Clessens A, Partoune A, Garcet S, Boxho P
Faculté de Droit, Sciences politiques et Criminologie, ULiège, Belgique.
Institut Médico-Légal, Liège, Belgique.
Rev Med Liege. 2021 Mar;76(3):173-178.
The aim of this study was to analyse retrospectively the profile of female victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) within the population of victims of assault and battery seen in expertise at the Forensic Institute of Liège. Overall, 678 files were analysed. The proportion, nature and type of IPV were determined, as well as the profile of the victims. The link between the socio-economic profile and the seriousness of the sequelae was analysed on the basis of the Chi-square test. 8,4 % of the files concerned IPV, of which 93,0 % were female victims. All the victims had suffered physical domestic violence and 55,5 % of the victims cumulated at least two forms of violence. According to Johnson's typology, 56,6 % of IPV cases may be considered as «Situational Couple Violence» and 43,4 % as «Intimate Terrorism». There are differences between the profile of victims of IPV according to the literature and the profile of victims seen at the IML. Subject to these differences, we have not found a link between the socio-economic status and the severity of the sequelae of IPV victims.
本研究的目的是对列日法医研究所鉴定所见的袭击和殴打受害者群体中亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）女性受害者的情况进行回顾性分析。总共分析了678份档案。确定了IPV的比例、性质和类型，以及受害者的情况。基于卡方检验分析了社会经济状况与后遗症严重程度之间的联系。8.4%的档案涉及IPV，其中93.0%为女性受害者。所有受害者都遭受过家庭身体暴力，55.5%的受害者至少遭受过两种形式的暴力。根据约翰逊的类型学，56.6%的IPV案件可被视为“情境性伴侣暴力”，43.4%可被视为“亲密恐怖主义”。IPV受害者的情况与文献中所述的情况以及在列日大学医学院（IML）所见的受害者情况存在差异。尽管存在这些差异，但我们并未发现IPV受害者的社会经济地位与后遗症严重程度之间存在联系。
