Patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of zirconia bar compared to cobalt chromium bar retaining mandibular implant overdenture: A crossover study.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this crossover clinical study was the evaluation and comparison of patient satisfaction and masticatory performance for patients rehabilitated with mandibular two implant overdentures retained with two different bar attachments: zirconia bar and cobalt chromium bar.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty completely edentulous patients were divided into two equal groups: Group I (ZrO2), each patient received mandibular implant overdenture retained with CAD/CAM zirconia bar on two implants in the canine region, and Group II (Co-Cr), each patient received mandibular overdenture retained with conventional casted cobalt chromium metal bar. Patient satisfaction was measured with a survey questionnaire (PSQ-18), and masticatory performance was also evaluated with the two-colour mixing ability test after 3 months of overdenture insertion; then, each patient received a bar attachment from the other type and evaluations were repeated.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed regarding psychological acceptance (appearance), time, hygiene, undergo procedures, recommend procedures and the overall experience. In contrast, insignificant difference was observed regarding speech, chewing capacity, restorative procedures, complications and information prior to treatment. No significant difference was reported when comparing chewing performance between the two types of bar attachment.

CONCLUSION

Within this clinical study limitations, patient satisfaction with zirconia bar was higher than Co-Cr bar in terms of appearance, time, hygiene, undergo procedures, recommend procedures and the overall experience. Zirconia can become a suitable alternative to cobalt chromium alloys as a bar attachment. Combining the advantages of implant supported overdenture, CAD/CAM zirconia bar as an attachment, a satisfactory non-metal prosthesis could be provided.