Heilbrunn Department of Population & Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2022 Jan-Feb;137(1):168-178. doi: 10.1177/0033354921999162. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
Public health education must respond to 21st-century public health challenges in an ever-evolving landscape. We describe implementation and educational outcomes of the Columbia University Master of Public Health (MPH) Core (hereinafter, Core) curriculum since its inception.
This retrospective evaluation combined 6 years (2013-2018) of student survey data collected from students (N = 1902) on the structure and delivery of the Core curriculum to quantify implementation, student experience, and learning outcomes, both during study (Core Evaluation Survey [CES]) and after graduation (Graduate Exit Survey [GES]). We used χ tests and analysis of variance to compare outcomes across years, and we used McNemar tests to compare differences in outcomes from the same students at different time points.
Of 1902 respondents to the CES, 1795 (94.4%) completed the Core curriculum. During the study period, 81.7% of students were able to integrate concepts across Core curriculum modules with ease; postgraduation, a similar proportion of respondents were able to apply Core curriculum content to departmental and certificate coursework and applied field experiences. On-time graduation rates were high (range, 85%-93%).
The high percentage of students who reported their ability to integrate concepts and who completed the Core during the study period likely reflected changes to teaching team structures, training, attention to inclusion and equity, and collaboration to implement active learning strategies. The Core curriculum meets its intended goals by providing critical learning abilities to support ongoing interdisciplinary work.
公共卫生教育必须应对 21 世纪公共卫生挑战,适应不断变化的环境。我们描述了自成立以来哥伦比亚大学公共卫生硕士(MPH)核心课程(以下简称核心课程)的实施和教育成果。
这项回顾性评估结合了 6 年来(2013-2018 年)从学生(共 1902 人)收集的关于核心课程结构和交付的学生调查数据,以量化实施、学生体验和学习成果,包括学习期间(核心评估调查[CES])和毕业后(研究生出口调查[GES])。我们使用 χ2 检验和方差分析比较各年的结果,并使用 McNemar 检验比较同一学生在不同时间点的结果差异。
在接受 CES 调查的 1902 名受访者中,有 1795 名(94.4%)完成了核心课程。在学习期间,81.7%的学生能够轻松地将核心课程模块中的概念整合在一起;毕业后,同样比例的受访者能够将核心课程内容应用于部门和证书课程以及应用实地经验。按时毕业率很高(范围为 85%-93%)。
报告能够整合概念并在学习期间完成核心课程的学生比例很高,这可能反映了教学团队结构、培训、对包容和平等的关注、以及实施主动学习策略的合作的变化。核心课程通过提供关键学习能力来支持持续的跨学科工作,实现了其预期目标。