Division of Healthcare Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Department of Health Administration, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
J Healthc Manag. 2021;66(2):95-108. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-20-00087.
Medicare's Hospital Valued-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program measures hospitals' total performance score (TPS); its measurement strategies have changed regularly since its rollout in 2013. Because the program influences care delivery, it is important to examine how the policy has changed hospitals' behavior and how it may inform future policies. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between hospitals' performance on TPS annually from 2013 to 2018 and organizational characteristics. Using the HVBP TPS from 2013 to 2018 and associated hospital characteristics-hospital size, teaching hospital status, system membership, ownership type, urban/rural location, average percentages of patients from Medicare and Medicaid, operating margins, percentages of inpatient revenue as a proportion of total revenue, and case mix index-we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all U.S. hospitals participating in the HVBP program. Regression and panel analyses found that organizations that were expected to have robust and rigid resources were unable to score in the superior category consistently. In addition, organizations were unable to consistently perform positively over time because of changes in the HVBP program measurement and the required organizational responses. Policymakers should consider the ability of organizations to respond to changes to the HVBP program. Likewise, healthcare managers, particularly those in larger organizations, should seek to remove bureaucracy or allow for greater resource slack to meet these changes.
医疗保险的医院基于价值的采购(HVBP)计划衡量医院的总绩效评分(TPS);自 2013 年推出以来,其衡量策略经常发生变化。由于该计划会影响医疗服务的提供,因此了解该政策如何改变医院的行为以及它如何为未来的政策提供信息非常重要。本研究的目的是评估 2013 年至 2018 年期间医院 TPS 年度绩效与组织特征之间的关系。我们使用了 2013 年至 2018 年的 HVBP TPS 以及相关的医院特征(医院规模、教学医院地位、系统成员、所有权类型、城市/农村位置、医疗保险和医疗补助患者的平均比例、运营利润率、住院收入占总收入的比例、病例组合指数),对参与 HVBP 计划的所有美国医院进行了回顾性队列研究。回归和面板分析发现,预计拥有强大而僵化资源的组织无法始终保持卓越类别的得分。此外,由于 HVBP 计划衡量标准的变化以及所需的组织响应,组织无法始终保持积极的表现。政策制定者应考虑组织应对 HVBP 计划变化的能力。同样,医疗保健管理人员,特别是那些在较大组织中的人员,应该寻求消除官僚主义或允许更大的资源缓冲以适应这些变化。