Department of Cardiology Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Affiliated Hangzhou Chest Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Zhejiang China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e019184. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019184. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
Background Long-term antithrombotic strategies for patients with chronic coronary syndrome with high-risk factors represent an important treatment dilemma in clinical practice. Our aim was to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Methods and Results Four randomized studies were included (n=75167; THEMIS [Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study], COMPASS [Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies], PEGASUS-TIMI 54 [Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54], and DAPT [Dual Anti-platelet Therapy]). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs) were calculated as the measure of effect size. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that, compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were 0.86; (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-1.02) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60,-0.86) for thienopyridine plus aspirin. Compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial-defined major bleeding were 2.15 (95% CI, 1.78-2.59]) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23-1.85) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.37-2.05) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin. For death from any cause, the improvement effect of rivaroxaban plus aspirin was detected versus aspirin monotherapy (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90), ticagrelor plus aspirin (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95), rivaroxaban monotherapy (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97), and thienopyridine plus aspirin (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82) regimens. Conclusions All antithrombotic strategies combined with aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and increased the risk of major bleeding compared with aspirin monotherapy. Considering the outcomes of all ischemic and bleeding events and all-cause mortality, rivaroxaban plus aspirin appears to be the preferred long-term antithrombotic regimen for patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high-risk factors.
对于伴有高危因素的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者,长期抗血栓治疗策略代表了临床实践中的一个重要治疗难题。我们旨在进行网状荟萃分析,以评估慢性冠状动脉综合征患者长期抗血栓治疗策略的疗效和安全性。
纳入了 4 项随机研究(n=75167; THEMIS [替格瑞洛在糖尿病患者中的健康结局干预研究]、COMPASS [抗凝策略在使用抗凝剂的患者中的心血管结局]、PEGASUS-TIMI 54 [与安慰剂相比,在阿司匹林溶栓治疗心肌梗死 54 例中使用替格瑞洛预防先前心脏病发作患者的心血管事件]和 DAPT [双重抗血小板治疗])。计算比值比(ORs)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)作为效应量的度量。网状荟萃分析的结果表明,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,试验定义的主要不良心血管和脑血管事件的 OR 为 0.86;(95%CI,0.80-0.93)替格瑞洛加阿司匹林、0.89(95%CI,0.78-1.02)瑞伐沙班单药治疗、0.74(95%CI,0.64-0.85)瑞伐沙班加阿司匹林和 0.72(95%CI,0.60-0.86)噻吩吡啶加阿司匹林。与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,试验定义的大出血的 OR 为 2.15(95%CI,1.78-2.59)替格瑞洛加阿司匹林、1.51(95%CI,1.23-1.85)瑞伐沙班单药治疗和 1.68(95%CI,1.37-2.05)瑞伐沙班加阿司匹林。对于任何原因导致的死亡,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,检测到 rivaroxaban 加阿司匹林(OR,0.76;95%CI,0.65-0.90)、ticagrelor 加阿司匹林(OR,0.79;95%CI,0.66-0.95)、rivaroxaban 单药治疗(OR,0.82;95%CI,0.69-0.97)和噻吩吡啶加阿司匹林(OR,0.58;95%CI,0.41-0.82)方案具有改善效果。
与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,所有联合阿司匹林的抗血栓治疗策略均显著降低了主要不良心血管和脑血管事件的发生率,并增加了大出血的风险。考虑到所有缺血和出血事件以及全因死亡率的结果,rivaroxaban 加阿司匹林似乎是伴有高危因素的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的首选长期抗血栓形成方案。