• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期抗血栓策略在慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou Zhejiang China.

Affiliated Hangzhou Chest Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Zhejiang China.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e019184. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019184. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.019184
PMID:33682435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8174196/
Abstract

Background Long-term antithrombotic strategies for patients with chronic coronary syndrome with high-risk factors represent an important treatment dilemma in clinical practice. Our aim was to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Methods and Results Four randomized studies were included (n=75167; THEMIS [Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study], COMPASS [Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies], PEGASUS-TIMI 54 [Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54], and DAPT [Dual Anti-platelet Therapy]). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs) were calculated as the measure of effect size. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that, compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were 0.86; (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-1.02) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60,-0.86) for thienopyridine plus aspirin. Compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial-defined major bleeding were 2.15 (95% CI, 1.78-2.59]) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23-1.85) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.37-2.05) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin. For death from any cause, the improvement effect of rivaroxaban plus aspirin was detected versus aspirin monotherapy (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90), ticagrelor plus aspirin (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95), rivaroxaban monotherapy (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97), and thienopyridine plus aspirin (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82) regimens. Conclusions All antithrombotic strategies combined with aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and increased the risk of major bleeding compared with aspirin monotherapy. Considering the outcomes of all ischemic and bleeding events and all-cause mortality, rivaroxaban plus aspirin appears to be the preferred long-term antithrombotic regimen for patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high-risk factors.

摘要

背景

对于伴有高危因素的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者,长期抗血栓治疗策略代表了临床实践中的一个重要治疗难题。我们旨在进行网状荟萃分析,以评估慢性冠状动脉综合征患者长期抗血栓治疗策略的疗效和安全性。

方法和结果

纳入了 4 项随机研究(n=75167; THEMIS [替格瑞洛在糖尿病患者中的健康结局干预研究]、COMPASS [抗凝策略在使用抗凝剂的患者中的心血管结局]、PEGASUS-TIMI 54 [与安慰剂相比,在阿司匹林溶栓治疗心肌梗死 54 例中使用替格瑞洛预防先前心脏病发作患者的心血管事件]和 DAPT [双重抗血小板治疗])。计算比值比(ORs)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)作为效应量的度量。网状荟萃分析的结果表明,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,试验定义的主要不良心血管和脑血管事件的 OR 为 0.86;(95%CI,0.80-0.93)替格瑞洛加阿司匹林、0.89(95%CI,0.78-1.02)瑞伐沙班单药治疗、0.74(95%CI,0.64-0.85)瑞伐沙班加阿司匹林和 0.72(95%CI,0.60-0.86)噻吩吡啶加阿司匹林。与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,试验定义的大出血的 OR 为 2.15(95%CI,1.78-2.59)替格瑞洛加阿司匹林、1.51(95%CI,1.23-1.85)瑞伐沙班单药治疗和 1.68(95%CI,1.37-2.05)瑞伐沙班加阿司匹林。对于任何原因导致的死亡,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,检测到 rivaroxaban 加阿司匹林(OR,0.76;95%CI,0.65-0.90)、ticagrelor 加阿司匹林(OR,0.79;95%CI,0.66-0.95)、rivaroxaban 单药治疗(OR,0.82;95%CI,0.69-0.97)和噻吩吡啶加阿司匹林(OR,0.58;95%CI,0.41-0.82)方案具有改善效果。

结论

与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,所有联合阿司匹林的抗血栓治疗策略均显著降低了主要不良心血管和脑血管事件的发生率,并增加了大出血的风险。考虑到所有缺血和出血事件以及全因死亡率的结果,rivaroxaban 加阿司匹林似乎是伴有高危因素的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的首选长期抗血栓形成方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d2/8174196/d66023bbafb2/JAH3-10-e019184-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d2/8174196/4d73d97ea08c/JAH3-10-e019184-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d2/8174196/ac6d6d8fb287/JAH3-10-e019184-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d2/8174196/d66023bbafb2/JAH3-10-e019184-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d2/8174196/4d73d97ea08c/JAH3-10-e019184-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d2/8174196/ac6d6d8fb287/JAH3-10-e019184-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d2/8174196/d66023bbafb2/JAH3-10-e019184-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.长期抗血栓策略在慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e019184. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019184. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Prophylactic Efficacy and Safety of Antithrombotic Regimens in Patients with Stable Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (S-ASCVD): A Bayesian Network Meta-Regression Analysis.稳定型动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(S-ASCVD)患者抗栓治疗方案的预防疗效和安全性:贝叶斯网络荟萃回归分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 May;23(3):257-267. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00574-9. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Comparison of Different Chronic Maintenance Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.比较冠心病患者不同慢性维持性抗血栓策略的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 Aug 17;2023:5446271. doi: 10.1155/2023/5446271. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs in chronic coronary syndromes patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.比较不同抗血小板或抗凝药物在慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e36429. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036429.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs)在急性心肌梗死治疗中的应用:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 24;1(1):CD014678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014678.pub2.
8
Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants for hypertension.抗血小板药物和抗凝剂治疗高血压。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 28;7:CD003186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003186.pub4.
9
Dipyridamole for preventing stroke and other vascular events in patients with vascular disease.双嘧达莫用于预防血管疾病患者的中风及其他血管事件。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD001820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001820.
10
Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for preventing cardiovascular disease.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林与单用阿司匹林预防心血管疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD005158. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005158.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association of CHADS-P2A2RC Risk Score With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Taking P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After 3 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受3个月双重抗血小板治疗的患者,采用P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗3个月时CHADS-P2A2RC风险评分与临床结局的相关性
Korean Circ J. 2024 Apr;54(4):189-200. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0268.
2
Comparison efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs in chronic coronary syndromes patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.比较不同抗血小板或抗凝药物在慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e36429. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036429.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在 70 岁或以上非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较(POPular AGE):随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30325-1.
2
Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone in Patients With Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (COMPASS-PCI).利伐沙班联合阿司匹林与单独应用阿司匹林治疗经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(COMPASS-PCI)后的患者。
Circulation. 2020 Apr 7;141(14):1141-1151. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044598. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Revascularization and Medical Therapy for Chronic Coronary Syndromes: Lessons Learnt from Recent Trials, a Literature Review.
慢性冠状动脉综合征的血运重建与药物治疗:从近期试验中汲取的经验教训,一篇文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 12;12(8):2833. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082833.
4
Antithrombotic regimens for the prevention of major adverse cardiac events in chronic coronary syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.慢性冠状动脉综合征中预防主要不良心脏事件的抗栓治疗方案:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr 6;10:1040936. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1040936. eCollection 2023.
5
Prophylactic Efficacy and Safety of Antithrombotic Regimens in Patients with Stable Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (S-ASCVD): A Bayesian Network Meta-Regression Analysis.稳定型动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(S-ASCVD)患者抗栓治疗方案的预防疗效和安全性:贝叶斯网络荟萃回归分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 May;23(3):257-267. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00574-9. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
6
Secondary prevention of antithrombotic therapy in patients with stable cardiovascular disease at high ischemic risk: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.高缺血风险稳定心血管疾病患者抗血栓治疗的二级预防:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 9;9:1040473. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1040473. eCollection 2022.
7
Efficacy and safety outcomes of long-term anti-thrombotic treatment of chronic coronary artery disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.慢性冠状动脉疾病长期抗血栓治疗的疗效和安全性结果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 9;9:1016390. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1016390. eCollection 2022.
8
Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: progress toward personalized management.2 型糖尿病中的心血管疾病:迈向个体化管理的进展。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 May 14;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01516-6.
9
A fatal unsuspected case of acquired A hemophilia. Misleading role of therapy with acetylsalicylic acid?一例致命的未被怀疑的获得性A型血友病病例。阿司匹林治疗的误导作用?
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;16(8):2339-2340. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02760-6. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
Long-term ticagrelor for secondary prevention in patients with prior myocardial infarction and no history of coronary stenting: insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54.
长期使用替格瑞洛对既往有心肌梗死且无冠状动脉支架置入史患者进行二级预防:来自PEGASUS-TIMI 54研究的见解
Eur Heart J. 2020 May 1;41(17):1625-1632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz821.
4
Effects of the Antianginal Drugs Ranolazine, Nicorandil, and Ivabradine on Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.抗心绞痛药物雷诺嗪、尼可地尔和伊伐布雷定对非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉微血管功能的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Ther. 2019 Oct;41(10):2137-2152.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
5
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
6
Ticagrelor in patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease with a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (THEMIS-PCI): a phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.替格瑞洛在既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗史的糖尿病合并稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用(THEMIS-PCI):一项 3 期、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1169-1180. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31887-2. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
7
Ticagrelor in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease and Diabetes.替格瑞洛在稳定型冠心病合并糖尿病患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 3;381(14):1309-1320. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908077. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
8
Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel Monotherapy for the Treatment of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿司匹林单药治疗与氯吡格雷单药治疗稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2062-2071. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01004-6. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
9
Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗 1 个月,随后替格瑞洛单药治疗 23 个月,与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛治疗 12 个月,随后药物洗脱支架植入后阿司匹林单药治疗 12 个月:一项多中心、开放标签、随机优效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):940-949. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31858-0. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
10
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and prior coronary artery disease: Insights from the EUCLID trial.替卡格雷与氯吡格雷在有症状外周动脉疾病和既往冠状动脉疾病患者中的比较:来自 EUCLID 试验的结果。
Vasc Med. 2018 Dec;23(6):523-530. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18775594. Epub 2018 Jul 11.