David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
UCLA Samueli School of Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Center for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics (C-MIT), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Jun;32(6):882-889. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
To compare the performance of a dual-lumen flushable drainage catheter to a conventional catheter for complex fluid collection drainage.
Two prototype catheters (20- and 28-F) were created by incorporating a customized infusion lumen within the wall of a large-bore conventional drainage catheter, which facilitated simultaneous irrigation of the drainage lumen and the targeted collection via inward- and outward-facing infusion side holes. These were tested against unaltered 20- and 28-F conventional catheters to determine if the injection of a dedicated flush lumen improved rapidity and completeness of gravity drainage. In vitro models were created to simulate serous fluid, purulent/exudative fluid, particulate debris, and acute hematoma.
In the purulent model, mean drainage rate was 19.9 ± 8.0 and 9.5±1.4 mL/min for the 20-F prototype and control (P < .001) and 63.9 ± 4.3 and 35.4 ± 3.4 mL/min for the 28-F prototype and control (P = .006), respectively, with complete drainage achieved in all trials. In the particulate model, mean drainage rate was 24.5 ± 9.7 and 12.0 ± 12.5 mL/min for the 28-F prototype and control (P = .003), respectively, with 69.0% versus 41.1% total drainage achieved over 24 minutes (P = .029). In the hematoma model, mean drainage rate was 22.7 ± 4.6 and 4.8 ± 4.3 mL/min for the 28-F prototype and control (P = .022), respectively, with 80.3% versus 20.1% drainage achieved over 15 minutes (P = .003). Particulate and hematoma 20-F prototypes and conventional trials failed due to immediate occlusion.
The proposed dual-lumen drainage catheter with irrigation of a dedicated flush lumen improved evacuation of complex fluid collections in vitro.
比较双腔冲洗引流导管与传统导管在复杂积液引流中的性能。
通过在大口径传统引流导管的壁内创建一个定制的输注腔,创建了两个原型导管(20-和 28-F),这使得同时冲洗引流腔和通过向内和向外的输注侧孔靶向收集成为可能。将这些与未经改变的 20-和 28-F 传统导管进行测试,以确定专门冲洗腔的注入是否可以提高重力引流的速度和彻底性。创建了体外模型来模拟浆液性流体、脓性/渗出性流体、颗粒状碎片和急性血肿。
在脓性模型中,20-F 原型和对照的平均引流率分别为 19.9±8.0 和 9.5±1.4 mL/min(P<.001),28-F 原型和对照的平均引流率分别为 63.9±4.3 和 35.4±3.4 mL/min(P=0.006),所有试验均实现完全引流。在颗粒模型中,28-F 原型和对照的平均引流率分别为 24.5±9.7 和 12.0±12.5 mL/min(P=0.003),24 分钟时总引流率分别为 69.0%和 41.1%(P=0.029)。在血肿模型中,28-F 原型和对照的平均引流率分别为 22.7±4.6 和 4.8±4.3 mL/min(P=0.022),15 分钟时总引流率分别为 80.3%和 20.1%(P=0.003)。颗粒状和血肿 20-F 原型和传统试验由于立即阻塞而失败。
在体外,带有专用冲洗腔冲洗的拟议双腔引流导管改善了复杂积液的清除。