Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉旁路移植术后阿司匹林单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的比较。

Comparison of Aspirin Monotherapy versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;148:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.026. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Abstract

Aspirin remains the gold standard antiplatelet regimen following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), however, there is growing support for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). This study compares outcomes of aspirin monotherapy versus DAPT following CABG. This was a propensity-matched retrospective study from a large, multi-hospital healthcare system. It included patients who received either aspirin monotherapy or DAPT following isolated CABG between 2011 and 2018. Patients prescribed aspirin monotherapy were started on 81 mg aspirin daily, and patients on DAPT were prescribed 81 mg aspirin daily and 75 mg clopidogrel daily. Patients received alternative drug dosing or antiplatelet agents other than clopidogrel only if this was prescribed for another diagnosis or they had a preexisting contraindication. Primary outcomes included overall survival and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare survival and cumulative incidence curves and Gray's test were used to compare MACCE. A total of 3,562 propensity-matched patients were included, 1,242 (34.9%) receiving aspirin monotherapy and 2,320 (65.1%) receiving DAPT. Groups were well-matched with respect to age, baseline comorbidity, indication for CABG, and completeness of revascularization. Median follow-up was 4.90 years (IQR 3.30 to 6.90 years). DAPT was associated with higher rate of postoperative transfusion (30.7% vs 25.4%, p = 0.001). Overall survival was comparable between groups (1-year aspirin 95.9% versus DAPT 97.2% and 5-years aspirin 86.3% versus DAPT 87.8%; log-rank p = 0.194). Rates of MACCE were also similar (1-year aspirin 9.4% versus DAPT 8.7% and 5-years aspirin 26.7% versus DAPT 24.7%; p = 0.798). In this propensity-matched analysis, DAPT did not confer any advantage in terms of improved survival or freedom from MACCE compared to aspirin monotherapy following isolated CABG, and was associated with a higher postoperative transfusion rate.

摘要

阿司匹林仍然是冠状动脉旁路移植术后(CABG)的金标准抗血小板治疗方案,然而,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)越来越受到支持。本研究比较了 CABG 后阿司匹林单药治疗与 DAPT 的结果。这是一项来自大型多医院医疗保健系统的倾向匹配回顾性研究。它纳入了 2011 年至 2018 年间接受单纯 CABG 后接受阿司匹林单药或 DAPT 治疗的患者。接受阿司匹林单药治疗的患者每天服用 81mg 阿司匹林,接受 DAPT 治疗的患者每天服用 81mg 阿司匹林和 75mg 氯吡格雷。如果患者因其他诊断而需要调整药物剂量或使用除氯吡格雷以外的抗血小板药物,或存在已知的用药禁忌,则给予替代药物或抗血小板药物。主要结局包括总生存和主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCE),定义为死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和再次血运重建的复合事件。Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验用于比较生存和累积发生率曲线,Gray 检验用于比较 MACCE。共纳入 3562 例倾向匹配的患者,其中 1242 例(34.9%)接受阿司匹林单药治疗,2320 例(65.1%)接受 DAPT 治疗。两组在年龄、基线合并症、CABG 适应证和血运重建的完整性方面具有可比性。中位随访时间为 4.90 年(IQR 3.30 至 6.90 年)。DAPT 术后输血率较高(30.7%比 25.4%,p=0.001)。两组总生存无差异(1 年阿司匹林组 95.9%比 DAPT 组 97.2%,5 年阿司匹林组 86.3%比 DAPT 组 87.8%;对数秩检验 p=0.194)。MACCE 发生率也相似(1 年阿司匹林组 9.4%比 DAPT 组 8.7%,5 年阿司匹林组 26.7%比 DAPT 组 24.7%;p=0.798)。在这项倾向匹配分析中,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,DAPT 并不能改善孤立性 CABG 后的生存或免于 MACCE,并且与较高的术后输血率相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验