Suppr超能文献

生理应激指数不能可靠地识别有达到热耐受极限风险的个体。

The physiological strain index does not reliably identify individuals at risk of reaching a thermal tolerance limit.

机构信息

Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.

Department of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Jun;121(6):1701-1713. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04642-3. Epub 2021 Mar 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The physiological strain index (PSI) was developed to assess individuals' heat strain, yet evidence supporting its use to identify individuals at potential risk of reaching a thermal tolerance limit (TTL) is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether PSI can identify individuals at risk of reaching a TTL.

METHODS

Fifteen females and 21 males undertook a total of 136 trials, each consisting of two 40-60 minute periods of treadmill walking separated by ~ 15 minutes rest, wearing permeable or impermeable clothing, in a range of climatic conditions. Heart rate (HR), skin temperature (T), rectal temperature (T), temperature sensation (TS) and thermal comfort (TC) were measured throughout. Various forms of the PSI-index were assessed including the original PSI, PSI, adaptive-PSI (aPSI) and a version comprised of a measure of heat storage (PSI). Final physiological and PSI values and their rate of change (ROC) over a trial and in the last 10 minutes of a trial were compared between trials completed (C, 101 trials) and those terminated prematurely (TTL, 35 trials).

RESULTS

Final PSI, PSI, aPSI, PSI did not differ between TTL and C (p > 0.05). However, differences between TTL and C occurred in final T, T-T, TS, TC and ROC in PSI, T, T and HR (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest the PSI, in the various forms, does not reliably identify individuals at imminent risk of reaching their TTL and its validity as a physiological safety index is therefore questionable. However, a physiological-perceptual strain index may provide a more valid measure.

摘要

目的

生理应激指数(PSI)旨在评估个体的热应激水平,但目前支持其用于识别可能达到热耐受极限(TTL)个体的证据有限。本研究旨在评估 PSI 是否可以识别有达到 TTL 风险的个体。

方法

15 名女性和 21 名男性共进行了 136 次试验,每次试验包括两个 40-60 分钟的跑步机行走期,中间间隔约 15 分钟的休息时间,穿着透气或不透气的衣服,在一系列气候条件下进行。在整个过程中测量心率(HR)、皮肤温度(T)、直肠温度(T)、温度感觉(TS)和热舒适度(TC)。评估了 PSI 指数的各种形式,包括原始 PSI、PSI、自适应 PSI(aPSI)和包含热储存测量的版本(PSI)。在试验期间和试验最后 10 分钟内比较了完成试验(C,101 次试验)和提前终止试验(TTL,35 次试验)的最终生理和 PSI 值及其变化率(ROC)。

结果

在 TTL 和 C 之间,最终 PSI、PSI、aPSI 和 PSI 没有差异(p > 0.05)。然而,在 TTL 和 C 之间,最终 T、T-T、TS、TC 和 PSI 的 ROC、T、T 和 HR 发生了差异(p < 0.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,PSI 的各种形式并不能可靠地识别即将达到 TTL 的个体,因此其作为生理安全指数的有效性值得怀疑。然而,生理-知觉应激指数可能提供更有效的衡量标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2891/8144153/4d7a0e064754/421_2021_4642_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验