Suppr超能文献

炸弹爆炸:四肢创伤的影像学表现、治疗和临床过程。

Bomb blast: imaging findings, treatment and clinical course of extremity traumas.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences-Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan Education and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.

Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences-Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan Education and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00421-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To describe the severity and types of blast-related extremity injuries and the presence of accompanying vascular injuries (VI) and amputation, and to identify the associated factors affecting the treatment management and clinical course.

METHODS

The study included 101 patients with extremity injuries caused by a bomb explosion. The radiographs and computed tomography angiographies of the patients were evaluated in terms of injury patterns, presence of penetrating fragments and fractures, and localization (upper or lower extremity) and type (open or closed) of injury. The Gustilo-Anderson classification was used for open fractures. According to their severity, open fractures classified as types 1 and 2 were included in Group 1 and those classified as type 3A, 3B and 3C in Group 2.

RESULTS

As a result of blast exposure, 101 (57.7%) patients had extremity injuries, of which 76 (75.2%) presented with at least one fracture. Of the total of 103 fractures, nine (8.8%) were closed and 94 (91.2%) were open. Thirty-eight (40.4%) of the open fractures were located in the upper extremities, and 56 (59.6%) in the lower extremities and pelvis. Open fractures were most frequently localized in the femur (n = 20; 21.2%), followed by the tibia (n = 18; 19.1%). The majority of patients with open fractures were in Group 1 (71.4%). The duration of hospital stay was longer in Group 2 (12.1 ± 5.8 vs. 6.3 ± 6.7 days, p <  0.0001, respectively). Mortality among patients in Group 2 (45.0%) was significantly higher than in Group 1 (8.0%) (p <  0.0001). Similarly, the injury severity score (ISS) was higher in Group 2 (median 20 vs. 9, p <  0.0001). VI was present in 13 (12.9%) of all patients, and amputation in seven (7.9%).

CONCLUSION

The presence of severe open fractures, VI, and high ISS score can be considered as important factors that increase morbidity and mortality. In extremity traumas, through the secondary blast mechanism, contaminated-fragmented tissue injuries occur. Therefore, we believe that it will be beneficial to apply damage control surgery in places with low socioeconomic level and poor hygienic conditions.

摘要

背景

描述爆炸相关四肢损伤的严重程度和类型,以及伴随的血管损伤(VI)和截肢,并确定影响治疗管理和临床过程的相关因素。

方法

该研究纳入了 101 例因炸弹爆炸导致的四肢损伤患者。对患者的 X 线片和 CT 血管造影进行评估,包括损伤类型、是否存在穿透性碎片和骨折,以及损伤的定位(上肢或下肢)和类型(开放性或闭合性)。采用 Gustilo-Anderson 分类法对开放性骨折进行分类。根据其严重程度,将分类为 1 型和 2 型的开放性骨折归入组 1,分类为 3A、3B 和 3C 型的归入组 2。

结果

由于爆炸暴露,101 例(57.7%)患者出现了四肢损伤,其中 76 例(75.2%)至少有一处骨折。在总共 103 处骨折中,9 处(8.8%)为闭合性,94 处(91.2%)为开放性。38 处(40.4%)开放性骨折位于上肢,56 处(59.6%)位于下肢和骨盆。开放性骨折最常发生于股骨(n=20;21.2%),其次是胫骨(n=18;19.1%)。大多数开放性骨折患者属于组 1(71.4%)。组 2 的住院时间较长(12.1±5.8 比 6.3±6.7 天,p<0.0001)。组 2 的死亡率(45.0%)明显高于组 1(8.0%)(p<0.0001)。同样,组 2 的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)也更高(中位数 20 比 9,p<0.0001)。所有患者中 13 例(12.9%)存在血管损伤,7 例(7.9%)需要截肢。

结论

严重的开放性骨折、血管损伤和高 ISS 评分可视为增加发病率和死亡率的重要因素。在四肢创伤中,通过二次爆炸机制,会发生污染性碎片组织损伤。因此,我们认为在社会经济水平低、卫生条件差的地方应用损伤控制性手术将是有益的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ce4/7937268/29af8783c44d/12873_2021_421_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验