Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Exp Brain Res. 2021 May;239(5):1507-1516. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06074-z. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
Bimanual coordination is essential for the performance of many everyday tasks. There are several types of bimanually coordinated movements, classified according to whether the arms are acting to achieve a single goal (cooperative) or separate goals (independent), and whether the arms are moving symmetrically or asymmetrically. Symmetric bimanual movements are thought to facilitate corticomotor excitability (CME), while asymmetric bimanual movements are thought to recruit interhemispheric inhibition to reduce functional coupling between the motor cortices. The influences of movement symmetry and goal conceptualisation on interhemispheric interactions have not been studied together, and not during bimanually active dynamic tasks. The present study used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the modulation of CME and short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI and LIHI, respectively) during bimanually active dynamic tasks requiring different types of bimanual coordination. Twenty healthy right-handed adults performed four bimanual tasks in which they held a dumbbell in each hand (independent) or a custom device between both hands (cooperative) while rhythmically flexing and extending their wrists symmetrically or asymmetrically. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the right extensor carpi ulnaris. We found CME was greater during asymmetric tasks than symmetric tasks, and movement symmetry did not modulate SIHI or LIHI. There was no effect of goal conceptualisation nor any interaction with movement symmetry for CME, SIHI or LIHI. Based on these results, movement symmetry and goal conceptualisation may not modulate interhemispheric inhibition during dynamic bimanual tasks. These findings contradict prevailing thinking about the roles of CME and interhemispheric inhibition in bimanual coordination.
双手协调对于完成许多日常任务至关重要。双手协调运动有几种类型,根据手臂是为了实现单一目标(协作)还是不同目标(独立)而运动,以及手臂是否对称或不对称运动来进行分类。对称的双手运动被认为可以促进皮质运动兴奋性(CME),而不对称的双手运动被认为可以募集半球间抑制作用以减少运动皮质之间的功能耦合。运动对称性和目标概念化对半球间相互作用的影响尚未在双手主动动态任务中同时进行研究。本研究使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)来研究 CME 以及短潜伏期和长潜伏期半球间抑制(分别为 SIHI 和 LIHI)在需要不同类型双手协调的双手主动动态任务中的调制。20 名健康的右利手成年人进行了四项双手任务,他们分别用双手握住哑铃(独立)或双手握住定制装置(协作),同时对称或不对称地节律性弯曲和伸展手腕。从右手伸腕肌记录运动诱发电位。我们发现不对称任务中的 CME 大于对称任务,运动对称性不会调制 SIHI 或 LIHI。目标概念化没有影响,CME、SIHI 或 LIHI 也没有与运动对称性的相互作用。基于这些结果,运动对称性和目标概念化在动态双手任务中可能不会调制半球间抑制。这些发现与关于 CME 和半球间抑制在双手协调中的作用的普遍观点相矛盾。