Monash Health School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3186, Australia.
Prince of Wales Clinical School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, 2031, Australia.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;47(4):455-466. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06356-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
To quantify potential heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE), of early sedation with dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared with usual care, and identify patients who have a high probability of lower or higher 90-day mortality according to age, and other identified clusters.
Bayesian analysis of 3904 critically ill adult patients expected to receive invasive ventilation > 24 h and enrolled in a multinational randomized controlled trial comparing early DEX with usual care sedation.
HTE was assessed according to age and clusters (based on 12 baseline characteristics) using a Bayesian hierarchical models. DEX was associated with lower 90-day mortality compared to usual care in patients > 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.83 [95% credible interval [CrI] 0.68-1.00], with 97.7% probability of reduced mortality across broad categories of illness severity. Conversely, the probability of increased mortality in patients ≤ 65 years was 98.5% (OR 1.26 [95% CrI 1.02-1.56]. Two clusters were identified: cluster 1 (976 patients) mostly operative, and cluster 2 (2346 patients), predominantly non-operative. There was a greater probability of benefit with DEX in cluster 1 (OR 0.86 [95% CrI 0.65-1.14]) across broad categories of age, with 86.4% probability that DEX is more beneficial in cluster 1 than cluster 2.
In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, early sedation with dexmedetomidine exhibited a high probability of reduced 90-day mortality in older patients regardless of operative or non-operative cluster status. Conversely, a high probability of increased 90-day mortality was observed in younger patients of non-operative status. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
量化右美托咪定(DEX)早期镇静相对于常规治疗的治疗效果(HTE)的潜在异质性,并根据年龄和其他确定的聚类来识别具有较高或较低 90 天死亡率的患者。
对 3904 名预计接受侵入性通气>24 小时的重症成年患者进行贝叶斯分析,这些患者参与了一项多国随机对照试验,比较了早期 DEX 与常规镇静治疗。
根据年龄和聚类(基于 12 项基线特征)使用贝叶斯层次模型评估 HTE。与常规治疗相比,DEX 与>65 岁患者的 90 天死亡率降低相关(优势比 [OR],0.83 [95%可信区间 [CrI],0.68-1.00],在广泛的疾病严重程度类别中降低死亡率的概率为 97.7%。相反,≤65 岁患者死亡率增加的概率为 98.5%(OR 1.26 [95% CrI 1.02-1.56])。确定了两个聚类:聚类 1(976 名患者)主要是手术患者,聚类 2(2346 名患者)主要是非手术患者。在广泛的年龄类别中,DEX 在聚类 1 中获益的可能性更大(OR 0.86 [95% CrI 0.65-1.14]),DEX 在聚类 1 中比聚类 2 更有益的概率为 86.4%。
在接受机械通气的重症患者中,DEX 早期镇静治疗无论手术或非手术聚类状态如何,高龄患者 90 天死亡率降低的可能性较大。相反,非手术状态的年轻患者 90 天死亡率增加的可能性较大。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现。