• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高西悉尼地区癌症多学科团队的表现:三年经验。

Improving Cancer MDT performance in Western Sydney - three years' experience.

机构信息

Sydney West - Translational Cancer Research Centre, Western Sydney Local Health District, PO Box 533 Wentworthville, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.

Tumour Program Strengthening Initiative innovation manager (2019), Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06203-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06203-y
PMID:33676492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7937192/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are now considered an essential part of cancer care decision-making, how they perform varies widely. The authors hypothesised that a comprehensive, multipronged improvement program, and associated annual member survey, could strengthen MDT performance across a whole cancer service.

METHODS

The study comprised the introduction of a structured program, the Tumour Program Strengthening Initiative (TPSI) linked with an annual survey of member's perceptions of their performance. Three iterations of the survey have been completed (2017, 2018 and 2019). Generalised estimating equations (GEEs) were used to test for a difference in the proportion of positive survey responses between 2017 and 2019 adjusted for team clustering.

RESULTS

Twelve teams participated in TPSI. One hundred twenty-nine, 118 and 146 members completed the survey in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Of the 17 questions that were asked in all three years, nine showed significant improvement and, of these, five were highly significant. Documenting consensus, developing Terms of Reference (TORs), establishing referral criteria and referring to clinical practice guidelines showed most improvement. Questions related to patient considerations, professional development and quality improvement (QI) activities showed no significant change.

CONCLUSIONS

TPSI resulted in sustained and significant improvement. The MDT survey not only allowed MDT members to identify their strengths and weaknesses but also provided insights for management to flag priority areas for further support. Overall program improvement reflected the strengthening of the weakest teams as well as further improvement in highly performing MDTs. Importantly, the initiative has the potential to achieve behaviour change amongst clinicians.

摘要

背景

虽然多学科团队(MDTs)现在被认为是癌症治疗决策的重要组成部分,但它们的表现差异很大。作者假设,一个全面的、多管齐下的改进计划,以及相关的年度成员调查,可以加强整个癌症服务的 MDT 表现。

方法

该研究包括引入一个结构化的计划,即肿瘤项目强化倡议(TPSI),并与成员对其表现的年度调查相结合。已经完成了三次调查(2017 年、2018 年和 2019 年)。使用广义估计方程(GEE)来检验 2017 年至 2019 年之间,在考虑团队聚类的情况下,积极调查结果的比例是否存在差异。

结果

12 个团队参与了 TPSI。分别有 129、118 和 146 名成员在 2017、2018 和 2019 年完成了调查。在所有三年中都提出的 17 个问题中,有 9 个显示出显著的改善,其中 5 个是非常显著的。记录共识、制定职权范围(TORs)、建立转诊标准和参考临床实践指南显示出最大的改善。与患者考虑、专业发展和质量改进(QI)活动相关的问题没有显示出显著的变化。

结论

TPSI 带来了持续和显著的改善。MDT 调查不仅使 MDT 成员能够识别他们的优势和劣势,还为管理层提供了见解,以确定需要进一步支持的优先领域。总体项目改进反映了对最薄弱团队的加强,以及高绩效 MDT 的进一步改进。重要的是,该倡议有可能在临床医生中实现行为改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be2/7937192/f1a847baad14/12913_2021_6203_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be2/7937192/b3417d763b73/12913_2021_6203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be2/7937192/f1a847baad14/12913_2021_6203_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be2/7937192/b3417d763b73/12913_2021_6203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be2/7937192/f1a847baad14/12913_2021_6203_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Cancer MDT performance in Western Sydney - three years' experience.提高西悉尼地区癌症多学科团队的表现:三年经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06203-y.
2
A tool to improve the performance of multidisciplinary teams in cancer care.一种提高癌症护理多学科团队绩效的工具。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 May 31;8(2):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000435. eCollection 2019.
3
Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in practice: Results from a multi-institutional quantitative survey and implications for policy change.癌症多学科团队会议的实际情况:一项多机构定量调查的结果及对政策变革的启示。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12765. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
4
Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science.在癌症护理的多学科团队中嵌入持续质量改进流程:探索质量与实施科学之间的界限。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Jul;41(3):291-296. doi: 10.1071/AH16052.
5
A multi-method evaluation of the implementation of a cancer teamwork assessment and feedback improvement programme (MDT-FIT) across a large integrated cancer system.多方法评估在大型综合癌症系统中实施癌症团队协作评估和反馈改进计划(MDT-FIT)的情况。
Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1240-1252. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3719. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments.多学科癌症团队的质量改进:对团队合作和临床决策的调查以及评估的交叉验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3535-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1773-5. Epub 2011 May 19.
7
Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a self-assessment tool to improve cancer multidisciplinary teamwork.开发和测试 TEAM(团队评估和评估工具),这是一种自我评估工具,旨在改善癌症多学科团队合作。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4019-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2493-1. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
8
Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study.提高泌尿外科癌症护理多学科团队会议效率和效用的策略:一项调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 8;14:377. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-377.
9
The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership?英国多学科癌症团队中肿瘤学家的作用:团队领导的未开发资源?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01507.x. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
10
Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective.影响癌症多学科团队决策和决策实施的因素:提供者视角的访谈研究。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):389-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.02.026. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review.影响肿瘤多学科团队会议质量和功能的因素:系统评价的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08112-0.

本文引用的文献

1
A tool to improve the performance of multidisciplinary teams in cancer care.一种提高癌症护理多学科团队绩效的工具。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 May 31;8(2):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000435. eCollection 2019.
2
Successful strategies in implementing a multidisciplinary team working in the care of patients with cancer: an overview and synthesis of the available literature.实施多学科团队护理癌症患者的成功策略:现有文献综述与综合分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Jan 19;11:49-61. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S117945. eCollection 2018.
3
Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in practice: Results from a multi-institutional quantitative survey and implications for policy change.
癌症多学科团队会议的实际情况:一项多机构定量调查的结果及对政策变革的启示。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12765. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
4
Development and testing of the cancer multidisciplinary team meeting observational tool (MDT-MOT).癌症多学科团队会议观察工具(MDT-MOT)的开发与测试。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):332-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw030. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
5
The Effects of a Multidisciplinary Care Conference on the Quality and Cost of Care for Lung Cancer Patients.多学科护理会议对肺癌患者护理质量和成本的影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1834-8; discussion 1838. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.056. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
6
Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness.评估癌症护理团队的有效性。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):239-46. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.003350. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
7
Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study.提高泌尿外科癌症护理多学科团队会议效率和效用的策略:一项调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 8;14:377. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-377.
8
Validation of team performance assessment of multidisciplinary tumor boards.多学科肿瘤委员会团队绩效评估的验证。
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):891-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
9
Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients.提高多学科肿瘤委员会的决策制定能力:对 1421 例患者进行多组分干预的前瞻性纵向评估。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Sep;217(3):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
10
Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a self-assessment tool to improve cancer multidisciplinary teamwork.开发和测试 TEAM(团队评估和评估工具),这是一种自我评估工具,旨在改善癌症多学科团队合作。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4019-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2493-1. Epub 2012 Jul 21.