Possebon Anna Paula da Rosa, Schuster Alessandra Julie, Marcello-Machado Raissa Micaella, Martins Ana Paula Pinto, Pinto Luciana de Rezende, Chagas-Júnior Otacílio Luiz, Del Bel Cury Altair Antoninha, Faot Fernanda
Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Front Nutr. 2021 Feb 12;8:608095. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.608095. eCollection 2021.
Facial types may interfere in the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and masticatory performance of implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IMO) wearers. Investigate the medium-term changes in the masticatory function (MF) and OHRQoL parameters of IMO users, as a function of facial pattern, anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy, and sex. Forty IMO users, most of them Caucasian (90%) with average age of 69.17 years were classified according to their facial pattern and antero-posterior discrepancy prior to rehabilitation. MF was evaluated by the multiple sieves method to determine the average particle size (X50), heterogeneity (B) and masticatory efficiency (ME, calculated as the percentage of material retained in the 5.6 and 2.8 mm sieves), using Masticatory performance (MP) and swallowing threshold (ST) tests. OHRQoL was measured by applying the dental impact on daily life (DIDL) questionnaire. The data were analyzed by Wilcoxon-paired tests to analyze changes in MF parameters over time, and mixed-effect multilevel regression models were employed to verify differences between groups. Significant changes were still observed in the 3rd year for the ST test with improvements in B for Mesofacial and in time for Dolichofacial individuals, while ME_2.8 deteriorated for Brachyfacial participants. B values of Class I and male individuals improved and brachyfacial individuals still presented worse homogenization (B) than Mesofacial participants in both masticatory tests. Class II and III participants still showed improvements in ME_5.6 and time compared to Class I despite increases in X50. Class II individuals needed less cycles than Class I in the 3rd year. Brachyfacial participants scored lower in the Appearance domain than Mesofacial ones in the 3rd year. Dolichofacial participants and Class III patients scored lower in the Oral Comfort domain than Mesofacial and Class I, respectively. In addition, age influenced the Pain, Oral Comfort and General Performance domains in the 3rd year. Differences in facial morphology continue to influence the MF and OHRQoL outcomes in the 3rd year, and age influenced some OHRQoL domains. Brachyfacial individuals continue to benefit least from rehabilitation with IMO according to masticatory parameters.
面部类型可能会影响种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿(IMO)佩戴者的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)和咀嚼性能。研究IMO使用者咀嚼功能(MF)和OHRQoL参数的中期变化,作为面部形态、前后骨骼差异和性别的函数。40名IMO使用者,大多数为白种人(90%),平均年龄69.17岁,在修复前根据其面部形态和前后差异进行分类。通过多筛法评估MF,以确定平均粒径(X50)、异质性(B)和咀嚼效率(ME,计算为保留在5.6和2.8毫米筛子中的材料百分比),使用咀嚼性能(MP)和吞咽阈值(ST)测试。通过应用牙科对日常生活的影响(DIDL)问卷来测量OHRQoL。通过Wilcoxon配对检验分析数据,以分析MF参数随时间的变化,并采用混合效应多级回归模型来验证组间差异。在第3年,ST测试仍观察到显著变化,中面部个体的B值有所改善,长面部个体的时间有所改善,而短面部参与者的ME_2.8恶化。在两项咀嚼测试中,I类和男性个体的B值有所改善,短面部个体的均质化(B)仍比中面部参与者差。尽管X50增加,但II类和III类参与者的ME_5.6和时间仍比I类有所改善。在第3年,II类个体比I类个体需要更少的循环次数。在第3年,短面部参与者在外观领域的得分低于中面部参与者。长面部参与者和III类患者在口腔舒适度领域的得分分别低于中面部和I类。此外,年龄在第3年影响疼痛、口腔舒适度和总体性能领域。面部形态差异在第3年继续影响MF和OHRQoL结果,年龄影响一些OHRQoL领域。根据咀嚼参数,短面部个体从IMO修复中获益最少。