• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多点左心室起搏对血流动力学参数和功能状态的影响:HUMVEE 单臂临床试验(NCT03189368)。

Multipoint left ventricular pacing effects on hemodynamic parameters and functional status: HUMVEE single-arm clinical trial (NCT03189368).

机构信息

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;63:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2021.02.012
PMID:33677032
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the capacity of optimized multipoint pacing (MPP) over optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), in terms of clinical, functional, and echocardiographic parameters among patients with dyssynchronous heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Eighty patients (Caucasian, 77.5% male, 68.4 ± 10.1 years, and 53.8% ischemic cardiomyopathy) sequentially received optimized CRT and optimized MPP over 6- and 12-month periods in a single-arm clinical trial. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic assessment was conducted at baseline and after the completion of each step.

RESULTS

Significant additive effects of optimized MPP over optimized CRT were noted with regard to 6-min walking distance (baseline/optCRT/optMPP: 293 ± 120 m vs 367 ± 94 m vs 405 ± 129 m and p < 0.001), NYHA class (2.36 vs 2.19 vs 1.45 and p < 0.001), VTI (14.25 ± 3.2 cm vs 16.2 ± 4 cm vs 17.5 ± 3.4 cm and p < 0.001), stroke volume (48 ± 13.5 ml vs 55 ± 15 ml vs 59 ± 15 ml and p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (29% ± 7.1% vs 33% ± 7.3% vs 37% ± 7.7% and p < 0.001), maximal left atrial volume (77.2 ± 34.2 ml vs 74.2 ± 39.5 ml vs 67.7 ± 32 ml and p = 0.02), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (35.9 mmHg vs 33.5 mmHg vs 31 mmHg and p < 0.001), and right ventricular strain (-8.3% ± 6.9% vs -8.8% ± 6.6% vs -11.8% ± 6.1% and p = 0.022). With regard to VAC, stroke work (SW), and CP as percentages of maximal, there was a significant difference detected as compared to baseline for both CRT and MPP. Additive effects persisted only if suitable MPP dipoles were present. Exploratory analysis revealed that ischemic cardiomyopathy continued to exhibit significant differences that favor MPP, whereas nonischemic cardiomyopathy had similar findings with regard to total left atrial strain and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimized MPP showed significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters and ventricular function in patients with HF over optimized CRT. The beneficial effect was more prominent in men and in those with rather reduced LVEF, consistent with findings that suggest a beneficial trend in VAC and CP with more homogeneous depolarization offered by optimized MPP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估优化多点起搏(MPP)相对于优化心脏再同步治疗(CRT)在不同心功能失同步心衰患者中的临床、功能和超声心动图参数方面的能力。

方法

80 例患者(白种人,77.5%男性,68.4±10.1 岁,53.8%缺血性心肌病)在一项单臂临床试验中先后接受了 6 个月和 12 个月的优化 CRT 和优化 MPP。在基线和每个步骤完成后进行临床、实验室和超声心动图评估。

结果

与优化 CRT 相比,优化 MPP 具有显著的附加效应,表现为 6 分钟步行距离(基线/optCRT/optMPP:293±120m 比 367±94m 比 405±129m,p<0.001)、NYHA 分级(2.36 比 2.19 比 1.45,p<0.001)、VTI(14.25±3.2cm 比 16.2±4cm 比 17.5±3.4cm,p<0.001)、每搏量(48±13.5ml 比 55±15ml 比 59±15ml,p<0.001)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)(29%±7.1%比 33%±7.3%比 37%±7.7%,p<0.001)、最大左心房容积(77.2±34.2ml 比 74.2±39.5ml 比 67.7±32ml,p=0.02)、肺动脉收缩压(35.9mmHg 比 33.5mmHg 比 31mmHg,p<0.001)和右心室应变(-8.3%±6.9%比-8.8%±6.6%比-11.8%±6.1%,p=0.022)。就 VAC、SW 和 CP 作为最大百分比而言,CRT 和 MPP 均有显著改善。只有在存在合适的 MPP 偶极子的情况下,附加效应才会持续。探索性分析显示,缺血性心肌病继续表现出有利于 MPP 的显著差异,而非缺血性心肌病在总左心房应变和生活质量方面具有相似的发现。

结论

与优化 CRT 相比,优化 MPP 在心衰患者的血液动力学参数和心室功能方面显示出显著改善。这种有益效果在男性和左心室射血分数较低的患者中更为明显,这与 VAC 和 CP 的有益趋势一致,因为优化 MPP 提供了更均匀的去极化。

相似文献

1
Multipoint left ventricular pacing effects on hemodynamic parameters and functional status: HUMVEE single-arm clinical trial (NCT03189368).多点左心室起搏对血流动力学参数和功能状态的影响:HUMVEE 单臂临床试验(NCT03189368)。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;63:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Heart failure study of multipoint pacing effects on ventriculoarterial coupling: Rationale and design of the HUMVEE trial.多点起搏对心室动脉耦联影响的心力衰竭研究:HUMVEE试验的原理与设计
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 May;23(3):e12510. doi: 10.1111/anec.12510. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
3
Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing.多点左心室起搏与大解剖分离可改善对常规双心室起搏有反应和无反应者的逆向重构和对心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Feb;109(2):183-193. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01499-7. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.在单个冠状窦分支中进行多点左心室起搏可改善心脏再同步治疗的中期超声心动图表现及临床反应。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/jce.12513. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year.左心室起搏部位优化联合多点起搏可改善1年时的心脏重构及心脏再同步治疗的临床反应。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Aug;13(8):1644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.05.015.
6
Characterization of ventricular activation pattern and acute hemodynamics during multipoint left ventricular pacing.多点左心室起搏时心室激动模式和急性血液动力学特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Aug;12(8):1762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.029. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
7
Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.多点左心室起搏可改善心脏再同步治疗的反应,无论是否进行压力-容积环优化:两种不同程控策略的长期疗效比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;54(2):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0480-6. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
8
Long-term reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing: A feasibility study of noninvasive hemodynamics-guided device programming.多部位起搏心脏再同步治疗的长期逆向重构:非侵入性血流动力学指导的器械程控可行性研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1766-1774. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
9
Clinical and economic impact of multipoint left ventricular pacing: A comparative analysis from the Italian registry on multipoint pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP).多点左心室起搏的临床和经济影响:来自心脏再同步治疗多点起搏意大利注册研究(IRON-MPP)的比较分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1166-1174. doi: 10.1111/jce.14433. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP).多点起搏通过四极左心室导线:心脏再同步治疗中多点左心室起搏的意大利注册研究(IRON-MPP)的初步结果。
Europace. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):1170-1177. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw094.

引用本文的文献

1
Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing as Alternative Approach in Cases of Biventricular Pacing Failure.多点左心室起搏作为双心室起搏失败病例的替代方法。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 7;14(4):1065. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041065.
2
Multipoint left ventricular pacing as an addition to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a bridge to the holy grail?多点左心室起搏作为心脏再同步治疗的补充:通往圣杯的桥梁?
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Aug 15;11(4):429-440. eCollection 2021.