Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 18;23(9):1527-1535. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab038.
Little is known about the relationship between smoke-free laws and persistent disparities in secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among nonsmoking adults in the United States.
We constructed time-varying smoke-free law measures representing whether or not at least 50% of each US county's population was covered by smoke-free laws in workplaces and hospitality venues (restaurants/bars). We merged these data with restricted data on cotinine-derived SHS exposure among nonsmokers from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2014 (N = 25 444). Using logistic regression, we estimated associations between smoke-free law coverage and SHS exposure among all nonsmokers, and within age strata (25-39, 40-59, 60+). We explored differential associations by gender, race/ethnicity, education, and poverty-income ratio (PIR) by testing the significance of interactions terms for the full sample and within age strata.
In adjusted models, hospitality coverage was associated with lower odds of SHS exposure in the full sample (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51-0.76), and within each age group, with ORs ranging from 0.58 (ages 25-39) to 0.67 (ages 60+). Workplace coverage was associated with lower SHS exposure only among younger adults (OR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.65-0.99). Within the full sample and among adults ages 40-59, hospitality laws were associated with narrowing SHS exposure differentials between males and females. Among adults ages 40-59, workplace laws were associated with narrowing exposure differentials between males and females, but worsening exposure disparities by PIR.
Smoke-free laws may reduce SHS exposure among adult nonsmokers, but may be insufficient to improve disparities in SHS exposure.
In a repeated cross-sectional sample of adult nonsmokers, smoke-free laws in hospitality venues were consistently associated with lower odds of SHS exposure and appeared to narrow exposure differentials between males and females. Associations between workplace smoke-free laws and SHS exposure were variable by age. Among adults ages 40-59, workplace laws were associated with narrowing exposure differentials between males and females while exacerbating exposure differentials by PIR. Differential patterns of association highlight the need to examine the impacts of tobacco control policies on downstream health equity.
在美国,非吸烟成年人持续存在二手烟(SHS)暴露方面的差异,但关于无烟法律与这些差异之间的关系知之甚少。
我们构建了时变无烟法律措施,以表示美国每个县至少有 50%的人口是否在工作场所和招待场所(餐馆/酒吧)中受到无烟法律的覆盖。我们将这些数据与 1999-2014 年全国健康和营养检查调查中关于非吸烟者体内可替宁衍生的 SHS 暴露的受限数据进行了合并(N=25444)。使用逻辑回归,我们估计了无烟法律覆盖范围与所有非吸烟者之间以及在年龄阶层(25-39 岁、40-59 岁、60 岁以上)内的 SHS 暴露之间的关联。我们通过测试交互项的显著性,在全样本和年龄阶层内探索了性别、种族/民族、教育和贫困收入比(PIR)差异的相关性。
在调整后的模型中,招待场所的覆盖范围与全样本中 SHS 暴露的可能性降低有关(比值比[OR] = 0.62;95%置信区间[CI] = 0.51-0.76),并且在每个年龄组中,OR 值范围从 0.58(25-39 岁)到 0.67(60 岁以上)。仅在年轻成年人中,工作场所的覆盖范围与较低的 SHS 暴露相关(OR=0.81;95%CI=0.65-0.99)。在全样本和 40-59 岁的成年人中,招待场所法律与缩小男女之间 SHS 暴露差异有关。在 40-59 岁的成年人中,工作场所法律与缩小男女之间的暴露差异有关,但通过 PIR 加剧了暴露差异。
无烟法律可能会降低成年非吸烟者的 SHS 暴露,但可能不足以改善 SHS 暴露的差异。
在非吸烟成年人的重复横断面样本中,招待场所的无烟法律始终与较低的 SHS 暴露几率相关,并且似乎缩小了男女之间的暴露差异。工作场所无烟法律与 SHS 暴露之间的关联因年龄而异。在 40-59 岁的成年人中,工作场所法律与缩小男女之间的暴露差异有关,同时通过 PIR 加剧了暴露差异。关联的差异模式突出表明需要检查烟草控制政策对下游健康公平的影响。