• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Addressing Common Challenges in the Implementation of Collaborative Care for Mental Health: The Penn Integrated Care Program.解决精神健康协作式照护实施中的常见挑战:宾夕法尼亚综合关怀计划。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):148-156. doi: 10.1370/afm.2651.
2
Evaluating Implementation and Outcomes of the Achieving Depression and Anxiety Patient-Centered Treatment Collaborative Care Program in a Large, Integrated Health Care System: A Mixed Methods Observational Study Protocol.评估在大型综合医疗保健系统中实施达成抑郁和焦虑患者为中心的治疗协作护理计划的情况和结果:一项混合方法观察性研究方案。
Perm J. 2022 Dec 19;26(4):39-48. doi: 10.7812/TPP/22.050. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Implementation outcomes of evidence-based quality improvement for depression in VA community based outpatient clinics.基于证据的抑郁症质量改进在退伍军人事务部社区门诊中的实施结果。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 11;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-30.
4
Implementation and adaptation of a hub-based psychiatric and primary care program: A qualitative descriptive analysis of The Seamless Care Optimizing the Patient Experience (SCOPE) Mental Health program.基于枢纽的精神科和初级保健项目的实施和调整:无缝护理优化患者体验(SCOPE)精神卫生项目的定性描述分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 28;19(5):e0303750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303750. eCollection 2024.
5
Multilevel perspectives on the implementation of the collaborative care model for depression and anxiety in primary care.多层面视角下的基层医疗中抑郁和焦虑的协同护理模式实施。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05930-w.
6
Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care: Consulting, Coordinating and Collaborating Among Professionals.整合行为健康与初级保健:专业人员之间的咨询、协调与协作。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S21-31. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150042.
7
Change in suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety following collaborative care in the community.社区协作式护理对自杀意念、抑郁和焦虑的影响变化。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 5;25(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02494-2.
8
Mixed methods evaluation of a collaborative care implementation using RE-AIM.使用RE-AIM对协作护理实施情况进行混合方法评估。
Fam Syst Health. 2017 Sep;35(3):295-307. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000291. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
9
Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.在整合行为健康与初级保健的实践中观察到的电子健康记录挑战、变通方法及解决方案
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.
10
Barriers to physical and mental condition integrated service delivery.身心状况综合服务提供的障碍。
Psychosom Med. 2010 Jul;72(6):511-8. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181e2c4a0. Epub 2010 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging primary care patients at risk for suicide in mental health treatment: user insights to inform implementation strategy design.使有自杀风险的初级保健患者参与精神卫生治疗:用户见解为实施策略设计提供信息。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 16;25(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02616-w.
2
Slipping Through the Cracks: Clinicians' Perspectives on the Gaps in New York City's Public Mental Health System.被忽视:临床医生对纽约市公共心理健康系统漏洞的看法
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jan;61(1):122-129. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01333-z. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
Social prescribing for suicide prevention: a rapid review.预防自杀的社会处方:快速综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 5;12:1396614. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1396614. eCollection 2024.
4
Change in suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety following collaborative care in the community.社区协作式护理对自杀意念、抑郁和焦虑的影响变化。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 5;25(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02494-2.
5
Safety planning intervention and follow-up: A telehealth service model for suicidal individuals in emergency department settings: Study design and protocol.安全规划干预与随访:急诊科自杀患者的远程医疗服务模式:研究设计与方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 May;140:107492. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107492. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
6
Core Components and Implementation Determinants of Multilevel Service Delivery Frameworks Across Child Mental Health Service Settings.多水平服务传递框架的核心组成部分和实施决定因素:跨越儿童心理健康服务环境。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Mar;51(2):172-195. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01320-8. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
7
Challenges and strategies for conducting research in primary health care practice: an integrative review.基层医疗实践中开展研究的挑战与策略:综合述评。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):1380. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10382-1.
8
Treating individuals with suicidal ideation in primary care: Patient-level characteristics associated with follow-up in the Collaborative Care Model.在初级保健中治疗有自杀意念的个体:与协作式护理模式中的随访相关的患者特征。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2024 Feb;54(1):15-23. doi: 10.1111/sltb.13012. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
9
Adapting psychotherapy in collaborative care for treating opioid use disorder and co-occurring psychiatric conditions in primary care.协作式护理中适应心理治疗以治疗初级保健中阿片类药物使用障碍和共病精神疾病。
Fam Syst Health. 2023 Sep;41(3):377-388. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000791. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
Leveraging behavioral economics and implementation science to engage patients at risk for suicide in mental health treatment: a pilot study protocol.利用行为经济学和实施科学促使有自杀风险的患者参与心理健康治疗:一项试点研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 13;8(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01131-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare Payment for Behavioral Health Integration.医疗保险对行为健康整合的支付
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):405-407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1614134. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
2
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.CONSORT 2010声明:随机对照试验和可行性试验的扩展
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8. eCollection 2016.
3
Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members.寻求治疗的军人中创伤后应激障碍检查表-5(PCL-5)的心理测量分析。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1392-1403. doi: 10.1037/pas0000260. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)在退伍军人中的心理测量特性
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1379-1391. doi: 10.1037/pas0000254. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
5
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5):编制与初步心理测量评估
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
6
Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.抑郁症治疗中有效协作护理的特征:74项随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta回归分析
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e108114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108114. eCollection 2014.
7
Implementing brief cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care: A pilot study.在初级保健中实施简短认知行为疗法:一项试点研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2014 Jun;4(2):175-83. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0248-6.
8
Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.医疗环境中的动机性访谈:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):157-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
9
Collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions: cumulative meta-analysis and metaregression to guide future research and implementation.精神健康状况的协作式慢性病管理模式:累积荟萃分析和元回归以指导未来的研究和实施。
Med Care. 2013 Oct;51(10):922-30. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a3e4c4.
10
Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.抑郁症和焦虑症的协作护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD006525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2.

解决精神健康协作式照护实施中的常见挑战:宾夕法尼亚综合关怀计划。

Addressing Common Challenges in the Implementation of Collaborative Care for Mental Health: The Penn Integrated Care Program.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):148-156. doi: 10.1370/afm.2651.

DOI:10.1370/afm.2651
PMID:33685876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7939709/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We developed and implemented a new model of collaborative care that includes a triage and referral management system. We present initial implementation metrics using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

METHODS

Primary care clinicians in 8 practices referred patients with any unmet mental health needs to the Penn Integrated Care program. Assessments were conducted using validated measures. Patients were primarily triaged to collaborative care (26%) or specialty mental health care with active referral management (70%). We conducted 50 qualitative interviews to understand the implementation process and inform program refinement. Our primary outcomes were reach and implementation metrics, including referral and encounter rates derived from the electronic health record.

RESULTS

In 12 months, 6,124 unique patients were referred. Assessed patients reported symptoms consistent with a range of conditions from mild to moderate depression and anxiety to serious mental illnesses including psychosis and acute suicidal ideation. Among patients enrolled in collaborative care, treatment entailed a mean of 7.2 (SD 5.1) encounters over 78.1 (SD 51.3) days. Remission of symptoms was achieved by 32.6% of patients with depression and 39.5% of patients with anxiety. Stakeholders viewed the program favorably and had concrete suggestions to ensure sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

The Penn Integrated Care program demonstrated broad reach. Implementation was consistent with collaborative care as delivered in seminal studies of the model. Our results provide insight into a model for launching and implementing collaborative care to meet the needs of a diverse group of patients with the full range of mental health conditions seen in primary care.

摘要

目的

我们开发并实施了一种新的协作式护理模式,其中包括分诊和转介管理系统。我们使用 Reach、Effectiveness、Adoption、Implementation、Maintenance(RE-AIM)框架呈现初步实施指标。

方法

8 家诊所的初级保健临床医生将有任何未满足的心理健康需求的患者转介到宾夕法尼亚综合护理计划。评估采用经过验证的措施进行。患者主要分诊到协作护理(26%)或有积极转介管理的专业心理健康护理(70%)。我们进行了 50 次定性访谈,以了解实施过程并为计划改进提供信息。我们的主要结果是转介和实施指标,包括从电子健康记录中得出的转介和就诊率。

结果

在 12 个月内,有 6124 名独特的患者被转介。接受评估的患者报告的症状与从轻度到中度抑郁和焦虑到严重精神疾病(包括精神病和急性自杀意念)等各种疾病一致。在接受协作护理的患者中,治疗涉及平均 7.2 次(SD=5.1)就诊,历时 78.1 天(SD=51.3)。32.6%的抑郁症患者和 39.5%的焦虑症患者症状缓解。利益相关者对该计划持积极态度,并提出了确保可持续性的具体建议。

结论

宾夕法尼亚综合护理计划的覆盖范围很广。实施情况与协作式护理模式的开创性研究中提供的护理模式一致。我们的研究结果为启动和实施协作式护理以满足初级保健中各种精神健康状况患者的需求提供了深入了解。