Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Phoniatrics and Speech Language Therapy, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;278(7):2387-2395. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06714-8. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
In clinical practice, laryngo(strobo)scopy (LS) is still mainly used for diagnostics and management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UFVP), although only laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) can provide information on causes of vocal fold immobility, especially on possible synkinetic reinnervation after recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury. The goal of this retrospective study was the evaluation whether signs of synkinetic reinnervation in LS can be objectified in comparison to LEMG data.
Between 1/2015 and 2/2018, 50 patients with laryngostroboscopically suspected UVFP received routine LEMG examination. The LEMG findings were retrospectively compared with LS findings. The LEMG data analysis focused on the diagnosis of synkinetic reinnervation of the TA/LCA and/or PCA. The digital LS recordings were retrospectively re-evaluated by phoniatricians considering 22 selected laryngostroboscopic parameters.
LEMG revealed synkinesis in 23 (46%) and absence of synkinesis in 27 (54%) patients. None of the 22 parameters showed significant association between patients with synkinetic reinnervation and LS findings. The only laryngostroboscopic parameter that was significantly associated with a silent LEMG signal compared to single fiber activity in LEMG was a length difference on the side of the UVFP (p-value 0.0001; OR 14.5 (95% CI 3.047-66.81; Sensitivity 0.5; Specificity 0.9355).
Our findings show that synkinesis cannot be diagnosed using only LS. This study underlines the importance of LEMG in clinical routine for detection of laryngeal synkinesis in patients with UVFP before any further therapeutic steps are initiated to avoid later therapy failure.
在临床实践中,喉(声)镜检查(LS)主要仍用于单侧声带麻痹(UFVP)的诊断和管理,尽管只有喉肌电图(LEMG)才能提供声带活动障碍的原因信息,特别是在喉返神经(RLN)损伤后可能出现的协同性再神经支配。本回顾性研究的目的是评估 LS 中协同性再神经支配的迹象是否可以与 LEMG 数据进行客观比较。
在 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 2 月期间,50 例 LS 疑似单侧声带麻痹的患者接受了常规 LEMG 检查。回顾性比较 LEMG 检查结果与 LS 检查结果。LEMG 数据分析侧重于 TA/LCA 和/或 PCA 协同性再神经支配的诊断。喉科医师回顾性地重新评估了数字 LS 记录,并考虑了 22 个选定的喉声镜参数。
LEMG 显示 23 例(46%)存在协同性,27 例(54%)不存在协同性。在 22 个参数中,没有一个参数与 LEMG 检查结果之间存在显著关联。与 LEMG 中单纤维活动相比,LS 检查中唯一与 UVFP 侧声带长度差异显著相关的参数是(p 值 0.0001;OR 14.5(95%CI 3.047-66.81;灵敏度 0.5;特异性 0.9355)。
我们的研究结果表明,仅使用 LS 无法诊断协同性。本研究强调了 LEMG 在临床常规中的重要性,以在开始任何进一步的治疗步骤之前,检测单侧声带麻痹患者的喉协同性,以避免以后的治疗失败。