Casals Blai, Dahmen Karin A, Gou Boyuan, Rooke Spencer, Salje Ekhard K H
Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 10;11(1):5590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84688-7.
Acoustic emission (AE) measurements of avalanches in different systems, such as domain movements in ferroics or the collapse of voids in porous materials, cannot be compared with model predictions without a detailed analysis of the AE process. In particular, most AE experiments scale the avalanche energy E, maximum amplitude Amax and duration D as E ~ A and A ~ D with x = 2 and a poorly defined power law distribution for the duration. In contrast, simple mean field theory (MFT) predicts that x = 3 and χ = 2. The disagreement is due to details of the AE measurements: the initial acoustic strain signal of an avalanche is modified by the propagation of the acoustic wave, which is then measured by the detector. We demonstrate, by simple model simulations, that typical avalanches follow the observed AE results with x = 2 and 'half-moon' shapes for the cross-correlation. Furthermore, the size S of an avalanche does not always scale as the square of the maximum AE avalanche amplitude A as predicted by MFT but scales linearly S ~ A. We propose that the AE rise time reflects the atomistic avalanche time profile better than the duration of the AE signal.
在不同系统中,如铁电体中的畴运动或多孔材料中空洞的坍塌,对雪崩进行声发射(AE)测量时,如果不对AE过程进行详细分析,就无法与模型预测结果进行比较。特别是,大多数AE实验将雪崩能量E、最大振幅Amax和持续时间D按E ~ A和A ~ D进行缩放,其中x = 2,且持续时间的幂律分布定义不明确。相比之下,简单平均场理论(MFT)预测x = 3且χ = 2。这种分歧源于AE测量的细节:雪崩的初始声应变信号会因声波传播而改变,然后由探测器进行测量。我们通过简单的模型模拟表明,典型的雪崩遵循观察到的AE结果,x = 2且互相关具有“半月”形状。此外,雪崩的大小S并不总是如MFT预测的那样与最大AE雪崩振幅A的平方成比例,而是线性缩放S ~ A。我们提出,AE上升时间比AE信号的持续时间能更好地反映原子级雪崩的时间轮廓。