Suppr超能文献

年轻人面临着另一个医疗障碍:保险公司限制质子治疗的使用。

Young Adult Populations Face Yet Another Barrier to Care With Insurers: Limited Access to Proton Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Aug 1;110(5):1496-1504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.049. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Young patients, including pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (YA) patients, are most likely to benefit from the reduced integral dose of proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) resulting in fewer late toxicities and secondary malignancies. This study sought to examine insurance approval and appeal outcomes for PBT among YA patients compared with pediatric patients at a large-volume proton therapy center.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a cross-sectional cohort study of 284 consecutive patients aged 0 to 39 years for whom PBT was recommended in 2018 through 2019. Pediatric patients were defined as aged 0 to 18 years and YA patients 19 to 39 years. Rates of approval, denials, and decision timelines were calculated. Tumor type and location were also evaluated as factors that may influence insurance decisions.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients (73%) were approved for PBT at initial request. YA patients (n = 68/143, 48%) were significantly less likely to receive initial approval compared with pediatric patients (n = 139/141; 99%) (P < .001). Even after 47% (n = 35 of 75) of the PBT denials for YA patients were overturned, YAs had a significantly lower final PBT approval (72% vs pediatric 99%; P < .001). The median wait time was also significantly longer for YA patients (median, 8 days; interquartile range [IQR] 3-17 vs median, 2 days; IQR, 0-6; P < .001). In those patients requiring an appeal, the median wait time was 16 days (IQR, 9-25).

CONCLUSION

Given the decades of survivorship of YA patients, PBT is an important tool to reduce late toxicities and secondary malignancies. Compared with pediatric patients, YA patients are significantly less likely to receive insurance approval for PBT. Insurance denials and subsequent appeal requests result in significant delays for YA patients. Insurers need to re-examine their policies to include expedited decisions and appeals and removal of arbitrary age cutoffs so that YA patients can gain easier access to PBT. Furthermore, consensus guidelines encouraging greater PBT access for YA may be warranted from both medical societies and/or AYA experts.

摘要

目的

质子束放射治疗(PBT)的积分剂量降低,年轻患者(包括儿科、青少年和青年患者)的获益最大,从而导致更少的迟发性毒性和继发性恶性肿瘤。本研究旨在比较大剂量质子治疗中心的青年患者与儿科患者的 PBT 保险审批和上诉结果。

方法与材料

我们对 2018 年至 2019 年期间建议行 PBT 的 284 例 0 至 39 岁连续患者进行了一项横断面队列研究。儿科患者定义为 0 至 18 岁,青年患者为 19 至 39 岁。计算了批准、拒绝和决策时间线的比例。还评估了肿瘤类型和位置,作为可能影响保险决策的因素。

结果

共有 207 例(73%)患者在初次申请时获得 PBT 批准。与儿科患者(n=139/141;99%)相比,青年患者(n=68/143;48%)初次批准的可能性显著降低(P<.001)。即使在 75 例(47%)青年患者的 PBT 拒绝中有 35 例被推翻,青年患者的最终 PBT 批准率仍显著较低(72%比儿科患者的 99%;P<.001)。青年患者的中位等待时间也显著延长(中位数,8 天;四分位距[IQR],3-17 比中位数,2 天;IQR,0-6;P<.001)。在需要上诉的患者中,中位等待时间为 16 天(IQR,9-25)。

结论

鉴于青年患者的几十年生存时间,PBT 是降低迟发性毒性和继发性恶性肿瘤的重要工具。与儿科患者相比,青年患者接受 PBT 保险批准的可能性显著降低。保险拒绝和随后的上诉请求导致青年患者的显著延迟。保险公司需要重新审查其政策,包括加快决策和上诉程序,并取消任意年龄限制,以便青年患者更容易获得 PBT。此外,医学协会和/或青少年和青年专家可能需要制定鼓励增加青年患者 PBT 机会的共识指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验