Biomedical Engineering, Konkuk University, Choongju, Korea.
Biomechanics and Sport Engineering Laboratory, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea.
Technol Health Care. 2021;29(S1):433-440. doi: 10.3233/THC-218041.
Joint loads in different walking strategies during stair descent have been investigated in terms of the joint moment in association with the risk of osteoarthritis. However, the absorption mechanisms of the potential energy loss are not known.
This study aims to compare the mechanical energy absorptions in lower limb joints in different initial foot contact strategies.
Nineteen young subjects walked down on instrumented stairs with two different strategies, i.e., forefoot and rearfoot strike. Power and energy at lower limb joints during stance phase were compared between strategies.
Lower limb joints absorbed 73 ± 11% of the potential energy released by descending stairs and there was no difference between strategies. Rearfoot strategy absorbed less energy than forefoot strategy at the ankle joint in the 1st phase, which was compensated mainly by more energy absorption at the knee in the 2nd phase and less energy generation at the hip joints in the 3rd phase.
The results suggest that a leg absorbs most of the potential energy while descending stairs irrespective of the walking strategies and that any reduction of energy absorption at one joint is compensated by other joints. Greater energy absorption at the knee joint compared to the other joints suggests high burden of knee joint muscles and connective tissues during stair-descent, which is even more significant for the rearfoot strike strategy.
在楼梯下降过程中,不同行走策略下的关节负荷与骨关节炎风险相关的关节力矩有关。然而,潜在能量损失的吸收机制尚不清楚。
本研究旨在比较不同初始足触地策略下下肢关节的机械能吸收。
19 名年轻受试者分别以足前掌和足后跟着地两种策略在带仪器的楼梯上行走。比较两种策略下站立阶段下肢关节的功率和能量。
下肢关节吸收了下楼释放的势能的 73±11%,两种策略之间没有差异。后足策略在第一阶段吸收的能量比前足策略在踝关节少,这主要通过第二阶段在膝关节吸收更多的能量和在髋关节产生更少的能量来补偿。
结果表明,无论行走策略如何,腿部在下降楼梯时吸收了大部分势能,并且一个关节的能量吸收减少会被其他关节补偿。与其他关节相比,膝关节的能量吸收更大,这表明在楼梯下降过程中膝关节肌肉和结缔组织的负担较高,对于后足着地策略更为明显。