Wang Linsheng, Qin Yuanlin, Zhu Laimin, Li Xiaoyu, Chen Yueqin, Zhang Lihong
Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, 272029, China.
The Second Clinical College of Jining Medical University, Jining, 272000, China.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb;279(2):695-702. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06700-0. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
To characterize the auditory and imaging markers of atypical enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA).
15 EVA cases (26 ears) confirmed via high-resolution MRI (HRMRI) that did not meet the Valvassori criterion on high-resolution CT (HRCT) were classified as atypical EVA. Another 21 EVA cases (40 ears) meeting the Valvassori criterion were randomly chosen as typical EVA. The hearing loss (HL), HRCT, and HRMRI findings were compared between the two groups.
The difference of HL severity between atypical and typical EVA was not statistically significant (χ = 0.12, P > 0.05. The vestibular aqueducts (VA) of atypical EVA cases manifested as borderline dilation (n = 17), focal dilation (n = 3), and normal appearance (n = 6) on the HRCT. The midpoint width of atypical and typical EVA cases was 1.06 ± 0.18 mm and 2.10 ± 0.55 mm, respectively, exhibiting a significant difference (t = - 9.20, P < 0.05). In the HRMRI, the degree of dilation and shape of the intraosseous partition of endolymphatic duct and sac (ES) was similar to that of VA on HRCT, while their extraosseous ES was depicted variable slighter dilation compared to that of typical one, the difference between them was statistically significant (t = - 4.10, P < 0.05).
The HL severity of atypical EVA ears was similar to that of typical ones. Nevertheless, borderline, focal dilation and normal-like appearance of VAs on HRCT and variablely slighter dilation of the extraosseous ES on HRMRI are its characteristic imaging findings.
明确非典型大前庭导水管(EVA)的听觉及影像学特征。
15例经高分辨率磁共振成像(HRMRI)确诊但不符合高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)瓦尔瓦索里标准的EVA患者(26耳)被归类为非典型EVA。另外随机选取21例符合瓦尔瓦索里标准的EVA患者(40耳)作为典型EVA。比较两组的听力损失(HL)、HRCT及HRMRI表现。
非典型与典型EVA的HL严重程度差异无统计学意义(χ=0.12,P>0.05)。非典型EVA患者的前庭导水管(VA)在HRCT上表现为临界扩张(n=17)、局灶性扩张(n=3)及外观正常(n=6)。非典型与典型EVA患者的中点宽度分别为1.06±0.18mm和2.10±0.55mm,差异有统计学意义(t=-9.20,P<0.05)。在HRMRI中,内淋巴管及囊(ES)骨内部分的扩张程度及形态与HRCT上的VA相似,但其骨外ES的扩张程度较典型者稍轻,差异有统计学意义(t=-4.10,P<0.05)。
非典型EVA耳的HL严重程度与典型者相似。然而,HRCT上VA的临界、局灶性扩张及类似正常外观,以及HRMRI上骨外ES的稍轻扩张是其特征性影像学表现。