• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用景观指标评估森林残余物的脆弱性。巴西和葡萄牙流域之间的比较。

Assessing the fragility of forest remnants by using landscape metrics. Comparison between river basins in Brazil and Portugal.

作者信息

da Silva Alessandra Leite, de Nunes Adélia Jesus Nobre, Marques Mara Lúcia, Ribeiro Admilson Írio, Longo Regina Márcia

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Environmental Sciences, Paulista State University (UNESP), Rua Quirino de Andrade 215, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Geography and Tourism CEGOT- Centre of Studies in Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Coimbra (UC), Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Mar 9;193(4):172. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-08953-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-021-08953-y
PMID:33687583
Abstract

The environmental vulnerability of a landscape is directly associated with any physical, geomorphological, and spatial factors which directly interfere with the ecological functionality of natural areas. Therefore, the composition, diversity, and structure of fragmented forest areas are essential to identify the patterns in the landscape and propose the most appropriate management measures for its conservation. The present study set out to analyse the applicability of landscape metrics for assessing the environmental fragility of forest remnants of different geographical conditions and phyto-physiognomies. This would contribute to landscape assessment and the diagnosis of remnants, and support decision making for strategic and effective environmental planning. The study areas selected were two river basins, the Atibaia river basin in Brazil, and the Cértima river basin in Portugal. The maps used as a basis for the selection of the forest remnants analysed were made available by public managers and date from 2015 for both basins. The analyses were performed with GIS software, and two groups of landscape metrics were considered: the first applied to the general landscape of the basin and the second applied to each remaining forest patch as a landscape unit. At the remaining forest level, the metrics analysed were the area, central area index, circularity index, shape index, distance from the nearest neighbour, proximity of the remnant to the road network, and proximity to the watercourse. The results showed that there are many remnants in both basins with predominantly small size and located close to each other. However, their fragilities vary in each basin, indicating that the applied metrics are effective tool for the preliminary diagnosis of natural vegetation remnants in areas with different geospatial and phyto-physiognomic conditions. Therefore, the results obtained are of great importance as a basis for formulating landscape development policies, by integrating appropriate land management strategies.

摘要

景观的环境脆弱性与直接干扰自然区域生态功能的任何物理、地貌和空间因素直接相关。因此,破碎森林区域的组成、多样性和结构对于识别景观格局以及提出最适当的保护管理措施至关重要。本研究旨在分析景观指标在评估不同地理条件和植物外貌的森林残余地环境脆弱性方面的适用性。这将有助于景观评估和残余地诊断,并为战略和有效的环境规划决策提供支持。所选研究区域为两个流域,巴西的阿蒂巴亚河流域和葡萄牙的塞尔蒂马河流域。作为分析所选森林残余地基础的地图由公共管理者提供,两个流域的地图日期均为2015年。分析使用GIS软件进行,并考虑了两组景观指标:第一组应用于流域的总体景观,第二组应用于每个剩余的森林斑块作为一个景观单元。在剩余森林层面,分析的指标包括面积、中心面积指数、圆形度指数、形状指数、到最近邻的距离、残余地与道路网络的接近度以及与水道的接近度。结果表明,两个流域都有许多主要面积较小且彼此相邻的残余地。然而,它们在每个流域的脆弱性各不相同, 这表明所应用的指标是在不同地理空间和植物外貌条件下对自然植被残余地进行初步诊断的有效工具。因此,通过整合适当的土地管理策略,所获得的结果作为制定景观发展政策的基础具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Assessing the fragility of forest remnants by using landscape metrics. Comparison between river basins in Brazil and Portugal.利用景观指标评估森林残余物的脆弱性。巴西和葡萄牙流域之间的比较。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Mar 9;193(4):172. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-08953-y.
2
Assessing the environmental destruction in forest ecosystems using landscape metrics and spatial analysis.利用景观指标和空间分析评估森林生态系统中的环境破坏。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 13;13(1):15165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42251-6.
3
Top 10+1 indicators for assessing forest ecosystem conditions: A five-decade fragmentation analysis.评估森林生态系统状况的十大+1指标:五十年碎片化分析
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 20;957:177527. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177527. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
4
Landscape changes in a neotropical forest-savanna ecotone zone in central Brazil: The role of protected areas in the maintenance of native vegetation.巴西中部新热带森林-稀树草原生态交错带的景观变化:保护区在维持原生植被方面的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Feb 1;187:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
5
Studying land use dynamics using decadal satellite images and Dyna-CLUE model in the Mahanadi River basin, India.利用十年期卫星图像和 Dyna-CLUE 模型研究印度马哈纳迪河流域的土地利用动态。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 27;191(Suppl 3):804. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7698-3.
6
Modelling of soil erosion susceptibility incorporating sediment connectivity and export at landscape scale using integrated machine learning, InVEST-SDR and Fragstats.采用集成机器学习、InVEST-SDR 和 Fragstats 模型,在景观尺度上综合考虑泥沙连通性和输出对土壤侵蚀敏感性进行建模。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 27;353:120164. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120164. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
7
Forest fragmentation dynamics in the direct influence area of Iguaçu National Park, Brazil.
Environ Monit Assess. 2025 Feb 27;197(3):334. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-13801-4.
8
Forest restoration improves habitat and water quality in tropical streams: A multiscale landscape assessment.森林恢复改善热带溪流的栖息地和水质:一项多尺度景观评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Feb 1;963:178256. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178256. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
9
Measuring the zonal responses of nitrogen output to landscape pattern in a flatland with river network: a case study in Taihu Lake Basin, China.测量平原河网地区氮输出对景观格局的纬向响应:以中国太湖流域为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(23):34624-34636. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15842-x. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
10
Association between forest resources and water availability: temporal analysis of the Serra Azul stream sub-basin.森林资源与水资源供应的关系:塞拉阿祖尔溪流子流域的时间分析。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2022 Oct 7;94(3):e20201289. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202220201289. eCollection 2022.