• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年脑卒中患者治疗中CYP2C19基因多态性与氯吡格雷的相关性

Association with CYP2C19 polymorphisms and Clopidogrel in treatment of elderly stroke patients.

作者信息

Li Changqing, Jia Weihua, Li Jian, Li Fangfei, Ma Jing, Zhou Lichun

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurology, Shijingshan Teaching Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Shijingshan Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02127-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-021-02127-6
PMID:33685396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7941922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug used in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Safety and efficacy of clopidogrel has been confirmed in CAPRIE, PRoFESS trials. However, these studies focused on patients aged less than 75 years. CYP2C19 polymorphisms resulted in individual differences in clopidogrel response. Our objective was to determine whether elderly stroke patients aged over 75 years would benefit from CYP2C19-genotype-guided strategy for the secondary prevention of stroke.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients aged 75 years or older with non-cardiogenic stroke who received 75 mg clopidogrel was performed. CYP2C19 genotype-guided group included noncarriers of CYP2C192 or CYP2C193 loss-of-function alleles (LoFA) and compared against the non-genotype-guided group which may carriers CYP2C19 LoFA or not. The primary endpoints were composite of stroke and myocardial infarction at 24 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred one patients were included: 99 in the genotype-guided group and 102 in the non-genotype-guided group. Kaplan-Meier(KM)analysis showed that CYP2C19 gene polymorphism was associated with the rate of the primary endpoints (P = 0.0031). The primary endpoints occurred in 13 patients (13.1%) in the genotype-guided group and in 30 patients (29.4%) in the non-genotype-guided group (hazard ratio(HR), 0.39; 95% confidence interval(CI), 0.20 to 0.75; p = 0.004). Cox regression analysis showed that CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy was a protective factor for the primary endpoints (HR, 0.39; 95% CI:0.20 to 0.74, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy could reduce the occurrence of composite of stroke and myocardial infarction compared to a non-genotype-guided strategy for non-cardiogenic stroke patients aged 75 years or older who received clopidogrel.

摘要

背景

氯吡格雷是一种用于治疗缺血性卒中的抗血小板药物。氯吡格雷的安全性和有效性已在CAPRIE、PRoFESS试验中得到证实。然而,这些研究主要关注年龄小于75岁的患者。CYP2C19基因多态性导致氯吡格雷反应存在个体差异。我们的目的是确定75岁以上的老年卒中患者是否能从CYP2C19基因分型指导的卒中二级预防策略中获益。

方法

对年龄在75岁及以上、接受75mg氯吡格雷治疗的非心源性卒中患者进行回顾性分析。CYP2C19基因分型指导组包括CYP2C192或CYP2C193功能缺失等位基因(LoFA)的非携带者,并与可能携带或不携带CYP2C19 LoFA的非基因分型指导组进行比较。主要终点是随访24个月时卒中与心肌梗死的复合终点。

结果

共纳入201例患者:基因分型指导组99例,非基因分型指导组102例。Kaplan-Meier(KM)分析显示,CYP2C19基因多态性与主要终点发生率相关(P = 0.0031)。基因分型指导组有13例患者(13.1%)发生主要终点,非基因分型指导组有30例患者(29.4%)发生主要终点(风险比[HR],0.39;95%置信区间[CI],0.20至0.75;P = 0.004)。Cox回归分析显示,CYP2C19基因分型指导策略是主要终点的保护因素(HR,0.39;95%CI:0.20至0.74,P = 0.004)。

结论

对于接受氯吡格雷治疗的75岁及以上非心源性卒中患者,与非基因分型指导策略相比,CYP2C19基因分型指导策略可降低卒中和心肌梗死复合终点的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b6/7941922/443cb8b1a647/12883_2021_2127_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b6/7941922/6b0047a01e19/12883_2021_2127_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b6/7941922/443cb8b1a647/12883_2021_2127_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b6/7941922/6b0047a01e19/12883_2021_2127_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b6/7941922/443cb8b1a647/12883_2021_2127_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Association with CYP2C19 polymorphisms and Clopidogrel in treatment of elderly stroke patients.老年脑卒中患者治疗中CYP2C19基因多态性与氯吡格雷的相关性
BMC Neurol. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02127-6.
2
Efficacy of clopidogrel for stroke depends on CYP2C19 genotype and risk profile.氯吡格雷治疗中风的疗效取决于 CYP2C19 基因型和风险状况。
Ann Neurol. 2019 Sep;86(3):419-426. doi: 10.1002/ana.25535. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TAILOR-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial.基因指导的口服 P2Y12 抑制剂选择与常规氯吡格雷治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后缺血结局的影响:TAILOR-PCI 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):761-771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12443.
4
Association Between CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Allele Status and Efficacy of Clopidogrel for Risk Reduction Among Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.CYP2C19 失活等位基因状态与氯吡格雷降低小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者风险的疗效之间的关系。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):70-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8662.
5
Clopidogrel responder status is uninfluenced by CYP2C19*2 in Danish patients with stroke.氯吡格雷反应状态不受 CYP2C19*2 影响在丹麦中风患者中。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0236260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236260. eCollection 2020.
6
CYP2C19 polymorphisms and clopidogrel efficacy in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: a retrospective observational study.CYP2C19 多态性与氯吡格雷在缺血性脑卒中二级预防中的疗效:一项回顾性观察研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;10(12):12171-12180. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2905.
7
CYP2C19 and CES1 polymorphisms and efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.CYP2C19和CES1基因多态性与氯吡格雷和阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗对症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病患者的疗效
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1746-51. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15795. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
Clopidogrel in noncarriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles versus ticagrelor in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: A pre-specified sub analysis from the POPular Genetics and POPular Age trials CYP2C19 alleles in elderly patients.氯吡格雷在非 CYP2C19 失活等位基因携带者与替格瑞洛在老年急性冠脉综合征患者中的应用:POPular Genetics 和 POPular Age 试验中 CYP2C19 等位基因在老年患者亚组分析的预先指定
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;334:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.04.029. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
Efficacy of Clopidogrel for Prevention of Stroke Based on Allele Status in the POINT Trial.基于 POINT 试验中基因等位基因状态的氯吡格雷预防卒中的疗效。
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2058-2065. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028713. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism in prognosis of minor stroke or TIA patients with declined eGFR on dual antiplatelet therapy: CHANCE substudy.CYP2C19基因多态性对估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)降低的轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者双重抗血小板治疗预后的影响:CHANCE研究的亚组分析
Pharmacogenomics J. 2018 Dec;18(6):713-720. doi: 10.1038/s41397-018-0018-4. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genotypes and Clopidogrel in Patients With Ischemic Stroke: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.缺血性中风患者的细胞色素P450 2C19基因型与氯吡格雷:一项非随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e250398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0398.
2
Analysis of the effect of CYP2C19 gene properties on the anti-platelet aggregation of clopidogrel after carotid artery stenting under network pharmacology.基于网络药理学分析 CYP2C19 基因特性对颈动脉支架置入术后氯吡格雷抗血小板聚集的影响。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024 Jun 6;25(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40360-024-00750-w.
3
Role of Loci (rs28757157 and rs3751591) with Ischemic Stroke Risk in the Chinese Han Population.

本文引用的文献

1
A Genotype-Guided Strategy for Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Primary PCI.一种基于基因型的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中口服 P2Y12 抑制剂的策略。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1621-1631. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907096. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
Efficacy of clopidogrel for stroke depends on CYP2C19 genotype and risk profile.氯吡格雷治疗中风的疗效取决于 CYP2C19 基因型和风险状况。
Ann Neurol. 2019 Sep;86(3):419-426. doi: 10.1002/ana.25535. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics.氯吡格雷药物遗传学。
位点(rs28757157和rs3751591)在中国汉族人群中与缺血性中风风险的关系。
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2023 May 29;16:491-502. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S404160. eCollection 2023.
4
Prevalence of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 variants and the impact on clopidogrel efficacy in patients having CYPC19*2 variant.CYP2C9 和 CYP2C19 变异体的流行率以及 CYP2C19*2 变异体患者中对氯吡格雷疗效的影响。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2023 Jan-Feb;55(1):27-33. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_706_22.
5
Pharmacogenetics of Antiplatelet Therapy.抗血小板治疗的药物遗传学。
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Jan 20;63:211-229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-051921-092701. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007811. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007811.
4
Recurrent ischemic stroke: Incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality.复发性缺血性卒中:发生率、预测因素及其对死亡率的影响。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2019 Jul;140(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/ane.13093. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Clinical outcomes of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy: existing evidence and future directions.CYP2C19基因分型指导的抗血小板治疗的临床结局:现有证据与未来方向。
Pharmacogenomics. 2018 Aug 1;19(13):1039-1046. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2018-0072. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2018年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):e67-e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Effects of Triflusal and Clopidogrel on the Secondary Prevention of Stroke Based on Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genotyping.基于细胞色素P450 2C19基因分型探讨曲氟尿苷和氯吡格雷对卒中二级预防的作用
J Stroke. 2017 Sep;19(3):356-364. doi: 10.5853/jos.2017.01249. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
8
Genetic Polymorphisms and Clopidogrel Efficacy for Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传多态性与氯吡格雷对急性缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2017 Jan 3;135(1):21-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024913. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
9
Association Between CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Allele Status and Efficacy of Clopidogrel for Risk Reduction Among Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.CYP2C19 失活等位基因状态与氯吡格雷降低小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者风险的疗效之间的关系。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):70-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8662.
10
Influence of Genetic Polymorphisms on Clopidogrel Response and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke CYP2C19 Genotype on Clopidogrel Response.基因多态性对急性缺血性卒中患者氯吡格雷反应及临床结局的影响 CYP2C19 基因型对氯吡格雷反应的影响
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2015 Sep;21(9):692-7. doi: 10.1111/cns.12426. Epub 2015 Jul 15.