• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3 种核酸检测方法在 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断中的分析灵敏度。

Analytic Sensitivity of 3 Nucleic Acid Detection Assays in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;6(2):421-428. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa187.

DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfaa187
PMID:33674879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7665530/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcription PCR is the primary method to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the analytic sensitivity required is not well defined and it is unclear how available assays compare.

METHODS

For the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay (m2000; Abbott Molecular), we determined that it could detect viral concentrations as low as 26 copies/mL, we defined the relationship between cycle number and viral concentrations, and we tested naso- and oropharyngeal swab specimens from 8538 consecutive individuals. Using the m2000 as a reference assay method, we described the distribution of viral concentrations in these patients. We then used selected clinical specimens to determine the positive percent agreement of 2 other assays with more rapid turnaround times [Cepheid Xpert Xpress (GeneXpert; Cepheid); n = 27] and a laboratory developed test on the Luminex ARIES system [ARIES LDT (Luminex); n = 50] as a function of virus concentrations, from which we projected their false-negative rates in our patient population.

RESULTS

SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 27% (95% CI: 26%-28%) of all specimens. Estimated viral concentrations were widely distributed, and 17% (95% CI: 16%-19%) of positive individuals had viral concentrations <845 copies/mL. Positive percent agreement was strongly related to viral concentration, and reliable detection (i.e., ≥95%) was observed at concentrations >100 copies/mL for the GeneXpert but not the ARIES LDT, corresponding to projected false-negative rates of 4% (95% CI: 0%-21%) and 27% (95% CI: 11%-46%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial proportions of clinical specimens have low to moderate viral concentrations and may be missed by methods with less analytic sensitivity.

摘要

背景

逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)是诊断 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的主要方法。然而,目前尚不清楚所需的分析灵敏度是多少,也不清楚现有的检测方法如何进行比较。

方法

对于 Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 检测法(m2000;Abbott Molecular),我们确定它可以检测到低至 26 拷贝/ml 的病毒浓度,定义了循环数与病毒浓度之间的关系,并测试了 8538 例连续个体的鼻咽和口咽拭子标本。使用 m2000 作为参考检测方法,我们描述了这些患者中病毒浓度的分布。然后,我们使用选定的临床标本来确定另外两种具有更快周转时间的检测方法的阳性百分符合率[Cepheid Xpert Xpress(GeneXpert;Cepheid);n=27]和 Luminex ARIES 系统上的实验室开发检测法[ARIES LDT(Luminex);n=50],作为病毒浓度的函数,由此我们预测了它们在我们患者人群中的假阴性率。

结果

SARS-CoV-2 在所有标本中的检出率为 27%(95%CI:26%-28%)。估计的病毒浓度分布广泛,17%(95%CI:16%-19%)的阳性个体的病毒浓度<845 拷贝/ml。阳性百分符合率与病毒浓度密切相关,GeneXpert 可在浓度>100 拷贝/ml 时可靠检测(即≥95%),但 ARIES LDT 则不行,这分别对应于预测的假阴性率为 4%(95%CI:0%-21%)和 27%(95%CI:11%-46%)。

结论

大量临床标本的病毒浓度较低或中等,可能会被分析灵敏度较低的方法所遗漏。

相似文献

1
Analytic Sensitivity of 3 Nucleic Acid Detection Assays in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.3 种核酸检测方法在 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断中的分析灵敏度。
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;6(2):421-428. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa187.
2
Sample-to-Answer and Routine Real-Time RT-PCR: A Comparison of Different Platforms for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.样本到答案与常规实时逆转录聚合酶链反应:SARS-CoV-2检测不同平台的比较
J Mol Diagn. 2021 Jun;23(6):665-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Comparison of a Point-of-Care Assay and a High-Complexity Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)RNA的即时检测法与高复杂性检测法的比较
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;5(6):1307-1312. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa135.
4
Reverse Transcription Recombinase-Aided Amplification Assay With Lateral Flow Dipstick Assay for Rapid Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus.逆转录重组酶辅助扩增检测试剂盒结合侧向流试纸条用于快速检测 2019 新型冠状病毒。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Feb 1;11:613304. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.613304. eCollection 2021.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress and the Abbott ID NOW assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cepheid Xpert Xpress 和 Abbott ID NOW 检测试剂盒快速检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4523-4531. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26994. Epub 2021 May 3.
6
Analytical and Clinical Analysis of Two Automated Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Patient Populations.在大流行前和大流行期间的患者人群中对两种自动化抗 SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析的分析和临床分析。
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;6(2):441-450. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa204.
7
Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type.四项 SARS-CoV-2 核酸扩增检测(NAAT)平台的比较研究表明,ID NOW 平台的性能受到患者和标本类型的显著影响。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;99(1):115200. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115200. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
A needle in the haystack? Assessing the significance of envelope (E) gene-negative, nucleocapsid (N2) gene-positive SARS-CoV-2 detection by the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-COV-2 assay.大海捞针?评估 Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 检测中包膜(E)基因阴性、核衣壳(N2)基因阳性的 SARS-CoV-2 检测的意义。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104683. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104683. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Verification and Validation of SARS-CoV-2 Assay Performance on the Abbott 2000 and Alinity Systems.对 Abbott 2000 和 Alinity 系统上 SARS-CoV-2 检测性能的验证和确认。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.03119-20.
10
Clinical performance of Roche cobas 6800, Luminex ARIES, MiRXES Fortitude Kit 2.1, Altona RealStar, and Applied Biosystems TaqPath for SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swabs.罗氏 cobas 6800、Luminex ARIES、MiRXES Fortitude Kit 2.1、Altona RealStar 和 Applied Biosystems TaqPath 用于检测鼻咽拭子中 SARS-CoV-2 的临床性能。
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4603-4607. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26940. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons from SARS‑CoV‑2 and its variants (Review).SARS-CoV-2 及其变体的教训(综述)。
Mol Med Rep. 2022 Aug;26(2). doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12779. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Neurosurgical experiences of a Bengaluru teaching hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.班加罗尔一家教学医院在新冠疫情期间的神经外科手术经验。
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Jan 5;13:3. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1179_2021. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinical evaluation of the automated Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2, Alinity m SARS-CoV-2, and Alinity m Resp-4-Plex assays.雅培实时 SARS-CoV-2 自动化检测、Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 检测和 Alinity m Resp-4-Plex 检测的临床评估。
J Virol Methods. 2022 Jan;299:114338. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114338. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Analytical Performance Evaluation of Three Commercial Rapid Nucleic Acid Assays for SARS-CoV-2.三种用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的商用快速核酸检测方法的分析性能评估
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Aug 14;14:3169-3174. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S321227. eCollection 2021.
5
SARS-CoV-2 Genome from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.来自巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省的新冠病毒基因组。
ACS Omega. 2021 Mar 3;6(10):6588-6599. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05163. eCollection 2021 Mar 16.