Suppr超能文献

生物可吸收血管支架置入术后技术对结局的影响:ABSORB 试验分析。

Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Analysis From the ABSORB Trials.

机构信息

New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.

Instituto de Cardiologia Dante Pazzanese, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2863-2874. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1106. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Procedural technique may affect clinical outcomes after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. Prior studies suggesting such a relationship have not adjusted for baseline patient and lesion characteristics that may have influenced operator choice of technique and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether target lesion failure (TLF) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) and scaffold thrombosis (ScT) rates within 3 years of BVS implantation are affected by operator technique (vessel size selection and pre- and post-dilation parameters).

METHODS

TLF and ScT rates were determined in 2,973 patients with 3,149 BVS-treated coronary artery lesions from 5 prospective studies (ABSORB II, ABSORB China, ABSORB Japan, ABSORB III, and ABSORB Extend). Outcomes through 3 years (and between 0 to 1 and 1 to 3 years) were assessed according to pre-specified definitions of optimal technique (pre-dilation, vessel sizing, and post-dilation). Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for differences in up to 18 patient and lesion characteristics.

RESULTS

Optimal pre-dilation (balloon to core laboratory-derived reference vessel diameter ratio ≥1:1), vessel size selection (reference vessel diameter ≥2.25 mm and ≤3.75 mm), and post-dilation (with a noncompliant balloon at ≥18 atm and larger than the nominal scaffold diameter, but not by >0.5 mm larger) in all BVS-treated lesions were performed in 59.2%, 81.6%, and 12.4% of patients, respectively. BVS implantation in properly sized vessels was an independent predictor of freedom from TLF through 1 year (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; p = 0.01) and through 3 years (HR: 0.72; p = 0.01), and of freedom from ScT through 1 year (HR: 0.36; p = 0.004). Aggressive pre-dilation was an independent predictor of freedom from ScT between 1 and 3 years (HR: 0.44; p = 0.03), and optimal post-dilation was an independent predictor of freedom from TLF between 1 and 3 years (HR: 0.55; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present large-scale analysis from the major ABSORB studies, after multivariable adjustment for baseline patient and lesion characteristics, vessel sizing and operator technique were strongly associated with BVS-related outcomes during 3-year follow-up. (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial [ABSORB II]; NCT01425281; ABSORB III Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB-III]; NCT01751906; A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold [Absorb BVS] System in Chinese Population-ABSORB CHINA Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB CHINA]; NCT01923740; ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation [ABSORB EXTEND]; NCT01023789; AVJ-301 Clinical Trial: A Clinical Evaluation of AVJ-301 [Absorb BVS] in Japanese Population [ABSORB JAPAN]; NCT01844284).

摘要

背景

血管内支架(BVS)植入后的操作技术可能会影响临床结果。之前的研究表明存在这种关系,但没有调整可能影响操作者选择技术和结果的基线患者和病变特征。

目的

本研究旨在确定生物可吸收支架(BVS)植入后 3 年内靶病变失败(TLF)(心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建)和支架血栓形成(ScT)的发生率是否受操作者技术(血管大小选择以及预扩张和后扩张参数)的影响。

方法

对来自 ABSORB II、ABSORB China、ABSORB Japan、ABSORB III 和 ABSORB Extend 5 项前瞻性研究的 2973 例 BVS 治疗的冠状动脉病变患者的 TLF 和 ScT 发生率进行了评估。通过预先确定的最佳技术定义(预扩张、血管大小选择和后扩张)评估了 3 年(0 至 1 年和 1 至 3 年)的结局。采用多变量分析来调整最多 18 项患者和病变特征的差异。

结果

在所有 BVS 治疗的病变中,分别有 59.2%、81.6%和 12.4%的患者进行了最佳预扩张(球囊与核心实验室测量的参考血管直径比≥1:1)、血管大小选择(参考血管直径≥2.25mm 且≤3.75mm)和后扩张(使用非顺应性球囊扩张至≥18atm,且比标称支架直径大,但不超过 0.5mm)。适当大小的血管内植入 BVS 是 1 年(风险比[HR]:0.67;p=0.01)和 3 年(HR:0.72;p=0.01)无 TLF 发生率的独立预测因素,也是 1 年(HR:0.36;p=0.004)和 3 年(HR:0.44;p=0.03)无 ScT 发生率的独立预测因素。积极的预扩张是 1 至 3 年内无 ScT 的独立预测因素(HR:0.44;p=0.03),而最佳后扩张是 1 至 3 年内无 TLF 的独立预测因素(HR:0.55;p=0.05)。

结论

在来自主要 ABSORB 研究的这项大规模分析中,对基线患者和病变特征进行多变量调整后,血管大小选择和操作者技术与 3 年随访期间的 BVS 相关结局密切相关。(ABSORB II 随机对照试验[ABSORB II];NCT01425281;ABSORB III 随机对照试验[RCT] [ABSORB-III];NCT01751906;在中国人群中评价 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架系统的临床研究-ABSORB CHINA 随机对照试验[RCT] [ABSORB CHINA];NCT01923740;ABSORB EXTEND 临床研究;NCT01023789;AVJ-301 临床试验:在日本人群中评价 AVJ-301[Absorb BVS]的临床研究[ABSORB JAPAN];NCT01844284)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验