Department of Landscape and Biodiversity, The Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Klæbuveien 153, Trondheim 7031, Norway.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 26;376(1823):20190745. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0745. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
Studies in natural populations are essential to understand the evolutionary ecology of senescence and terminal allocation. While there are an increasing number of studies investigating late-life variation in different life-history traits of wild populations, little is known about these patterns in social behaviour. We used long-term individual based data on yellow-bellied marmots () to quantify how affiliative social behaviours and different life-history traits vary with age and in the last year of life, and how patterns compare between the two. We found that some social behaviours and all life-history traits varied with age, whereas terminal last year of life effects were only observed in life-history traits. Our results imply that affiliative social behaviours do not act as a mechanism to adjust allocation among traits when close to death, and highlight the importance of adopting an integrative approach, studying late-life variation and senescence across multiple different traits, to allow the identification of potential trade-offs. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ageing and sociality: why, when and how does sociality change ageing patterns?'
研究自然种群对于理解衰老和终末分配的进化生态学至关重要。虽然越来越多的研究调查了野生种群在不同生命史特征方面的老年期变化,但对于社会行为的这些模式却知之甚少。我们使用了关于黄腹旱獭()的长期个体基础数据,来量化亲社会行为和不同生命史特征如何随年龄和生命的最后一年而变化,以及这两种变化模式如何进行比较。我们发现,一些社会行为和所有生命史特征都随年龄而变化,而终末的生命最后一年的影响仅在生命史特征中观察到。我们的结果表明,当接近死亡时,亲社会行为并不能作为一种在特征之间进行分配调整的机制,并强调了采用综合方法的重要性,即研究多个不同特征的老年期变化和衰老,以确定潜在的权衡。本文是主题为“衰老和社会性:为什么、何时以及社会性如何改变衰老模式?”的一部分。