Suppr超能文献

2015年2月至4月,利用在线调查收集食物暴露信息,即食物手册子研究。

The use of an online survey for collecting food exposure information, Foodbook sub-study, February to April 2015.

作者信息

Gardhouse Christine, Hurst Matt, Sivanantharajah Sujani, Ciampa Nadia

机构信息

Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON.

出版信息

Can Commun Dis Rep. 2021 Jan 29;47(1):23-29. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v47i01a05.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During foodborne illness outbreak investigations, comparing food exposure frequencies of cases to those of a control population can help identify suspect food sources. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) conducted an online survey between February and April 2015 to collect seven-day food exposures from a convenience sample. The study period overlapped with a national, population-based exposure survey being conducted via telephone using random digit dialling. A subset of the food exposure questions from the telephone-based survey was included in the online survey.

OBJECTIVE

The online survey study objectives were to: 1) describe the survey methodology, survey respondents and response behaviour; and 2) determine if the online methodology is an appropriate alternative to telephone surveys by comparing food exposures.

METHODS

The online survey link was distributed via email to employees and public health partners, and was promoted on the PHAC website and social media channels.

RESULTS

In total 2,100 surveys were completed. The majority of respondents were female, with high income and education, aged 30 to 39 years. The proportion reporting consuming the food items in the online survey was generally higher than those reported in the telephone survey, with a mean difference of 6.0% (95% CI: 4.2, 7.8).

CONCLUSION

In an outbreak investigation, the 6.0% bias could make it more difficult to detect a difference between the case and control food exposures. Nevertheless, given the speed of response and lower resource expenditure of online surveys as well as the willing, able and convenient sample, a bias of 6.0% is considered small enough to be acceptable for future surveys.

摘要

背景

在食源性疾病暴发调查中,比较病例与对照人群的食物暴露频率有助于确定可疑食物来源。加拿大公共卫生署(PHAC)于2015年2月至4月开展了一项在线调查,以从一个便利样本中收集七天的食物暴露信息。研究期间与一项通过随机数字拨号进行的全国性、基于人群的电话暴露调查重叠。基于电话调查的一部分食物暴露问题被纳入在线调查。

目的

在线调查的研究目的是:1)描述调查方法、调查对象及应答行为;2)通过比较食物暴露情况,确定在线调查方法是否是电话调查的合适替代方法。

方法

在线调查链接通过电子邮件分发给员工和公共卫生合作伙伴,并在PHAC网站和社交媒体渠道上进行推广。

结果

共完成2100份调查问卷。大多数受访者为女性,收入和教育水平较高,年龄在30至39岁之间。在线调查中报告食用这些食物的比例普遍高于电话调查中的比例,平均差异为6.0%(95%可信区间:4.2,7.8)。

结论

在暴发调查中,6.0%的偏差可能会使检测病例与对照食物暴露之间的差异更加困难。然而,鉴于在线调查的应答速度快、资源消耗低以及样本的自愿性、可行性和便利性,6.0%的偏差被认为足够小,对于未来的调查来说是可以接受的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Ten years of Foodbook: Utilization of Foodbook survey data for research.《食物手册》十年:利用《食物手册》调查数据进行研究
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2025 Jul 1;51(6-7):283-291. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v51i67a06. eCollection 2025 Jul.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验