Gracie Jayden, Jimenez Rachel, Winkfield Karen M
Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Oct 23;10(1):101654. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101654. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Despite its high cost-effectiveness, radiation oncology faces the greatest prior authorization (PA) burden of any medical specialty. Insurance denials and resulting treatment delays have been documented across several treatment modalities, including stereotactic body radiation, intensity modulated radiation, and proton therapy. Although insurance companies suggest that PA is intended to control health care spending and ensure the implementation of evidence-based practice, the number of radiation treatment plans reviewed by the PA process that result in changes is quite low. Yet, the cost to patients, providers, and the health care system is rising.The increased administrative work required to address the appeal process, including the development of radiation plan comparisons, results in lost productivity of radiation staff and increased clinic costs that are not currently reimbursed. Treatment delays from PA may elevate patient anxiety and affect their ability to enroll in clinical trials, resulting in decreased quality of care. As a result of possible harm to patients, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a ruling that mandates increased transparency of insurers' requirements, decreased allowable time for arriving at PA decisions, and a more efficient electronic communication system to address the time and resource burden of PA.
This article summarizes key discussions from the literature and provides recommendations to help mitigate insurance PA strain.
These recommendations broadly address the following key areas: (1) omission of PA for routine care and clinical trials, (2) implementation of efficient, streamlined electronic peer-to-peer communication, (3) increased transparency of insurance requirements and rationale for denials, and (4) decreased time allowances for PA decisions.
Policy reform focused on evidence-driven treatment coverage, reduction of the proportion of cases requiring PA, and a simplified, timely insurance appeal process is necessary to ensure optimal cancer care for patients requiring radiation therapy as part of their cancer journey.
尽管放射肿瘤学具有很高的成本效益,但在所有医学专科中,它面临的预先授权(PA)负担最大。在包括立体定向体部放疗、调强放疗和质子治疗在内的多种治疗方式中,都有保险拒付及由此导致治疗延迟的记录。尽管保险公司表示,预先授权旨在控制医疗保健支出并确保循证实践的实施,但经预先授权流程审核后导致变更的放射治疗计划数量相当少。然而,患者、提供者和医疗保健系统的成本却在不断上升。处理上诉过程所需的行政工作增加,包括制定放疗计划比较,导致放射工作人员的生产力损失以及诊所成本增加,而这些成本目前并未得到报销。预先授权导致的治疗延迟可能会加剧患者的焦虑,并影响他们参与临床试验的能力,从而导致护理质量下降。由于可能对患者造成伤害,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心制定了一项规定,要求保险公司提高要求的透明度,缩短做出预先授权决定的允许时间,并建立更高效电子通信系统,以应对预先授权带来的时间和资源负担。
本文总结了文献中的关键讨论内容,并提出了有助于减轻保险预先授权压力的建议。
这些建议广泛涉及以下关键领域:(1)对常规护理和临床试验省略预先授权;(2)实施高效、简化的电子对等沟通;(3)提高保险要求和拒付理由的透明度;(4)减少预先授权决定的时间津贴。
聚焦于循证驱动的治疗覆盖范围、减少需要预先授权的病例比例以及简化、及时的保险上诉流程的政策改革,对于确保癌症患者在其癌症治疗过程中接受放射治疗时能获得最佳护理是必要的。