Department of Physical Therapy, Delaware Limb Loss Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Department of Physical Therapy, Delaware Limb Loss Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jul;102(7):1331-1339. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
The primary purpose of this study was to compare trunk muscle characteristics between adults with and without unilateral lower limb amputation (LLA) to determine the presence of modifiable trunk muscle deficits (ie, impaired activity, reduced volume, increased intramuscular fat) evaluated by ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We hypothesized that compared with adults without LLA (controls), individuals with transfemoral or transtibial LLA would demonstrate reduced multifidi activity, worse multifidi and erector spinae morphology, and greater side-to-side trunk muscle asymmetries.
Cross-sectional imaging study.
Research laboratory and imaging center.
Sedentary adults (n=38 total) with LLA (n=9 transfemoral level; n=14 transtibial level) and controls without LLA (n=15).
Not applicable.
We examined bilateral multifidi activity using US at levels L3/L4-L5/S1. MRI was performed using 3-dimensional quantitative fat-water imaging; bilateral L1-L5 multifidi and erector spinae were manually traced, and muscle volume (normalized to body weight) and percentage intramuscular fat were determined. Between-group and side-to-side differences were evaluated.
Compared with adults without LLA, participants with LLA demonstrated reduced sound-side multifidi activity; those with transfemoral LLA had larger amputated-side multifidi volume, whereas those with transtibial LLA had greater sound- and amputated-side erector spinae intramuscular fat (P<.050). With transfemoral LLA, side-to-side differences in erector spinae volume, as well as multifidi and erector spinae intramuscular fat, were found (P<.050).
Impaired trunk muscle activity and increased intramuscular fat may be modifiable targets for intervention after LLA.
本研究的主要目的是比较单侧下肢截肢(LLA)和无单侧下肢截肢(对照组)成年人的躯干肌肉特征,以确定通过超声(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)评估的可改变的躯干肌肉缺陷(即活动受限、体积减少、肌肉内脂肪增加)的存在。我们假设与无 LLA(对照组)的成年人相比,股骨或胫骨截肢的个体将表现出多裂肌活动减少、多裂肌和竖脊肌形态恶化以及躯干肌肉左右侧不对称增加。
横断面影像学研究。
研究实验室和成像中心。
久坐的成年人(共 38 人),包括 LLA(9 例股骨水平;14 例胫骨水平)和无 LLA 对照组(15 例)。
不适用。
我们使用 US 检查 L3/L4-L5/S1 水平的双侧多裂肌活动。使用 3 维定量脂肪水成像进行 MRI;手动追踪双侧 L1-L5 多裂肌和竖脊肌,并确定肌肉体积(标准化为体重)和肌肉内脂肪百分比。评估组间和左右侧差异。
与无 LLA 的成年人相比,LLA 患者的健侧多裂肌活动减少;股骨截肢的患者患侧多裂肌体积较大,而胫骨截肢的患者患侧和健侧竖脊肌内的肌肉脂肪较多(P<.050)。对于股骨截肢,发现竖脊肌体积以及多裂肌和竖脊肌内的肌肉脂肪左右侧差异(P<.050)。
在 LLA 后,受损的躯干肌肉活动和增加的肌肉内脂肪可能是干预的可改变目标。