School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Nutrients. 2021 Feb 13;13(2):612. doi: 10.3390/nu13020612.
An increasing number of dietary interventions for cancer survivors have been based on the behaviour change theory framework. The purpose of this study is to review the use and implementation of behaviour change theories in dietary interventions for people after cancer and assess their effects on the reported outcomes.
The search strategy from a Cochrane review on dietary interventions for cancer survivors was expanded to incorporate an additional criterion on the use of behaviour change theory and updated to September 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) testing a dietary intervention compared to the control were included. Standard Cochrane methodological procedures were used.
Nineteen RCTs, with 6261 participants (age range 44.6 to 73.1 years), were included in the review. The Social Cognitive Theory was the most frequently used theory (15 studies, 79%). Studies included between 4 to 17 behaviour change techniques. Due to limited information on the mediators of intervention and large heterogeneity between studies, no meta-analyses was conducted to assess which theoretical components of the interventions are effective.
Whilst researchers have incorporated behaviour change theories into dietary interventions for cancer survivors, due to inconsistencies in design, evaluation and reporting, the effect of theories on survivors' outcomes remains unclear.
越来越多针对癌症幸存者的饮食干预措施都是基于行为改变理论框架。本研究旨在综述癌症幸存者饮食干预中行为改变理论的使用和实施情况,并评估其对报告结果的影响。
对一项关于癌症幸存者饮食干预的 Cochrane 综述的检索策略进行了扩展,纳入了行为改变理论使用的额外标准,并更新至 2020 年 9 月。纳入比较饮食干预与对照组的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用标准的 Cochrane 方法学程序。
共纳入 19 项 RCT,涉及 6261 名参与者(年龄范围 44.6 至 73.1 岁)。最常使用的理论是社会认知理论(15 项研究,79%)。研究中包含 4 至 17 种行为改变技术。由于干预措施中介的信息有限且研究间存在很大的异质性,因此没有进行荟萃分析来评估干预措施的哪些理论组成部分是有效的。
尽管研究人员已将行为改变理论纳入癌症幸存者的饮食干预措施中,但由于设计、评估和报告的不一致性,理论对幸存者结局的影响仍不清楚。