Laboratory of Human Ecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Japan.
Sanitation Value Chain Project, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan.
Glob Health Promot. 2022 Sep;29(3):66-76. doi: 10.1177/1757975921995713. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) factors are responsible for 11.4% of deaths in Zambia, making WASH a key public health concern. Despite annual waterborne disease outbreaks in the nation's peri-urban (slum) settlements being linked to poor WASH, few studies have proactively analysed and conceptualised peri-urban WASH and its maintaining factors. Our study aimed to (a) establish residents' definition of peri-urban WASH and their WASH priorities; and (b) use ecological theory to analyse the peri-urban WASH ecosystem, highlighting maintaining factors. Our study incorporated 16 young people (aged 17-24) residing in peri-urban Lusaka, Zambia in a photovoice exercise. Participants took photographs answering the framing question: 'What is WASH in your community?'. Then, through contextualisation and basic codifying, participants told the stories of their photographs and made posters to summarise problems and WASH priorities. Participant contextualisation and codifying further underwent theoretical thematic analysis to pinpoint causal factors alongside key players, dissecting the peri-urban WASH ecosystem via the five-tier ecological theory ranging from intrapersonal to public policy levels. Via ecological theory, peri-urban WASH was defined as: (a) a poor practice (intrapersonal, interpersonal); (b) a health hazard (community norm); (c) substandard and unregulated (public policy, organisational); and (d) offering hope for change (intrapersonal, interpersonal). Linked to these themes, participant findings revealed a community level gap, with public policy level standards, regulations and implementation having minimal impact on overall peri-urban WASH and public health due to shallow community engagement and poor acknowledgement of the WASH realities of high-density locations. Rather than a top-down approach, participants recommended increased government-resident collaboration, offering residents more ownership and empowerment for intervention, implementation and defending of preferred peri-urban WASH standards.
水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)因素是赞比亚 11.4%死亡的原因,因此 WASH 是一个主要的公共卫生关注点。尽管该国城乡结合部(贫民窟)居民每年都会爆发与 WASH 条件差有关的水源性疾病,但很少有研究主动分析和概念化城乡结合部的 WASH 及其维持因素。我们的研究旨在:(a) 确定居民对城乡结合部 WASH 的定义及其 WASH 重点;(b) 使用生态理论分析城乡结合部的 WASH 生态系统,突出维持因素。我们的研究纳入了 16 名居住在赞比亚卢萨卡城乡结合部的年轻人(年龄在 17-24 岁之间),进行了一次摄影发声活动。参与者拍摄了回答框架问题的照片:“你的社区中的 WASH 是什么?”然后,通过情境化和基本编码,参与者讲述了他们照片的故事,并制作了海报来总结问题和 WASH 重点。参与者的情境化和编码进一步进行了理论主题分析,以确定因果因素以及关键参与者,通过从个人到公共政策层面的五层次生态理论剖析城乡结合部的 WASH 生态系统。通过生态理论,城乡结合部的 WASH 被定义为:(a) 一种不良做法(个人内部、人际间);(b) 一种健康危害(社区规范);(c) 标准低且不受监管(公共政策、组织);(d) 为变革提供希望(个人内部、人际间)。与这些主题相关联,参与者的发现揭示了社区层面的差距,由于社区参与度低,以及对高密度地区 WASH 现实的认识不足,公共政策层面的标准、法规和执行对整体城乡结合部 WASH 和公共卫生的影响微乎其微。参与者建议增加政府与居民的合作,而不是采取自上而下的方法,为居民提供更多的所有权和赋权,以干预、实施和捍卫首选的城乡结合部 WASH 标准。