Garegnani Luis Ignacio, Meza Nicolás, Rosón-Rodriguez Pablo, Escobar-Liquitay Camila Micaela, Arancibia Marcelo, Madrid Eva, Franco Juan Victor Ariel
Research Department, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies CIESAL, Universidad de Valparaíso, Cochrane Chile, Associate Centre Universidad de Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile.
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022 Feb;27(1):21-26. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111530. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
It is recommended that patients actively participate in clinical practice guideline (CPG) development, which allows consideration of their values and preferences and improves adherence to recommendations. The development of CPGs throughout Latin America is variable and diverse, and the inclusion of patients' participation is unknown.
To evaluate the methods of patients' participation in government-sponsored CPGs in Latin America, the type of CPG development and the use of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methods.
Cross-sectional study. We included CPGs developed over the last 10 years through a comprehensive hand search in official national government websites and biomedical databases.
The type of patients' participation was coded according to five predefined categories. We also report the proportion of application of GRADE methods.
We included 408 CPGs from 10 countries: 74% (n=303) were de novo development, 13%(n=55) used an adaptation method and 10%(n=41) used both adaptation and de novo methods. Only 45% (n=185) applied the GRADE approach, ranging from 14% (n=12) of CPGs in Brazil to 89% (n=56) of CPGs in Colombia. Only 23% (n=95) of CPGs included at least one method of patients' participation. Mexico was one of the largest CPG producers (100 CPGs), but none included methods of patients' participation; in turn, in countries with lower production of government-sponsored CPGs, patients' participation was found in almost 88%. Guidelines using the GRADE approach were more likely to use methods of patients' participation. These methods were highly variable: 46% (n=44) incorporated patients in the panel, 81% (n=77) searched for evidence about patients' values and preferences, 43% (n=39) used an external review of the draft recommendations by patients, 38% (n=36) used public comments, and 2% included other methods for stakeholders' participation.
Only one quarter of government-sponsored CPGs in the Latin American region incorporated a method for patients' participation, which varied considerably across the selected countries. These findings highlight the need to improve CPG development methods to systematically incorporate patients' values and preferences when drafting recommendations.
建议患者积极参与临床实践指南(CPG)的制定,这有助于考虑他们的价值观和偏好,并提高对建议的依从性。拉丁美洲各地CPG的制定情况各不相同且多种多样,患者参与的纳入情况尚不清楚。
评估拉丁美洲政府资助的CPG中患者参与的方法、CPG制定的类型以及推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法的使用情况。
横断面研究。我们通过在各国官方政府网站和生物医学数据库中进行全面的手工检索,纳入了过去10年制定的CPG。
根据五个预定义类别对患者参与的类型进行编码。我们还报告了GRADE方法的应用比例。
我们纳入了来自10个国家的408份CPG:74%(n = 303)是从头制定,13%(n = 55)采用改编方法,10%(n = 41)同时使用改编和从头制定方法。只有45%(n = 185)应用了GRADE方法,范围从巴西CPG的14%(n = 12)到哥伦比亚CPG的89%(n = 56)。只有23%(n = 95)的CPG纳入了至少一种患者参与方法。墨西哥是CPG产量最高的国家之一(100份CPG),但没有一份纳入患者参与方法;相反,在政府资助的CPG产量较低的国家,几乎88%的CPG有患者参与。使用GRADE方法的指南更有可能采用患者参与方法。这些方法差异很大:46%(n = 44)在专家小组中纳入患者,81%(n = 77)搜索有关患者价值观和偏好的证据,43%(n = 39)让患者对推荐草案进行外部审查,38%(n = 36)采用公众意见,2%包括其他利益相关者参与方法。
拉丁美洲地区政府资助的CPG中只有四分之一纳入了患者参与方法,在所选国家中差异很大。这些发现凸显了改进CPG制定方法的必要性,以便在起草建议时系统地纳入患者的价值观和偏好。