Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4003, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, P.O. Box, CH-4003, Basel, Switzerland.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 6;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00684-3.
Between 2014 and 2016, Switzerland's access to some of the EU funding was limited after a referendum against mass immigration was accepted and the country refused to sign the free movement accord to the EU's newest member, Croatia. It is well documented that Switzerland has suffered from a drop in participation, funding and a decrease in consortium lead positions. However, there is no account of the consequences on institutional level. We therefore aimed at describing the immediate- and longer-term impact of the partial association status to the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) and to identify key strategies for minimizing institutional damage during a limited access period to a key regional funding source. A quantitative analysis of the institute's grants database, from 2007 to 2019, did not show any clear trends related to the partial association status of Switzerland for funding and projects awarded. The qualitative outcomes changed along the timeline assessed; whereas in 2014 a range of negative effects were stated by Swiss TPH researchers, a survey conducted in 2019 with Swiss TPH applicants and project partners to Horizon 2020, revealed that most project leaders felt that the partial association did neither affect their external partners' willingness to collaborate nor Swiss TPH's role in the proposal or consortium. On the other hand, the institutional strategic goal of taking on consortia leads was delayed by several years as a direct consequence of the partial association. Also, the exclusion from European research networks and the lack of consultation of expertise by the European partner institutions was widely seen as damaging. A policy of favouring long-term partnerships over ad-hoc collaborations, along with constant and trustful communication, as immediate mitigation measure, helped averting some of the reputational and access damage. Moreover, the Swiss TPH business model based on a three-way strategy of research, education and services has proven highly viable allowing to build a large pool of potential funding sources internationally, resulting in relative resilience in terms of income lost.
2014 年至 2016 年期间,瑞士因全民公决反对大规模移民以及拒绝签署欧盟最新成员国克罗地亚的人员自由流动协议,其获得部分欧盟资金的渠道受到限制。有大量文献记载瑞士在参与度、资金和财团牵头地位方面均有所下降。然而,对于体制层面的影响却没有相关记录。因此,我们旨在描述瑞士热带与公共卫生研究所(Swiss TPH)的部分关联地位对其造成的直接和长期影响,并确定在有限的时间内获取区域关键资金来源时,将机构损害降到最低的关键战略。对该机构 2007 年至 2019 年的赠款数据库进行的定量分析并未显示出瑞士部分关联地位对资金和授予项目的任何明确趋势。定性结果随时间线而变化;2014 年,Swiss TPH 研究人员表示了一系列负面影响,而 2019 年对 Swiss TPH 申请方和 Horizon 2020 项目合作伙伴进行的调查显示,大多数项目负责人认为部分关联并未影响其外部合作伙伴的合作意愿,也未影响 Swiss TPH 在提案或财团中的角色。另一方面,由于部分关联,机构承担财团牵头人的战略目标被推迟了数年。此外,被排除在欧洲研究网络之外,以及欧洲伙伴机构缺乏对专业知识的咨询,被广泛视为具有破坏性。作为即时缓解措施,优先考虑长期伙伴关系而非临时合作的政策,以及持续和信任的沟通,有助于避免一些声誉和准入方面的损害。此外,Swiss TPH 基于研究、教育和服务三管齐下的商业模式已被证明具有高度可行性,使其能够在国际上建立一个庞大的潜在资金来源池,从而在收入损失方面具有相对的弹性。