Suppr超能文献

匈牙利肺移植联合肺康复的有效性

The effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in connection with lung transplantation in Hungary.

作者信息

Kerti Maria, Bohacs Anikó, Madurka Ildiko, Kovats Zsuzsanna, Gieszer Balazs, Elek Jenő, Renyi-Vamos Ferenc, Varga Janos Tamas

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, National Koranyi Institute for Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;10(4):3906-3915. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1783. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of pre- and post-lung transplant rehabilitation is to maintain or improve exercise tolerance, lung mechanics, peripheral and respiratory muscle function. Our aim was to measure the effectiveness of pre- and post-transplant rehabilitation in terms of the changes of functional and quality of life markers.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients (40 COPD FEV1: 21±5%pred, 18 IPF TLC: 42±13%pred, 4 bronchiectasis FEV1: 28±4%pred and 1 alveolitis fibrotisans TLC: 31%pred) participated in a pre- and 14 took part in a post-transplant rehabilitation program (more than 2 months after lung transplantation (LTx), primary diagnoses: 9 COPD, 4 IPF). The rehabilitation program consisted of chest-wall stretching, controlled breathing techniques and personalized exercise of 20-30 minutes by cycling and treadmill 2-3 times per day for 4 weeks. Seven functional and quality of life markers, like lung function, chest wall expansion (CWE), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), breath holding time (BHT) and hand grip strength (HGS) were measured at the onset and the end of the rehabilitation program. The safety profile of the rehabilitation program was followed-up.

RESULTS

Pre-transplant pulmonary rehabilitation resulted in significant improvement in CWE (3.24±1.49 vs. 4.48±1.62 cm), CAT IQR {19 [13-25] vs. 15 [11-21]}, 6MWD (315±118 vs. 375±114 m), P<0.05. FEV1, FVC, mMRC, BHT and HGS did not change significantly. Post-transplant rehabilitation resulted in significant improvement in CWE (3.7±2.1 vs. 6.2±1.8 cm), CAT IQR {17 [11-23] vs. 10 [6-14], BHT (22±14 vs. 35±16 s), FEV1 (73±8 vs. 86±9%pred) and FVC (70±12 vs. 85±14%pred), P<0.05. The 6MWD, mMRC and HGS did not change significantly. No cardiovascular or other side effects were detected during the rehabilitation program.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results underline the importance of perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation in the complex treatment of lung transplant patients in Hungary, as well. There was a limitation because no control group was evaluated without rehabilitation.

摘要

背景

肺移植前后康复的作用是维持或提高运动耐力、肺力学、外周和呼吸肌功能。我们的目的是根据功能和生活质量指标的变化来衡量移植前后康复的效果。

方法

63例患者(40例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1):占预计值的21±5%;18例特发性肺纤维化(IPF),肺总量(TLC):占预计值的42±13%;4例支气管扩张症,FEV1:占预计值的28±4%;1例纤维化肺泡炎,TLC:占预计值的31%)参与了移植前康复,14例患者(肺移植(LTx)后超过2个月,主要诊断:9例COPD,4例IPF)参与了移植后康复项目。康复项目包括胸壁伸展、控制呼吸技术以及个性化运动,每次20 - 30分钟,通过骑自行车和跑步机进行,每天2 - 3次,共4周。在康复项目开始和结束时测量了7项功能和生活质量指标,如肺功能、胸壁扩张度(CWE)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)、屏气时间(BHT)和握力(HGS)。对康复项目的安全性进行了随访。

结果

移植前肺康复使CWE(3.24±1.49 vs. 4.48±1.62 cm)、CAT四分位间距{19 [13 - 25] vs. 15 [11 - 21]}、6MWD(315±11vs. 375±114 m)有显著改善,P<0.05。FEV1、用力肺活量(FVC)、mMRC、BHT和HGS无显著变化。移植后康复使CWE(3.7±2.1 vs. 6.2±1.8 cm)、CAT四分位间距{17 [11 - 23] vs. 10 [6 - 14]}、BHT(22±14 vs. 35±16 s)、FEV1(73±8 vs. 86±9%pred)和FVC(70±12 vs. 85±14%pred)有显著改善,P<0.05。6MWD、mMRC和HGS无显著变化。在康复项目期间未检测到心血管或其他副作用。

结论

我们的结果强调了围手术期肺康复在匈牙利肺移植患者综合治疗中的重要性。存在一个局限性,即没有评估未进行康复的对照组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验