Donohue Brad, Gavrilova Elena, Danlag Alexandra, Perry Joanne, Kuhn Corey, Allen Daniel, Benning Stephen D
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Orthopedic Service Line, Novant Health, Charlotte, NC USA.
Psychol Sch. 2021 Mar;58(3):458-474. doi: 10.1002/pits.22458. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
Although collegiate athletes underutilize mental health programming, investigators have rarely examined factors that may influence their participation in such programs. The current study examined how structured interviews and demographic factors influence collegiate athletes to use psychological programming. Two-hundred and eighty-nine collegiate athletes were referred to the study. They were screened for mental health and randomly assigned to one of two semi-structured interviews based on experimental phase. Participants in Phase I received standard engagement (SE; N = 35) or SE+discussion of mental health (DMH; N = 44). Phase II participants received SE+DMH (N = 82) or SE+DMH + discussion of personal ambitions (DPA; N = 66). Phase III participants received SE+DMH+discussion about their culture of choice (DCC) (N = 25) or SE+DMH+discussion of sport culture (DSC) (N = 37). After receiving the respective interview participants were offered psychological assessment and intervention. Chi squared analyses revealed class standing, mental health symptom severity, referral type, and type of engagement interview influenced program commitment/utilization. Logistic regression analyses indicated SE+DMH+DPA and SE+DMH+DSC uniquely improved assessment attendance whereas referrals from the athletic department and coaches/teammates, participation in sport performance workshops, and senior status uniquely improved assessment and intervention attendance.
尽管大学生运动员很少利用心理健康项目,但研究人员很少研究可能影响他们参与此类项目的因素。当前的研究考察了结构化访谈和人口统计学因素如何影响大学生运动员使用心理项目。289名大学生运动员被纳入该研究。他们接受了心理健康筛查,并根据实验阶段被随机分配到两种半结构化访谈之一。第一阶段的参与者接受标准参与方式(SE;N = 35)或标准参与方式+心理健康讨论(DMH;N = 44)。第二阶段的参与者接受标准参与方式+心理健康讨论(N = 82)或标准参与方式+心理健康讨论+个人抱负讨论(DPA;N = 66)。第三阶段的参与者接受标准参与方式+心理健康讨论+关于他们所选文化的讨论(DCC)(N = 25)或标准参与方式+心理健康讨论+体育文化讨论(DSC)(N = 37)。在接受相应访谈后,为参与者提供了心理评估和干预。卡方分析显示年级排名、心理健康症状严重程度、转介类型和参与访谈的类型会影响项目承诺/利用率。逻辑回归分析表明,标准参与方式+心理健康讨论+个人抱负讨论和标准参与方式+心理健康讨论+体育文化讨论能独特地提高评估参与率,而来自体育部门和教练/队友的转介、参与运动表现工作坊以及高年级身份能独特地提高评估和干预参与率。