• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[法国急性肿瘤学情况下维持生命治疗的 withhold 或撤除:历史与监管方面] (注:“withhold”此处可能是指“ withhold treatment”即“ withhold 治疗”,翻译时需结合医学语境准确理解,这里直接保留英文是因为不确定具体合适的中文表述,仅按要求翻译原文)

[Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in acute oncology situations: History and regulatory aspects in France].

作者信息

Aelbrecht-Meurisse Capucine, Ryckewaert Thomas, Pannier Diane, Gamblin Vincent, Garcia Vincent, Aelbrecht Stéphane, Penel Nicolas

机构信息

Centre Oscar Lambret, département d'oncologie médicale, 3, rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000 Lille, France.

Centre Oscar Lambret, département d'oncologie médicale, 3, rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000 Lille, France.

出版信息

Bull Cancer. 2021 Apr;108(4):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.11.020. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.11.020
PMID:33678409
Abstract

The management of oncology patients, especially hospitalized patients, can lead to almost daily discussions regarding therapeutic limitations. Here, we review the history and propose a summary of the texts framing the notion of "withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment" in oncology practice in France. This decision is regulated by the Claeys-Léonetti Law of February 2, 2016 recommending a collegial discussion and its documentation in the medical record. The decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments is the subject of discussion between the patient, his physicians and his family and may take place at any time during his management. The work of intensive-care physicians provides many useful recommendations for acute oncology situations, however articles specific for oncology practice are scarce; this is a topic that oncologists must take up.

摘要

肿瘤患者的管理,尤其是住院患者的管理,几乎每天都会引发关于治疗局限性的讨论。在此,我们回顾相关历史,并对法国肿瘤学实践中构成“ withholding and withdrawing life - sustaining treatment”概念的文本进行总结。这一决定受2016年2月2日的《克莱伊斯 - 莱奥内蒂法》监管,该法建议进行合议讨论并将其记录在病历中。停止或撤销维持生命治疗的决定是患者、其医生和家属之间讨论的主题,并且可能在其治疗过程中的任何时候做出。重症监护医生的工作为急性肿瘤情况提供了许多有用的建议,然而针对肿瘤学实践的具体文章却很少;这是肿瘤学家必须关注的一个话题。

相似文献

1
[Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in acute oncology situations: History and regulatory aspects in France].[法国急性肿瘤学情况下维持生命治疗的 withhold 或撤除:历史与监管方面] (注:“withhold”此处可能是指“ withhold treatment”即“ withhold 治疗”,翻译时需结合医学语境准确理解,这里直接保留英文是因为不确定具体合适的中文表述,仅按要求翻译原文)
Bull Cancer. 2021 Apr;108(4):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.11.020. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
End-of-life care in the French ICU: Impact of Claeys-Leonetti law on decision to withhold or withdraw life-supportive therapy.法国重症监护病房的临终关怀:《克莱伊斯 - 莱奥内蒂法》对放弃或撤除生命支持治疗决策的影响。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Dec;38(6):569-570. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2019.10.013.
3
End-of-life care in the French ICU: Impact of Claeys-Leonetti law on decision to withhold or withdraw life-supportive therapy.法国重症监护病房的临终关怀:克莱伊斯 - 莱奥内蒂法对放弃或撤销生命维持治疗决策的影响。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Feb;39(1):113-114. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
[The decision to withhold and withdraw active treatments, an ethical approach].[关于停止和撤销积极治疗的决定:一种伦理方法]
Soins. 2015 Dec(801):49-51. doi: 10.1016/j.soin.2015.10.009.
5
Consequences of brain damage in the public debate regarding the end of life. The mediatic prism: a reflection of reality?关于生命终结的公开辩论中脑损伤的后果。媒体视角:是现实的反映吗?
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014 Feb;33(2):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
6
[Palliative care after neonatal intensive care: Contributions of Leonetti Law and remaining challenges].[新生儿重症监护后的姑息治疗:莱奥内蒂法则的贡献及尚存挑战]
Arch Pediatr. 2017 Feb;24(2):155-159. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
Palliative care and other physicians' knowledge, attitudes and practice relating to the law on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Survey results.姑息治疗及其他医生关于维持生命治疗的撤销/停止相关法律的知识、态度和实践:调查结果
Palliat Med. 2016 Feb;30(2):171-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216315587996. Epub 2015 May 22.
8
Comparing doctors' legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?比较澳大利亚三个州的医生在决定是否 withholding 或 withdrawing 维持生命的医疗treatment 时的法律合规性:不同的法律是否会导致不同的决策?
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Nov 28;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0249-1.
9
Opinions about the new law on end-of-life issues in a sample of french patients receiving palliative care.法国接受姑息治疗患者样本对临终问题新法律的看法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jan 21;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0174-8.
10
[Withholding and withdrawal decisions in oncology: legal frame and practice].[肿瘤学中的放弃和撤销治疗决策:法律框架与实践]
Bull Cancer. 2009 Jul-Aug;96(7):777-84. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2009.0910.