• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[重症与急诊医疗中的有限资源分配]

[Allocation of limited resources in intensive and emergency medical care].

作者信息

Dutzmann J, Nuding S

机构信息

Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.

出版信息

Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021 Apr;116(3):190-197. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00798-0. Epub 2021 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00063-021-00798-0
PMID:33682018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7937429/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Demographic change, medical progress, pandemics, and mass casualty events may cause an increased demand for intensive and emergency medical care resources. There is thus a definite need for fair allocation criteria.

OBJECTIVE

The rationale, structure, and criteria for allocation of intensive and emergency medical care resources are presented and discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis and discussion of German literature about the topic.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Decisions on the allocation of intensive and emergency medical care resources are made on different levels (micro-, meso-, and macrolevel). They shall fulfill minimum demands in terms of procedure and content. Consequent and careful examination of indication and evidence of therapeutic decisions as well as consequent and careful examination of the patient's definite or presumed consent helps to take responsibility for fair allocation decisions.

摘要

背景

人口结构变化、医学进步、大流行病和大规模伤亡事件可能导致对重症和急诊医疗资源的需求增加。因此,明确需要公平的分配标准。

目的

介绍并讨论重症和急诊医疗资源分配的基本原理、结构和标准。

材料与方法

对德国有关该主题的文献进行分析和讨论。

结果与结论

重症和急诊医疗资源分配的决策在不同层面(微观、中观和宏观层面)进行。这些决策应在程序和内容方面满足最低要求。对治疗决策的适应症和证据进行连贯且仔细的审查,以及对患者明确或推定的同意进行连贯且仔细的审查,有助于为公平分配决策负责。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8980/7937429/c303f308f75a/63_2021_798_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8980/7937429/c303f308f75a/63_2021_798_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8980/7937429/c303f308f75a/63_2021_798_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Allocation of limited resources in intensive and emergency medical care].[重症与急诊医疗中的有限资源分配]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021 Apr;116(3):190-197. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00798-0. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
2
[Ethical guides, criteria for admission in intensive care, palliative care. Multi-society recommendations for allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic].[伦理指南、重症监护与姑息治疗的收治标准。多学会关于新冠疫情期间资源分配的建议]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80 Suppl 3:45-64.
3
A catalogue of tools and variables from crisis and routine care to support decision-making about allocation of intensive care beds and ventilator treatment during pandemics: Scoping review.大流行期间支持重症监护床位和呼吸机治疗分配决策的危机和常规护理工具和变量目录:范围综述。
J Crit Care. 2021 Dec;66:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
4
Treating patients across European Union borders: An international survey in light of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic.跨越欧盟边界治疗患者:新冠肺炎大流行背景下的国际调查。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):344-347. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001423.
5
Prioritising 'already-scarce' intensive care unit resources in the midst of COVID-19: a call for regional triage committees in South Africa.在新冠疫情期间优先分配“本就稀缺的”重症监护病房资源:呼吁南非成立地区分诊委员会。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00596-5.
6
The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Statement on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri).南非重症监护协会关于 ICU 分诊和配给的共识声明(ConICTri)。
S Afr Med J. 2019 Aug 22;109(8b):613-629. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i8b.13947.
7
Translating theories of justice into a practice model for triage of scarce intensive care resources during a pandemic.将正义理论转化为大流行期间稀缺重症监护资源分类的实践模型。
Bioethics. 2024 Mar;38(3):223-232. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13198. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
8
Ethical prioritization of critical care resources during COVID-19: perspectives from Italy and the United States.新冠疫情期间危重病资源的伦理优先排序:来自意大利和美国的观点。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2024 Jun;45(3):167-181. doi: 10.1007/s11017-024-09672-4. Epub 2024 May 28.
9
Principled decisions and virtuous care: an ethical assessment of the SIAARTI Guidelines for allocating intensive care resources.有原则的决策和高尚的关怀:对 SIAARTI 重症监护资源分配指南的伦理评估。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Aug;86(8):872-876. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14691-1. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
Allocation of intensive care resources during an infectious disease outbreak: a rapid review to inform practice.传染病大流行期间的重症监护资源配置:一项快速综述以指导实践。
BMC Med. 2020 Dec 18;18(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01871-9.

引用本文的文献

1
[Current ethical aspects in intensive care medicine].[重症监护医学当前的伦理问题]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021 Apr;116(3):187-189. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00804-5. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
[Decisions on the allocation of intensive care resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic : Clinical and ethical recommendations of DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGIIN, DGNI, DGP, DGP and AEM. German version].[2019冠状病毒病大流行背景下重症监护资源分配的决策:德国重症监护与急诊医学跨学科协会、德国麻醉与重症监护医学协会、德国重症监护与内科急诊医学协会、德国神经重症监护与急诊医学协会、德国重症监护与肾脏病学协会、德国重症监护与胸外科学会、德国重症监护与儿科协会以及德国急诊医学协会的临床与伦理建议。德文版]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Sep;115(6):477-485. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00708-w.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Medizinrecht. 2020;38(6):466-471. doi: 10.1007/s00350-020-5563-6. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
Clinical ethics recommendations for the allocation of intensive care treatments in exceptional, resource-limited circumstances: the Italian perspective during the COVID-19 epidemic.
特殊资源受限情况下重症监护治疗分配的临床伦理建议:意大利在新冠疫情期间的视角
Crit Care. 2020 Apr 22;24(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02891-w.
4
[Position paper for a reform of medical emergency care in German emergency departments].[德国急诊科医疗急救护理改革立场文件]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2015 Jun;110(5):364-75. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0050-y.
5
[Therapy goal modification and therapy limit in intensive care medicine].[重症医学中的治疗目标调整与治疗限度]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2013 Feb;108(1):47-52. doi: 10.1007/s00063-012-0190-2.
6
[Extent and impact of bedside rationing in German hospitals: results of a representative survey among physicians].[德国医院床边资源分配的程度及影响:医生代表性调查结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Jun;134(24):1261-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1225273. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
7
[Health and justice].[健康与司法]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008 Aug;51(8):887-94. doi: 10.1007/s00103-008-0610-x.
8
How physicians allocate scarce resources at the bedside: a systematic review of qualitative studies.医生如何在床边分配稀缺资源:定性研究的系统综述
J Med Philos. 2008 Feb;33(1):80-99. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhm007.
9
Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.伦理咨询对重症监护环境中无意义生命维持治疗的影响:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1166-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.9.1166.
10
Justice and managed care. Four principles for the just allocation of health care resources.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 May-Jun;30(3):8-16.