Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia;
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Public Health Res Pract. 2021 Mar 10;31(1):30122004. doi: 10.17061/phrp30122004.
The Stepping On program has been shown to prevent falls among community-dwelling people in a research setting and was implemented statewide by the New South Wales (NSW) Ministry of Health in 2008. This study measured ongoing fall prevention strategies and behaviours undertaken by Stepping On participants during the 6 months after program completion. Secondary objectives were to document participant satisfaction with the program, and to identify motivators for, and barriers to, fall prevention behaviour and uptake of the strategy.
We conducted a pre-post prospective study among Stepping On program participants, with 6-month follow-up. Participants commenced Stepping On in 2015 and 2016 in 15 Local Health Districts across NSW. A study-specific survey was completed at baseline and 6 months after completion of Stepping On. Measures were current self-reported fall prevention strategies and behaviours; the Falls Behavioural (FaB) Scale; the Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire (IPEQ); and motivators for, and barriers to, uptake of fall prevention strategies and behaviours.
Baseline questionnaires were completed by 458 participants (mean age 77; standard deviation [SD] 6.7; 76% female). Both baseline and follow-up surveys were completed by 291 participants (64%; mean age 78; SD 6.9; 76% female). Program satisfaction was high - 251 participants (86%); completed the whole program, 284 (98%) said it increased their awareness of falls, and 284 (98%) would recommend Stepping On to others. There were statistically significant increases in the proportion of participants who reported doing regular balance and strength exercise (74% vs 24%; p < 0.0001), and using safe walking strategies (78% vs 51%; p < 0.0001) at follow-up compared with baseline. There was also a significant improvement in the FaB Scale, indicating less risk-taking behaviour (mean increase 0.15 out of 4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12, 0.19; p < 0.0001), and an increase in IPEQ-reported structured exercise (mean increase 2.0 hours per week; 95% CI 1.6, 2.5; p < 0.0001). The main motivators for, and barriers to, uptake of structured exercise included participants' health, availability and access to local programs, and the amount of time available to take part.
This study demonstrates the appeal of the Stepping On program, and its positive impact on fall prevention behaviours among adults in the community aged 65 years and older. It is important to note the study limitations - namely, the self-reported nature of the measures used and the large amount of missing data.
踏脚石计划已被证明可以预防社区居民的跌倒,并于 2008 年由新南威尔士州(新州)卫生部在全州范围内实施。本研究旨在评估踏脚石计划参与者在计划完成后的 6 个月内持续采取的预防跌倒策略和行为。次要目标是记录参与者对该计划的满意度,并确定预防跌倒行为和采用该策略的动机和障碍。
我们对新州 15 个地方卫生区的踏脚石计划参与者进行了一项前瞻性研究,随访 6 个月。参与者于 2015 年和 2016 年参加踏脚石计划。研究采用特定的调查问卷,分别在基线和踏脚石计划完成后 6 个月进行。评估指标包括当前自我报告的预防跌倒策略和行为;跌倒行为量表(FaB 量表);偶然和计划锻炼问卷(IPEQ);以及预防跌倒策略和行为采用的动机和障碍。
458 名参与者(平均年龄 77 岁,标准差 [SD] 6.7,76%为女性)完成了基线问卷。291 名参与者(64%,平均年龄 78 岁,SD 6.9,76%为女性)完成了基线和随访调查。项目满意度高-251 名参与者(86%)完成了整个项目,284 名参与者(98%)表示该项目提高了他们对跌倒的认识,284 名参与者(98%)会向他人推荐踏脚石计划。与基线相比,报告定期进行平衡和力量锻炼的参与者比例(74%比 24%;p<0.0001)和使用安全行走策略的比例(78%比 51%;p<0.0001)均有统计学显著增加。FaB 量表也有显著改善,表明冒险行为减少(平均增加 0.15,范围为 0.12-0.19;p<0.0001),IPEQ 报告的结构化锻炼增加(平均每周增加 2.0 小时;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.6-2.5;p<0.0001)。采用结构化锻炼的主要动机和障碍包括参与者的健康状况、当地计划的可用性和可及性,以及参与的可用时间。
本研究表明踏脚石计划具有吸引力,并对社区中 65 岁及以上成年人的跌倒预防行为产生积极影响。需要注意的是,本研究存在一定的局限性,即所使用措施的自我报告性质以及大量缺失数据。