不同品牌聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯表面能对[具体内容]黏附性的影响：一项[具体类型]研究 。（原文中“the Adherence of : An Study.”部分内容缺失，导致翻译不够完整准确）
Influence of the Surface Energy of Different Brands of Polymethyl Methacrylate on the Adherence of : An Study.
作者信息
Cabanillas Betty, Mallma-Medina Adrián, Petkova-Gueorguieva Marieta, Alvitez-Temoche Daniel, Mendoza Román, Mayta-Tovalino Frank
机构信息
Academic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima, Peru.
Academic Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
出版信息
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021 Jan 30;11(1):6-12. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_291_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on the adherence of ATCC 10231 in an study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study had an , longitudinal, and comparative experimental design. The following groups were made: (1) Vitacryl versus controls (water, dimethyl sulfoxide, glycerol, diethylene glycol, and formamide); (2) Triplex versus the same controls; (3) Vitacryl versus Triplex (surface energy); and (4) Vitacryl versus Triplex (adhesion per cell/field). Adhesion was measured in the area of each field magnified 10 × 10, and with an increase in magnification to 40 × 10, very dense colonies of 0.152 mm were observed.
RESULTS
The surface energy of Vitacryl and Triplex was 40.3 ± 0.3 and 39.5 ± 0.3N/m, respectively, showing statistically significant differences ( < 0.001). On the contrary, in relation to the adhesion per cell/field of , Vitacryl presented 15.7 ± 1.1, whereas Triplex had 16.7 ± 2.3, with no significant differences ( = 0.058).
CONCLUSION
In relation to the adhesion per cell/field of , there was no evidence of significant differences between Vitacryl and Triplex.
目的
本研究的目的是在一项研究中评估不同品牌聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯（PMMA）的表面能对ATCC 10231黏附的影响。
材料与方法
本研究采用前瞻性、纵向和对比性实验设计。设置了以下几组：（1）维他克利与对照组（水、二甲基亚砜、甘油、二甘醇和甲酰胺）；（2）特里普莱克斯与相同对照组；（3）维他克利与特里普莱克斯（表面能）；（4）维他克利与特里普莱克斯（每细胞/视野的黏附情况）。在放大10×10的每个视野区域测量黏附情况，当放大倍数增加到40×10时，观察到直径为0.152毫米的非常密集的菌落。
结果
维他克利和特里普莱克斯的表面能分别为40.3±0.3和39.5±0.3N/m，显示出统计学上的显著差异（P<0.001）。相反，就每细胞/视野的黏附情况而言，维他克利为15.7±1.1，而特里普莱克斯为16.7±2.3，无显著差异（P=0.058）。
结论
就每细胞/视野的黏附情况而言，没有证据表明维他克利和特里普莱克斯之间存在显著差异。
Zotero 插件