Shao Yue, Zhang Min, Ye Liu, Chen Dan, Wu Qing-Chen, Zhang Cheng
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
The First Branch, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;10(4):3826-3835. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2126. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
The aim of this study was to explore the impact of chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on prognosis in metastatic esophageal cancer (mEC) patients.
Information of patients with mEC from 2010 to 2016 was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Demographic and clinical data between CT and CRT groups were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce the influence of potential confounding factors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate prognostic factors. Moreover, interaction tests and survival analyses were performed to determine whether pathological type conferred any survival benefits in subgroups.
A total of 3,352 mEC patients were recruited including 1,697 CT patients and 1,655 CRT patients. In multivariable Cox regression, marital status, gender and pathological type were identified as independent prognostic factors for mEC. There was no statistical significance between the CT group and CRT group in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the matched and unmatched cohort. In subgroup analyses, patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) undergoing CT had favorable prognosis. However, in the subgroup of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), patients in the CT group had worse outcomes compared with patients in the CRT group.
Patients with EAC and ESCC could respectively benefit from CT and CRT. Besides, we recommend individualizing the treatment strategy for mEC based on the pathological type.
本研究旨在探讨化疗(CT)和放化疗(CRT)对转移性食管癌(mEC)患者预后的影响。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中检索2010年至2016年mEC患者的信息。比较CT组和CRT组之间的人口统计学和临床数据。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析来减少潜在混杂因素的影响。使用多变量Cox回归分析来评估预后因素。此外,进行交互检验和生存分析以确定病理类型在亚组中是否带来任何生存益处。
共纳入3352例mEC患者,其中1697例为CT患者,1655例为CRT患者。在多变量Cox回归中,婚姻状况、性别和病理类型被确定为mEC的独立预后因素。在匹配和未匹配队列中,CT组和CRT组在总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)方面无统计学差异。在亚组分析中,接受CT治疗的食管腺癌(EAC)患者预后良好。然而,在食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)亚组中,CT组患者的结局比CRT组患者更差。
EAC和ESCC患者可分别从CT和CRT中获益。此外,我们建议根据病理类型对mEC的治疗策略进行个体化。