Suppr超能文献

自然探险旅游游客的感觉寻求和担忧的调节作用。

The Moderating Roles of Sensation Seeking and Worry among Nature-Based Adventure Tourists.

机构信息

Tourism Industry Data Analytics Lab (TIDAL), Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.

Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2021. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042021.

Abstract

The adventure tourism subsector continues to be popular today. Both industry and academia define adventure tourism's scope from either the physical (e.g., outdoor activity and physical activity) or psychological aspects (e.g., thrill seeking and challenges). Recent studies have pointed out that adventure tourism can be interpreted differently across cultures and markets. Still, risk has always been universally accepted as an essential characteristic of adventure tourism. Thus, most empirical research has studied the role of risk as one of the motivations. However, attempts to investigate related elements that are either a response to or a coping mechanism for the presence of risk are scarce. This present study adopted one of the most prominent frameworks in explaining behavioral intentions, the theory of planned behavior, and included involvement and knowledge variables to extend it. Furthermore, the sensation-seeking and worry constructs were tested for their moderating impact on intentions to participate in adventure tours. The results of structural equation modeling and multigroup invariance tests revealed that subjective norms were not a significant predictor of intentions, while both sensation seeking and worry significantly moderated the relationships between the study variables.

摘要

探险旅游分部门如今依然大受欢迎。无论是业界还是学术界,都从身体活动(例如户外活动和体力活动)或心理方面(例如寻求刺激和挑战)来定义探险旅游的范围。最近的研究指出,探险旅游在不同文化和市场可能有不同的解读。不过,风险一直被普遍视为探险旅游的一个基本特征。因此,大多数实证研究都将风险作为动机之一进行研究。然而,对于风险存在的应对机制或风险的相关因素的研究却很少。本研究采用了最著名的行为意图解释框架之一——计划行为理论,并纳入了参与度和知识变量对其进行扩展。此外,本研究还测试了寻求刺激和担忧这两个构念对参与探险旅游的意图的调节作用。结构方程模型和多群组不变性测试的结果表明,主观规范不是意图的显著预测因素,而寻求刺激和担忧都显著调节了研究变量之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e8/7922662/0d8255ce7a49/ijerph-18-02021-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验