• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型动脉粥样硬化——生物可吸收血管支架的长期评估

Neoatherosclerosis - Long-Term Assessment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold.

作者信息

Moriyama Noriaki, Shishido Koki, Tanaka Yutaka, Laine Mika, Saito Shigeru

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital Helsinki Finland.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2019 Nov 16;1(12):543-549. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0100.

DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0100
PMID:33693100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7897685/
Abstract

Although metallic stents improved the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), even the latest generation of drug-eluting stents (DES) is still limited by several factors. The limitations of DES are mainly related to the permanent metallic caging in vessel, chronic inflammatory response to the polymer and adverse effects of antiproliferative drug on endothelial tissue, leading to impaired physiological vasomotor response and late stent-related adverse events such as stent thrombosis and neoatherosclerosis. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS; Abbott Vascular) was designed to overcome these drawbacks of DES by disappearing from the vessel wall. Absorb BVS, however, was withdrawn from the world market because of increased incidence of scaffold thrombosis compared with DES. Importantly, only very limited long-term post-BVS implantation data are available, especially with regard to neoatherosclerosis, which can lead to very late adverse events even after resorption of the scaffold. Therefore, the goal of this review was to highlight the mid to long term clinical outcomes published to date, and to describe the features of the intimal healing process and neoatherosclerosis in the 5 years following Absorb BVS implantation, mainly based on our previous study. This may provide important information on the pathophysiology of the scaffolded vessel for clinicians, and promote identification of future bioresorbable materials for PCI that will minimize the stimulus for neoatherosclerosis.

摘要

尽管金属支架提高了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的安全性和有效性,但即使是最新一代的药物洗脱支架(DES)仍受到多种因素的限制。DES的局限性主要与血管内永久性金属支架、对聚合物的慢性炎症反应以及抗增殖药物对内皮组织的不良反应有关,导致生理血管舒缩反应受损以及晚期支架相关不良事件,如支架血栓形成和新生动脉粥样硬化。生物可吸收血管支架(Absorb BVS;雅培血管)旨在通过从血管壁消失来克服DES的这些缺点。然而,由于与DES相比支架血栓形成发生率增加,Absorb BVS已退出全球市场。重要的是,关于BVS植入后的长期数据非常有限,尤其是关于新生动脉粥样硬化的数据,即使在支架吸收后也可能导致非常晚期的不良事件。因此,本综述的目的是突出迄今为止发表的中长期临床结果,并主要基于我们之前的研究描述Absorb BVS植入后5年内内膜愈合过程和新生动脉粥样硬化的特征。这可能为临床医生提供有关支架血管病理生理学的重要信息,并促进识别未来用于PCI的生物可吸收材料,从而将新生动脉粥样硬化的刺激降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/1be82300d7ed/circrep-1-543-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/a8e448a4cf65/circrep-1-543-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/1b431cd838cc/circrep-1-543-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/f93e8bd36cd3/circrep-1-543-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/641f1c44431c/circrep-1-543-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/1be82300d7ed/circrep-1-543-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/a8e448a4cf65/circrep-1-543-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/1b431cd838cc/circrep-1-543-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/f93e8bd36cd3/circrep-1-543-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/641f1c44431c/circrep-1-543-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa9/7897685/1be82300d7ed/circrep-1-543-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Neoatherosclerosis - Long-Term Assessment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold.新型动脉粥样硬化——生物可吸收血管支架的长期评估
Circ Rep. 2019 Nov 16;1(12):543-549. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0100.
2
The Current Literature on Bioabsorbable Stents: a Review.生物可吸收支架的最新文献综述。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019 Nov 25;21(12):54. doi: 10.1007/s11883-019-0816-4.
3
Vasomotor Function Comparative Assessment at 1 and 2 Years Following Implantation of the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and the Xience V Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent in Porcine Coronary Arteries: Insights From In Vivo Angiography, Ex Vivo Assessment, and Gene Analysis at the Stented/Scaffolded Segments and the Proximal and Distal Edges.在植入 Absorb 依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架和 Xience V 依维莫司洗脱金属支架 1 年和 2 年后的血管舒缩功能比较评估:来自血管内造影、离体评估以及支架/支架段和近端及远端边缘基因分析的体内观察结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 11;9(7):728-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.018.
4
Understanding the Impact of Stent and Scaffold Material and Strut Design on Coronary Artery Thrombosis from the Basic and Clinical Points of View.从基础和临床角度理解支架和支架材料及支柱设计对冠状动脉血栓形成的影响。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2018 Sep 4;5(3):71. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering5030071.
5
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: what have we learned from randomized-controlled clinical trials?用于治疗冠状动脉疾病的生物可吸收血管支架:我们从随机对照临床试验中学到了什么?
Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Jan;28(1):77-89. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000414.
6
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: Clinical outcomes from randomized controlled trials.用于治疗冠状动脉疾病的生物可吸收血管支架:随机对照试验的临床结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;88(S1):21-30. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26810.
7
Impact of Coronary Atherosclerosis on Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Resorption and Vessel Wall Integration.冠状动脉粥样硬化对生物可吸收血管支架吸收及血管壁整合的影响
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Jun 3;5(6):619-629. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.04.005. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Mid-term clinical outcomes of ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in a real-world population: A single-center experience.ABSOB生物可吸收血管支架植入术在真实世界人群中的中期临床结果:单中心经验
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Dec;16(8):461-4. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
9
Long-Term Outcomes of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent - A Randomized Comparison Through 5 Years in Japan.在日本通过 5 年的随机比较,可吸收生物可降解血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的长期结果。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):733-741. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1184. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
10
Differential aspects between cobalt-chromium everolimus drug-eluting stent and Absorb everolimus bioresorbable vascular scaffold: from bench to clinical use.钴铬依维莫司药物洗脱支架与Absorb依维莫司生物可吸收血管支架之间的差异:从实验台到临床应用
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;13(10):1127-45. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1089172.

引用本文的文献

1
Curcumin attenuates inflammation of Macrophage-derived foam cells treated with Poly-L-lactic acid degradation via PPARγ signaling pathway.姜黄素通过 PPARγ 信号通路减轻聚左旋乳酸降解诱导的巨噬细胞源性泡沫细胞炎症。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022 Mar 18;33(4):33. doi: 10.1007/s10856-022-06654-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes Before and After Complete Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Resorption: Five-Year Follow-Up From the ABSORB III Trial.完全降解依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架吸收前后的临床结果:ABSORB III 试验 5 年随访。
Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1895-1903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042584. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
2
Fully bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: lessons learned and future directions.完全生物可吸收血管支架:经验教训与未来方向。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019 May;16(5):286-304. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0124-7.
3
Long-Term Coronary Functional Assessment of the Infarct-Related Artery Treated With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: Insights of the TROFI II Trial.
采用依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架或依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗的梗死相关动脉的长期冠状动脉功能评估:TROFI II 试验的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1559-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
Neoatherosclerosis 5 Years After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation.生物可吸收血管支架置入 5 年后的再狭窄
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 1;71(17):1882-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.051.
5
Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Analysis From the ABSORB Trials.生物可吸收血管支架置入术后技术对结局的影响:ABSORB 试验分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2863-2874. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1106. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Mechanisms of Very Late Bioresorbable Scaffold Thrombosis: The INVEST Registry.非常晚期生物可吸收支架血栓形成的机制:INVEST 注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 7;70(19):2330-2344. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.014.
7
Neoatherosclerosis as the Cause of Late Failure of a Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold at 8 Months.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1896-1898. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy.2 年随访:Absorb 生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉疾病:7 项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析及一项个体化患者数据分析亚研究。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):760-772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31470-8. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
Arterial Remodeling After Bioresorbable Scaffolds and Metallic Stents.生物可吸收支架和金属支架后的动脉重塑。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 4;70(1):60-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.028.
10
Temporal Trends in Adverse Events After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架置入后不良事件的时间趋势:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2017 May 30;135(22):2145-2154. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028479.