Horiguchi Ai, Kishihara Jun, Niwano Shinichi, Saito Daiki, Matsuura Gen, Sato Tetsuro, Shirakawa Yuki, Kobayashi Shuhei, Arakawa Yuki, Nishinarita Ryo, Nakamura Hironori, Ishizue Naruya, Oikawa Jun, Satoh Akira, Fukaya Hidehira, Ako Junya
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Japan.
Circ Rep. 2020 Feb 20;2(3):137-142. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0001.
The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) has been available since 2014 in Japan, and its benefit in the in-hospital acute phase at high risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) has been established, but its clinical use in the outpatient setting remains unclear, especially in Japan. The subjects consisted of 43 consecutive patients with WCD use in the outpatient setting from April 2014 to October 2019 at the present institute. Event alerts and wearing compliance were checked via the remote monitoring system, and a dedicated WCD training team contacted the patients if necessary. The median observation period was 51 days (IQR, 37-68 days) and the median daily wearing time was 23.1 h/day (IQR, 22.0-23.6 h/day). WCD was prescribed for primary prevention of VTA in 7 patients (16%), and for secondary prevention in 36 (84%). The common reason for WCD use was preventive therapy and/or clinical observation. Two appropriate and one inappropriate shock were observed. Eleven patients were not indicated for ICD because of successful catheter ablation optimal medical therapy, VTA in early onset of heart disease and refusal. The remaining 32 patients, however, underwent ICD implantation. In the present real-world study, the WCD wearing compliance was well-maintained in the outpatient setting. WCD is useful for patients at high risk of VTA.
可穿戴式心脏复律除颤器(WCD)自2014年起在日本上市,其在医院内室性快速心律失常(VTA)高危急性期的益处已得到证实,但其在门诊环境中的临床应用仍不明确,尤其是在日本。本研究对象为2014年4月至2019年10月期间在本机构门诊连续使用WCD的43例患者。通过远程监测系统检查事件警报和佩戴依从性,必要时由专门的WCD培训团队联系患者。中位观察期为51天(四分位间距,37 - 68天),中位每日佩戴时间为23.1小时/天(四分位间距,22.0 - 23.6小时/天)。7例患者(16%)因VTA一级预防而开具WCD,36例(84%)用于二级预防。使用WCD的常见原因是预防性治疗和/或临床观察。观察到2次恰当电击和1次不恰当电击。11例患者因导管消融成功、最佳药物治疗、心脏病早期出现VTA及拒绝而未被推荐植入ICD。然而,其余32例患者接受了ICD植入。在本项真实世界研究中,门诊环境下WCD的佩戴依从性良好。WCD对VTA高危患者有用。