Yap Jonathan, Lim Fang Yi, Gao Fei, Wang Sinead Z, Low Shoen C S, Le Thu Thao, Tan Ru-San
Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore.
SingHealth Polyclinics Singapore Singapore.
Circ Rep. 2020 May 13;2(6):306-313. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0126.
Myocardial viability assessment in revascularization of ischemic heart failure remains controversial. This study evaluated the prognostic utility of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in ischemic heart failure. This study retrospectively analyzed subjects with ischemic heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, who underwent CMR at a single center in 2004-2014 before undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or optimal medical therapy (OMT). Analyses were stratified by treatment. Myocardial segments were deemed non-viable if LGE exceeded 50% wall thickness. Overall and anterior viability were assessed. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and major adverse CV events. Among 165 subjects (mean (±SD) age 57.5±8.5 years, 152 males), 79 underwent CABG and 86 received OMT. A greater number of non-viable segments was significantly associated with higher all-cause and CV mortality in the CABG group (adjusted hazard ratios 1.17 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.01-1.37; P=0.04] and 1.25 [95% CI 1.01-1.56; P=0.045], respectively), but not in the OMT (P>0.05) group. Anterior wall viability did not affect outcomes. The extent of myocardial viability assessed by LGE appeared to identify patients with a differential survival benefit from CABG in this retrospective, small cohort study. These findings raise interesting hypotheses that need to be validated in larger prospective studies.
在缺血性心力衰竭血运重建中,心肌存活性评估仍存在争议。本研究评估了心脏磁共振成像(CMR)延迟钆增强(LGE)在缺血性心力衰竭中的预后价值。本研究回顾性分析了2004年至2014年间在单一中心接受CMR检查,随后接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或最佳药物治疗(OMT)的缺血性心力衰竭且左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的患者。分析按治疗方式分层。如果LGE超过室壁厚度的50%,则心肌节段被视为无活性。评估整体和前壁心肌存活性。结局指标为全因死亡率、心血管(CV)死亡率和主要不良心血管事件。在165例患者中(平均(±标准差)年龄57.5±8.5岁,男性152例),79例行CABG,86例接受OMT。在CABG组中,更多的无活性节段与更高的全因死亡率和CV死亡率显著相关(校正风险比分别为1.17 [95%置信区间{CI} 1.01 - 1.37;P = 0.04]和1.25 [95% CI 1.01 - 1.56;P = 0.045]),但在OMT组中无此关联(P>0.05)。前壁心肌存活性不影响结局。在这项回顾性、小样本队列研究中,通过LGE评估的心肌存活性程度似乎可识别出从CABG中获得不同生存获益的患者。这些发现提出了有趣的假设,需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进行验证。