• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于团队的医疗保健中通过电子健康记录进行信息共享:患者视角。

Information sharing via electronic health records in team-based care: the patient perspective.

机构信息

University of Utah, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Division of Family Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.

University of Utah, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Salt Lake City, USA.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):468-472. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa145.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmaa145
PMID:33684209
Abstract

PURPOSE

Team-based care offers potential improvements in communication, care coordination, efficiency, value and satisfaction levels of both patients and providers. However, the question of how to balance the need for information in team-based care without disregarding patient preferences remains unanswered. This study aims to determine patients' perceptions of information sharing via electronic health records (EHRs) in team-based care.

METHODS

This qualitative study used a focus group approach. Participants were primary care patients and representative members from minority groups (ethnic, racial or social). Audio recordings of the sessions were transcribed and coded consistent with thematic analyses.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that the participants in the focus groups had diverging levels of understanding and personal beliefs around five major themes including (i) patient's understanding of the care team, (ii) perceptions of electronic health records, (iii) defining basic health care information, (iv) sharing information with the health care team and (v) patient's trust in doctors and the health care system.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants of our focus groups value team-based care and view patients as a critical part of those teams. With respect to electronic health records, our participants recognized their importance but had concerns about inaccuracies and limited options to correct errors in their records. In general, participants were willing to share basic information but disagreed about what information should be considered to be basic. Moreover, based on their trust and comfort level, many participants want to control what information is recorded and shared in the electronic health record.

摘要

目的

团队式护理在改善医患双方的沟通、护理协调、效率、价值和满意度方面具有潜在优势。然而,如何在不忽视患者偏好的情况下平衡团队式护理中对信息的需求,这一问题仍未得到解答。本研究旨在确定患者对团队式护理中电子健康记录(EHRs)信息共享的看法。

方法

本定性研究采用了焦点小组的方法。参与者为初级保健患者和来自少数民族群体(族裔、种族或社会)的代表成员。会话的音频记录被转录并按照主题分析进行编码。

结果

分析显示,焦点小组的参与者在五个主要主题方面存在不同程度的理解和个人信念,包括:(i)患者对护理团队的理解;(ii)对电子健康记录的看法;(iii)基本医疗保健信息的定义;(iv)与医疗保健团队共享信息;(v)患者对医生和医疗保健系统的信任。

结论

我们的焦点小组参与者重视团队式护理,并将患者视为这些团队的重要组成部分。关于电子健康记录,我们的参与者认识到其重要性,但对记录中的不准确和纠正错误的选项有限表示担忧。总体而言,参与者愿意共享基本信息,但对于哪些信息应被视为基本信息存在分歧。此外,根据他们的信任和舒适度,许多参与者希望控制电子健康记录中记录和共享的信息。

相似文献

1
Information sharing via electronic health records in team-based care: the patient perspective.基于团队的医疗保健中通过电子健康记录进行信息共享:患者视角。
Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):468-472. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa145.
2
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
3
State of the art and a mixed-method personalized approach to assess patient perceptions on medical record sharing and sensitivity.评估患者对病历共享和敏感性看法的最新技术与混合方法个性化途径
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jan;101:103338. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103338. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Use of the Blue Button Online Tool for Sharing Health Information: Qualitative Interviews With Patients and Providers.使用蓝色按钮在线工具共享健康信息:对患者和医疗服务提供者的定性访谈。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 18;17(8):e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4595.
5
Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical notes through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: qualitative study.通过“我的健康卫士”个人健康记录试点项目让患者全面电子访问健康记录和临床笔记的体验:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 27;15(3):e65. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2356.
6
The impact of patient-generated contextual data on communication in clinical practice: A qualitative assessment of patient and clinician perspectives.患者生成的情境数据对临床实践中沟通的影响:基于患者和临床医生视角的定性评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):734-740. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Trust, confidentiality, and the acceptability of sharing HIV-related patient data: lessons learned from a mixed methods study about Health Information Exchanges.信任、保密性和共享 HIV 相关患者数据的可接受性:来自健康信息交换混合方法研究的经验教训。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 19;7:34. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-34.
8
"I want to know everything": a qualitative study of perspectives from patients with chronic diseases on sharing health information during hospitalization.“我想了解一切”:一项关于慢性病患者在住院期间分享健康信息观点的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 4;17(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2487-6.
9
Mapping communication spaces: The development and use of a tool for analyzing the impact of EHRs on interprofessional collaborative practice.映射沟通空间:一种用于分析电子健康记录对跨专业协作实践影响的工具的开发与应用
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Sep;93:2-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
The invisible work of personal health information management among people with multiple chronic conditions: qualitative interview study among patients and providers.患有多种慢性病患者的个人健康信息管理的无形工作:患者和医护人员的定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 4;17(6):e137. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4381.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding patient perception of digital value co-creation in electronic health record through clustering approach.通过聚类方法理解患者对电子健康记录中数字价值共创的认知。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91287-3.
2
Patient and caregiver perceptions of electronic health records interoperability in the NHS and its impact on care quality: a focus group study.患者及护理人员对英国国民医疗服务体系中电子健康记录互操作性的看法及其对护理质量的影响:一项焦点小组研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02789-5.
3
What Do We Mean by Sharing of Patient Data? DaSH: A Data Sharing Hierarchy of Privacy and Ethical Challenges.
我们所说的患者数据共享是什么意思?DaSH:数据共享的隐私和伦理挑战层次结构。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):833-841. doi: 10.1055/a-2373-3291. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Barriers and Opportunities for the Use of Digital Tools in Medicines Optimization Across the Interfaces of Care: Stakeholder Interviews in the United Kingdom.在医疗照护各界面使用数字工具进行药物优化的障碍与机遇:英国的利益相关者访谈
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Mar 10;11:e42458. doi: 10.2196/42458.