进行系统分析。

结果

共访谈了 19 名住院医师和 16 名专家。出现了 3 个主题:1)专家和住院医师对 MDTMs 的教育功能的认识;2)MDTM 的特点(如时间限制、MDTM 规定);3)团队动态和行为。以下因素有助于学习参与 MDTMs:专家和住院医师除了 MDTM 的医学内容外,还承认其教育功能,上级医生履行其教学角色并为住院医师提供条件,使他们能够发挥参与作用(如做好充分准备、坐在内圈、承担指定的责任)。住院医师参与 MDTM 的障碍包括上级医生指导不足、时间限制、妨碍其积极参与的规定、等级制度的关系结构、对团队的不熟悉以及住院医师的个人特点(如缺乏信心和害羞)。受访者表示住院医师需要额外的培训(如模拟),特别是为了增强行为和沟通技巧。

结论

目前,为住院医师准备未来在 MDTMs 中的角色的做法受到各种因素的阻碍。最重要的是,住院医师和医学专家都需要提高对 MDTMs 教育目的的认识,使住院医师能够参与并从肿瘤 MDTMs 中学习。未来的研究应侧重于协作能力。

相似文献

1
Preparing tomorrow's medical specialists for participating in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: perceived barriers, facilitators and training needs.为参与肿瘤多学科团队会议做好明天的医学专家的准备:感知到的障碍、促进因素和培训需求。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03570-w.
2
Facilitators and barriers to conducting an efficient, competent and high-quality oncological multidisciplinary team meeting.提高肿瘤多学科团队会议效率、能力和质量的促进因素与阻碍因素。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002130.
3
Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review.影响肿瘤多学科团队会议质量和功能的因素:系统评价的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08112-0.
4
Pros and cons of streamlining and use of computerised clinical decision support systems to future-proof oncological multidisciplinary team meetings.简化流程及使用计算机化临床决策支持系统对肿瘤多学科团队会议未来发展的利弊
Front Oncol. 2023 May 18;13:1178165. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178165. eCollection 2023.
5
Input of Psychosocial Information During Multidisciplinary Team Meetings at Medical Oncology Departments: Protocol for an Observational Study.肿瘤内科多学科团队会议期间社会心理信息的输入:一项观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 26;7(2):e64. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9239.
6
Team functioning across different tumour types: Insights from a Swiss cancer center using qualitative and quantitative methods.跨不同肿瘤类型的团队功能:瑞士癌症中心使用定性和定量方法的见解。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Aug;5(8):e1541. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1541. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
7
Exploring non-physician care professionals' roles in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study.探索非医师医疗专业人员在癌症多学科团队会议中的角色:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0263611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263611. eCollection 2022.
8
What is the added value of specialist radiology review of multidisciplinary team meeting cases in a tertiary care center?多学科团队会议病例中专科放射学审查的附加值是什么?
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6460-6465. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10680-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
9
The proliferation of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): how can radiology departments continue to support them all?多学科团队会议(MDTMs)的激增:放射科部门如何继续支持所有这些会议?
Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3679-84. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3760-x. Epub 2015 May 1.
10
How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium.癌症护理中的多学科团队会议有多学科性?比利时弗拉芒地区肿瘤科室的一项观察性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 21;12:159-167. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S196660. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Health and Health-Related Domains on Professionals' Perceptions of Care Complexity, Their Preferences for Integrated Care Planning and Interprofessional Collaboration.健康及与健康相关领域对专业人员对护理复杂性的认知、其对综合护理规划和跨专业协作的偏好的影响。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Jul 9;25(3):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8997. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Multidisciplinary Oncology Education Among Postgraduate Trainees: Systematic Review.研究生培训中的多学科肿瘤学教育:系统评价
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 May 26;11:e63655. doi: 10.2196/63655.
3
The impact of a communal multidisciplinary tumour board on medical education.社区多学科肿瘤委员会对医学教育的影响。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Oct 11;18:1788. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1788. eCollection 2024.
4
Significance of Multidisciplinary Teams for Patients with Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Diseases: An Observational Retrospective Study in a General Hospital in China.多学科团队对口腔颌面外科疾病患者的意义:中国一家综合医院的观察性回顾性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Dec 30;17:6187-6198. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S504720. eCollection 2024.
5
The Quality of Family Medicine Team Conferences Through the Lens of a Director: An Autoethnography.从主任视角看家庭医学团队会议的质量:一项自我民族志研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 9;16(7):e64173. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64173. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Multidisciplinary team meetings in Hematology: a national mixed-methods study.血液学多学科团队会议:一项全国性混合方法研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11431-y.
7
Impact of COVID-19 on cancer care pathways in a comprehensive cancer center in northern Italy.COVID-19 对意大利北部综合癌症中心癌症治疗路径的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;11:1187912. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1187912. eCollection 2023.
8
Pros and cons of streamlining and use of computerised clinical decision support systems to future-proof oncological multidisciplinary team meetings.简化流程及使用计算机化临床决策支持系统对肿瘤多学科团队会议未来发展的利弊
Front Oncol. 2023 May 18;13:1178165. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178165. eCollection 2023.
9
Learning from Adaptations to the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Teleconsultation Supported Cancer Care Pathways at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Northern Italy.从对新冠疫情的适应中学习:远程会诊如何支持意大利北部一家综合癌症中心的癌症护理路径
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;15(9):2486. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092486.

本文引用的文献

1
The cancer multidisciplinary team meeting: in need of change? History, challenges and future perspectives.癌症多学科团队会议:是否需要变革?历史、挑战与未来展望。
BJU Int. 2021 Sep;128(3):271-279. doi: 10.1111/bju.15495. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
Development of a Clinical Teaching Unit in Internal Medicine to Promote Interprofessional and Multidisciplinary Learning: A Practical Intervention.建立内科临床教学单元以促进跨专业和多学科学习:一项实践干预措施。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):78-88. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1792309. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
3
Use of the theoretical domains framework and behaviour change wheel to develop a novel intervention to improve the quality of multidisciplinary cancer conference decision-making.运用理论领域框架和行为改变轮盘,开发一种新的干预措施,以提高多学科癌症会议决策的质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 24;20(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05255-w.
4
Streamlining cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: challenges and solutions.优化癌症多学科团队会议:挑战与解决方案
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020 Mar 2;81(3):1-6. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2020.0024. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
The impact of Clinical Nurse Specialists on the decision making process in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study.临床护理专家对癌症多学科团队会议决策过程的影响:一项定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Dec;43:101674. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101674. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
6
Instruments measuring interprofessional collaboration in healthcare - a scoping review.测量医疗保健领域中多专业协作的工具——范围综述。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):147-161. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1637336. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
7
Qualitative Research Methods in Medical Education.医学教育中的定性研究方法。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jul;131(1):14-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002728.
8
The clinical learning environment.临床学习环境。
Med Teach. 2019 Apr;41(4):366-372. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1566601. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
9
Interprofessional communication in the emergency department: residents' perceptions and implications for medical education.急诊科的跨专业沟通:住院医师的认知及其对医学教育的启示
Int J Med Educ. 2018 Oct 25;9:262-270. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5bb5.c111.
10
Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.医疗保健中的团队合作:实现更安全、高质量护理的关键发现。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):433-450. doi: 10.1037/amp0000298.