School of Leisure Sport and Management, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
J Pain. 2021 Sep;22(9):1048-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
Caregiving and other interpersonal interactions often require accurate perception of others' pain from nonverbal cues, but perceivers may be subject to systematic biases based on gender, race, and other contextual factors. Such biases could contribute to systematic under-recognition and undertreatment of pain. In 2 experiments, we studied the impact of perceived patient sex on lay perceivers' pain estimates and treatment recommendations. In Experiment 1 (N = 50), perceivers viewed facial video clips of female and male patients in chronic shoulder pain and estimated patients' pain intensity. Multi-level linear modeling revealed that perceivers under-estimated female patients' pain compared with male patients, after controlling for patients' self-reported pain and pain facial expressiveness. Experiment 2 (N = 200) replicated these findings, and additionally found that 1) perceivers' pain-related gender stereotypes, specifically beliefs about typical women's vs. men's willingness to express pain, predicted pain estimation biases; and 2) perceivers judged female patients as relatively more likely to benefit from psychotherapy, whereas male patients were judged to benefit more from pain medicine. In both experiments, the gender bias effect size was on average 2.45 points on a 0-100 pain scale. Gender biases in pain estimation may be an obstacle to effective pain care, and experimental approaches to characterizing biases, such as the one we tested here, could inform the development of interventions to reduce such biases. Perspective: This study identifies a bias towards underestimation of pain in female patients, which is related to gender stereotypes. The findings suggest caregivers' or even clinicians' pain stereotypes are a potential target for intervention.
照料和其他人际互动通常需要从非言语线索中准确感知他人的疼痛,但感知者可能会受到性别、种族和其他背景因素的系统偏见的影响。这些偏见可能导致对疼痛的系统性低估和治疗不足。在两项实验中,我们研究了感知到的患者性别对非专业感知者的疼痛评估和治疗建议的影响。在实验 1(N=50)中,感知者观看了慢性肩部疼痛的女性和男性患者的面部视频剪辑,并估计了患者的疼痛强度。多层次线性建模显示,在控制了患者的自我报告疼痛和疼痛面部表达后,感知者低估了女性患者的疼痛,而不是男性患者。实验 2(N=200)复制了这些发现,并进一步发现:1)感知者与疼痛相关的性别刻板印象,特别是关于女性和男性表达疼痛的典型意愿的信念,预测了疼痛评估的偏见;2)感知者判断女性患者相对更有可能从心理治疗中受益,而男性患者则被判断更有可能从疼痛药物中受益。在这两个实验中,疼痛估计中的性别偏见效应大小平均为 0-100 疼痛量表上的 2.45 分。在疼痛评估中存在性别偏见可能是有效疼痛护理的障碍,而描述这种偏见的实验方法,如我们在这里测试的方法,可以为减少这种偏见的干预措施提供信息。观点:本研究确定了对女性患者疼痛的低估偏见,这与性别刻板印象有关。研究结果表明,护理人员甚至临床医生的疼痛刻板印象可能是干预的潜在目标。