MacNaul Hannah, Garcia Rachel, Cividini-Motta Catia, Thacker Ian
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78207 USA.
Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Feb 26;14(4):1074-1078. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00566-8. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Choice of assignment has been shown to increase student engagement, improve academic outcomes, and promote student satisfaction in higher education courses (Hanewicz, Platt, & Arendt, , (3), 273-287, 2017). However, in previous research, choice resulted in complex procedures and increased response effort for instructors (e.g., Arendt, Trego, & Allred, , (1), 2-17, 2016). Using simplified procedures, the current study employed a repeated-measures with an alternating-treatments design to evaluate the effects of assignment choice (flash cards, study guide) on the academic outcomes of 42 graduate students in an online, asynchronous course. Slight differences between conditions were observed, but differences were not statistically significant.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-021-00566-8.
在高等教育课程中,已证明作业选择可提高学生参与度、改善学业成绩并提升学生满意度(哈内维茨、普拉特和阿伦特,(3),第273 - 287页,2017年)。然而,在先前的研究中,作业选择给教师带来了复杂的程序并增加了他们的应对工作量(例如,阿伦特、特雷戈和奥尔雷德,(1),第2 - 17页,2016年)。本研究采用简化程序,运用重复测量和交替处理设计,以评估作业选择(抽认卡、学习指南)对42名研究生在在线异步课程中学业成绩的影响。各条件之间观察到细微差异,但差异无统计学意义。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40617 - 021 - 00566 - 8获取的补充材料。